The factions.

[innsaneink]

INK THATS JUST NITPICKING.

Maybe it is mate but Ive never seen such a fractured fan base in my 7 or 8 years on these forums and its just something thats bugging me.
Just wanted to get it off my chest.

Blame the Wests Tigers marketing team Ink for the 'line that divides'

Haha yeah thats a stroke of genius eh? :laughing:

 

[Kul]

Just an interesting note, but the same "Moltzen v Lui" debate is going on over at LU, so it's hardly something that's a result of "factions" on this forum.

The fact that it's happening on two separate forums in two mostly separate groups of supporters (for the most part) suggest that this is an issue in the wider fan base too.

plus, isn't it refreshing that we can be having argument over which of the two or three halfbacks is better?
sure does beat the old LOvsCS debates of old

 

[tiger05]

I dunno why, its different now, in the past theres been fitzy, theres been Morris, and of course Sheens that divides opinion but imo this is causing a greater division and personally for me its disappointing.

The thing is Ink you are just being hypocritical. You have been a major attacker of Fitzy and Morris and now Moltzen. You seem to have a lot of negative comments towards other posters and now you start this thread in a weak attempt to try and make out your the good guy.

Like I said I think it is unmanly. I think your opinions are pretty much full of stuff no on likes stepping in but you entitled to your opinion. You should learn to let others have their opinions.

If I was you I'd have a good long hard look in the mirror.

 

[Kul]

oooooh snap!

 

[underdog]

plus, isn't it refreshing that we can be having argument over which of the two or three halfbacks is better?
sure does beat the old LOvsCS debates of old

Thats a fair point -

we are arguing about too much talent in the side - for once!

take it back to the old balmain/magpie days, or the 2001-2004 days, and we'd be arguing about how much were were gonna lose by..

 

[innsaneink]

Just an interesting note, but the same "Moltzen v Lui" debate is going on over at LU, so it's hardly something that's a result of "factions" on this forum.

The fact that it's happening on two separate forums in two mostly separate groups of supporters (for the most part) suggest that this is an issue in the wider fan base too.

plus, isn't it refreshing that we can be having argument over which of the two or three halfbacks is better?
sure does beat the old LOvsCS debates of old

Pretty much the same people here & there Kul…you know that.

 

[Kul]

really?

Being conservative, I would have thought that at least half of the regular posters there don't post here. Happy to be corrected

either way, the original point still stands

 

[tiger4ever]

Im only on this forum i dont have time for others.

If there is anyone with a agenda and brings it up in every topic without fail the worst by a country mile is bug with his hatred for sheens.anyone disagree

 

[tiger05]

Im only on this forum i dont have time for others.

Same here. Yet another story from Ink.

 

[Marshall_magic]

Im only on this forum i dont have time for others.

Same here. Yet another story from Ink.

There are many posters who post on both. I can think of several who post under the same ID on both and there could be others who post under different IDs on the different forums, but generally the talk on both forums is pretty similar. Hardly a story.

 

[Kul]

the ring-leaders there don't post here though
and the rules there are different, so the whole idea that this place is skewed towards a certain agenda just is crap

 

[happy_tiger]

Why is what is going on in other forums being talked about . Personally I don't think their are agendas . I may not agree with someone on particular issues but may agree on others . Thats life . For example the Moltzen and Tiger 05 issue I don't agree . But he is a fan for starting with Woods and I am totally 100% with him on that one . Yeah some people bait others If you don't like it just ignore them Again that happens in life Every day we work and live with people we may or may not agree with .Just laugh and smile Things could be worse

 

[tiger05]

Things could be worse

It depends. If your a loser whose whole life revolves around posting on here you might feel differently. You might even start a thread like this one.

 

[happy_tiger]

Things could be worse

It depends. If your a loser whose whole life revolves around posting on here you might feel differently. You might even start a thread like this one.

As I said in earlier comment just don't take the bait then .Ignore it

 

[innsaneink]

the ring-leaders there don't post here though
and the rules there are different, **so the whole idea that this place is skewed towards a certain agenda just is crap**

Wow….how you came up with that is well, very creative.
I never said that.
As admin Kul its disappointing youre putting words in peoples mouths - so to speak

 

[Joel Helmes]

The Moltzen issue is different to previous arguments about players such as Fitzhenry and Morris simply because it's more of a 50/50 argument.

In other words half the fans here love Moltzen, the other half dont.

I think with Morris and Fitzy the vast majority questioned their recruitment and selection in the team.

At the end of the day the forum is a place to discuss issues, nothing wrong with that so long as it doesn't get personal.

 

[Kul]

Whoa! Ink, calm down man. I was NEVER having a go at you mate!
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED

 

[happy_tiger]

The Moltzen issue is different to previous arguments about players such as Fitzhenry and Morris simply because it's more of a 50/50 argument.

In other words half the fans here love Moltzen, the other half dont.

I think with Morris and Fitzy the vast majority questioned their recruitment and selection in the team.

At the end of the day the forum is a place to discuss issues, nothing wrong with that so long as it doesn't get personal.

100% right Helmesy The problem is people run out of solid arguments or facts and then have a personal shot

 

[tiger4ever]

Lol well happy tiger who knows whos got their facts right is the other way of looking at it.

for instance we had a DISSAGREEMENT if we should keep fulton and gibbs…. where did you say anything factual.

joke

 

[happy_tiger]

Lol well happy tiger who knows whos got their facts right is the other way of looking at it.

for instance we had a DISSAGREEMENTo if we should keep fulton and gibbs where could you say you say you say anything factual.

joke

Ok I will bury the hatchet If you weren't Trolling I apologize and just leave it at that