Tedesco Gone Again?

@LaT said:
Nofo is now primarily a winger who can fill in at fullback, and Teddy filling in at wing even though he is a complete fullback.

Makes no sense to put Nofo at the back and keep Teddy on the wing. Plus Nofo is still out till R10 according to the injury list.

Nofoluama is a better fullback from what I have seen.
 
Wouldn't it be nice to have a settled team. After today's match I would have some trepidation in putting Tedesco at fullback against the Broncos. However with Koro coming in we are back to musical chairs as to who fits where in the backline. Lawrence and Ayshford look to be the only backline players likely to play in the same position they filled in their last match.
 
@LaT said:
Ohh, alrighty.

I only started watching the delay at halftime. Figured people were talking about something that had already happened, thats why I though he was coming back out. Turns out it hasn't even happened yet.

![](https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRxI1MVBGhd7BoPDZro3ygc9XZA4TU8FRUHJki8YJdJVZXNjr9RzA)
 
It was his first rep game and people are already calling for Nofo or Rowe to be our future fullback instead. Relax everyone, he didn't have his greatest game but that happens to everyone once in a while, I'm backing him to have a great game against the Broncos no matter where he plays.
 
@Milky said:
I think he should be kept on the wing, just my two cents but If we keep him on the wing it would allow either Nofoluama or Rowe at fullback. Tedesco has not let us down yet on the wing so keep him there.

If you haven't been watching he's let in 3 or 4 tries on the wing from mainly weak one on one defense.
 
@Milky said:
I think he should be kept on the wing, just my two cents but If we keep him on the wing it would allow either Nofoluama or Rowe at fullback. Tedesco has not let us down yet on the wing so keep him there.

So you must have missed the dropped catches when he was on the wing and the opposition scored from them ?
 
@Muffstar said:
@Milky said:
I think he should be kept on the wing, just my two cents but If we keep him on the wing it would allow either Nofoluama or Rowe at fullback. Tedesco has not let us down yet on the wing so keep him there.

So you must have missed the dropped catches when he was on the wing and the opposition scored from them ?

I'd rather have Nofo on the wing than Tedesco, and I'd prefer Teddy at fullback over both Nofo and Rowe.
 
Geez you guys are all morons. Don't just take what the commentators say as gospel. Teddy was ok. No worse than city's other backs. HSure he dropped a couple of dodgy passes around his ankles. Oh no! He must be totally useless.

He's still 200% better than Moltzen. His support play in attack for city was very good! Ccould have scored a try to put city ahead if he held hoffmans dodgy pass, if he scored he'd be a hero. He dropped it, so he's a reject? He's still our best back at the moment, like it or not!
 
Balmain boy you can't tell me on performance alone that teddy is going better than molten.Thats the problem we seem to over rate our players. At the moment apart from marshal farah and woods the rest wouldn't make any other team.we need some players and fast otherwize we will struggle to get of the bottom.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@jimmyz said:
Balmain boy you can't tell me on performance alone that teddy is going better than molten.Thats the problem we seem to over rate our players. At the moment apart from marshal farah and woods the rest wouldn't make any other team.we need some players and fast otherwize we will struggle to get of the bottom.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

I'm nto over rating anyone. Im not saying Teddy's been great, but all our backs have been awful. Moltzen has caught a few bombs (which is what he's meant to do!) but apart frm that has done absolutely nothing so far. At least teddy supports the play i attack (which moltzen very rarely does) and he hits the line hard and has footwork.

The fact is in our current team Teddy is the only player who looks like making a break! I think Teddy would have caught the bombs Moltz did and he can attack. So yes he's in better form than moltzen. Just because Moltz was awful last season, and is better this season doesn't mean he;s playing well, he's just playing less bad.

We need mroe youngsters in our backline. We won't win until we do.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top