It's very easy to get worked up over losing players, particularly junior players.
Perspective is key.
Losing Galvin = bad look. Potentially generational talent etc, blah blah.
However- signed Latu Fainu from Manly. Potentially generational talent etc blah blah.
Losing Galvin who was exposed to 1st grade, Da Silva the same, guys like Large that never had a chance to show etc...
Replaced with all the Fainu's...Seyfarth...took Twal as a kid, Doueihi..To'a was undeveloped..
And with the likes of Bula, Mason, the Lualili'i's, Pole, Sukkar...and with guys like Saukuru, Godinet, Tapau-Moors, Tannous, Broederlow, Haywood...still coming through...all from our junior paths...
It is easy to focus on the ones you lose.
Don't lose track of how many get developed & become part of the club. It's not as if teams have 100% turnover in playing personnel each season. There are only so many Top 30 spots to go around- you WILL lose players..because not many spots open up every year on the roster.
I don't want to lose Da Silva.
But if we do, it's not any more a slight on Benji's coaching than it is on any coach that loses players. And EVERY coach loses players. Ivan Cleary, on that theory, is probably the worst coach in the NRL. Imagine losing Katoa & Luai & Burton. What a terrible recruitment record!
Tigers want to build something from the mess we have had. Api, regardless of age, is a huge part of that. Probably responsible for Luai & Turuva. Who are probably responsible for May & May.
What has Da Silva's development brought into the club?