The factions.

innsaneink

Well-known member
The factions that have been forming, the little cliques….members supporting players over other players rather than the team.

People are looking at individual incidents in games and using them as reasons for losses

People are looking at one players mistakes and arguing if it was "player i support" the forum would be going off.

By all means give your opinions, but dont turn every single one of your posts into an agenda for one player against another....its really making this place tiresome

Support the team, and ALL the players.
 
@innsaneink said:
The factions that have been forming, the little cliques….members supporting players over other players rather than the team.

People are looking at individual incidents in games and using them as reasons for losses

People are looking at one players mistakes and arguing if it was "player i support" the forum would be going off.

By all means give your opinions, but dont turn every single one of your posts into an agenda for one player against another....its really making this place tiresome

Support the team, and ALL the players.

And coaching staff ah ink.lol
 
Examples please, u ask for them to support other peoples posts so provide your own.

I can think of a few to support you, but i didnt start the thread, so ill leave it to you. Think ill support you on this thread once you do.
 
@king sirro said:
**Examples please, u ask for them to support other peoples posts so provide your own.**

I can think of a few to support you, but i didnt start the thread, so ill leave it to you. Think ill support you on this thread once you do.

????
Im not following any of this

I didnt ask for people

to support other peoples posts
 
Sorry, just saying ive seen many times when you have asked for examples when someone is posting something that "groups" forum users in a certain catagory of belief. You saying the forum is doing this and doing that with agenda's and it should be noted, i agree, but i know u can back it up with examples…..go all the way.

Ill start, Tiger05 against Lui

Next.....
 
Yeah thats what Im talking about the crap surrounding Moltzen….I think its Tiger05s absolutely garbage post rubbishing MacKinnon tonite where clearly anyone with a clue could see he was one of our better players.

Its all surrounding Moltzen...I dunno I just think this forum currently is way down on previous ones, its the same old crap post after post

I appreciate everyone is entitled to their opinion and thats fine but some just turn it into an agenda.
 
@king sirro said:
Sorry, just saying ive seen many times when you have asked for examples when someone is posting something that "groups" forum users in a certain catagory of belief. You saying the forum is doing this and doing that with agenda's and it should be noted, i agree, but i know u can back it up with examples…..go all the way.

Ill start, Tiger05 against Lui
\
\
\
\
Next.....

The entire forum just about v Moltzen>>>>>>

next…
 
I havent seen where he has bagged McKinnon for tonights performance, where is it? I dont mind Tiger05, he has his opinions and some i agree with, but ive been one guy who has been negative towards Wade and even i can say he was our best tonight.
 
I dunno where it is theres two of those clowns with similar usernames

The mods on the old forum used to delete spam posts much like post 3 in this thread and post 2 in this one
http://www.weststigersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7807&time=1305981796
intelligence level severely lacking here lately
 
@tiger05 said:
@king sirro said:
Ill start, Tiger05 against Lui

Ink - I understand your out of your depth whenever someone disagrees with you but your thread is pretty weak. Go on grow a pair.

Im out of my depth????????
:laughing:
Try quoting the correct person.
 
@tiger05 said:
@king sirro said:
Ill start, Tiger05 against Lui

Ink - I understand your out of your depth whenever someone disagrees with you but your thread is pretty weak. Go on grow a pair.

I just can't believe that you still think that Moltzen is the answer at fullback and MacKinnon is not . I'm not criticising you but it is ok to say you have it wrong mate and having a personal dig at Ink when 95% of people agree with him , I just scratch my head :wtf
 
It's just differing opinions mate. There is no real agenda's around. For something to be an agenda is has to be carried by someone with the power to change something imo.
 
@happy tiger said:
@tiger05 said:
@king sirro said:
Ill start, Tiger05 against Lui

Ink - I understand your out of your depth whenever someone disagrees with you but your thread is pretty weak. Go on grow a pair.

I just can't believe that you still think that Moltzen is the answer at fullback and MacKinnon is not . I'm not criticising you but it is ok to say you have it wrong mate and having a personal dig at Ink when 95% of people agree with him , I just scratch my head :wtf

No - Ink starts a thread to try and have a go at me and it is pretty pathetic in my opinion. I'd call it unmanly.

I am allowed my opinion on McKinnon and Lui and Moltzen and Ink can debate against it but coming up with a thread detailing factions and the like is childish at best.
 
@MacDougall said:
It's just differing opinions mate. There is no real agenda's around. For something to be an agenda is has to be carried by someone with the power to change something imo.

And that is what a forum is meant to be about.
 
Back
Top