Just because the guy signs elsewhere there is always put him in the Reggies for the rest of his tenure , this thinking is just ridiculous .The club will only prosper with a competitive team week in week out and the end game is to finish as high up the ladder as possible to secure future memberships and sponsors.
Missing the top 8 with such a young team is not the end of the world. How are future memberships going to be sold by promoting James Tedesco if he leaves? Come watch a player who won't be here next year? Then in 2015, Tigers are stuck with no fullback, because they thought short term and didn't evaluate any options during the year.
I'd rather see what we have in Rowe, Simona and Nofoaluma and see if any of them can be the future, rather than developing Tedesco so the Raiders can benefit from it. And if that means a couple of less wins for a clearer image of who is the future at that position, so be it. Because all playing Tedesco does is delay that decision by a year, where the ramifications are larger.