Black_n_White
New member
@hammertime said:@Irvine said:@stryker said:Pretty stupid rant mate to be honest.
Ted doesnt deserve what the raiders payed and I am glad the club stood their ground.
We didnt turn our back on him, the club has brought him along and through the juniors taught him to play whilst the seniors have been very patient with his extended injuries pumping lots of money into getting him back on the park.
He repayed this by running out on us and chasing the dollar. Simple as that.
Didn't turn our back on him ? We initially offered him Less than what he is on NOW if that is not a clear signal of turning your back on someone I don't know what is.
Then a brain wave of an idea.
We will tell him we need to offload players to buy some time so we can resign his mates…he wont leave his mates...I am sure he will stay for half the money he can get elsewhere once his mates get signed.
Maybe Tedesco doesn't deserve what Raiders paid but he doesn't deserve to be insulted with an offer for less than what he is on this year.
Ohh Hi Benny lets upgrade your nephews contract...400k OK ? No problems mate
Well if that's true about Moses getting $400k, that concerns me Irvine. But maybe was there something in their already agreed in a prior agreement with being promoted to playing state cup? Maybe Mayer had no control over it?
At the end of the day, I agree Ted at least deserves the same as Moses. Ted is at least a proven player.
With the 2015 shortfall, I'm assuming though that the tigers may have tried to backload it to make up for it? If so, I can't really see a big problem with that?
Signing his mates is also smart tactics…I don't begrudge Mayer for that and his mates obviously valued playing for the tigers more than ted since they signed immediately without fuss.
I think Mayer still has a lot of fixing to do with humphreys disasterous work with our cap and it's probably causing a lot of problems...
At the end of it, it sounds like the Tigers made a good offer. I hope at the end ted was grateful for their efforts. After all, he is only **one** of many talent kids in the squad that deserve to be paid well... Not to mention the chunk Robbie must take up.
Irvine, Moses and Brooks were legitimate hot property with both Broncos and Knights sniffing around, much different to when we initially tabled an offer to Tedesco who's manager was touting ficticious offers from Rooters and the Dogs and chose to hold out himself. Secondly, Moses has a KPI based contract same as Brooks, so isnt making anywhere near the ceiling of his whole possible contract, if Teddy had the same KPI's in place he would have earned jack all last year because he barely played…
Only once Teddy stalled his negotiations with no other legitimate suitors bar the hail mary that his manager may have been able to push his other client Milford to Brisbane, thus creating an opening for him at Canberra, did the Tigers actually go ahead resigning other players. Moral of the story is that Ayoub and Teddy painted us into a corner, our first priority put us on the backburner leaving us little option but to tie up other talent... we couldnt have been waiting until now for Teddy to get in a bidding war with a big enough war chest to do so, whilst leaving that many players (Siro, Simona and Nofa) on the market to also have to possibly compete for.
if what you and Happy are selling is true, and he wanted to stay he could have kept negotiations going early instead of bluffing as if he had options thinking our retention would grind to a stand-still on his whims... eventually the club had to make a call, wait on one prima donna or retain alot of talent, and he was eventually unhappy with the offer that was ultimately the dregs of the warchest... thats the thing with bluffs, once too many chips are in the pot it becomes all or nothing.
Boo Freaken Hoo