@bigsiro said in [The inevitable Luke Brooks thread\.\.](/post/1190782) said:
@pawsandclaws1 The figure Roosters disclose they are paying Keary and what he is actually getting paid are two totally different figures.
I wouldn’t believe a word of what you read regarding many player “salaries”.
That is what is out there in the media. If you have proof it is incorrect write to Peter V'landys.
Regardless, it doesn't change the fact that Reynolds and Mbye are receiving money similar to Keary. Keary is a far better player. Mbye missed four tackles and cost us four tries against Souths. Kindergarten performance and why hasn't he been dropped? Double standard?
Paws ,you have to take your dislike for Mbye and Reynolds out of the equation when talking salaries of other players...
Both were recruited prior to Madge,both had severe injuries to overcome while with us and obviously Madge can see what both offer to the team..
These are ***our elite players*** TT. I like Mbye as a person, he is articulate and a family man. My issue is if both contributed the way Keary does, we would be a top 4 team. They are not so questions need to be asked. If that us uncomfortable for some well .........
Keary has suffered how many knocks attempting to tackle much bigger players? Compare that with the four missed tackles against Souths. Keary plays with heart and skill.
IMO the mistake you are making Paws is equating $$$ paid to status. Mbye & Reynolds are not our elite players. IMO we no longer have any elite players. The salary of the players ONLY matters with regards to the salary cap and the squad you can put together as a result. After that the salary they get is totally irrelevant.
The salary that Mbye & Reynolds are getting is a mistake made by Cleary and/or Tigers Management at the time. Its done. After that you just simply look at the performance of the player and judge them on that.
The best example of this is Mbye. Everyone bags him week in week out but he is playing well enough to deserve his position. Other than the one week where he had a 19yo debutant outside him, he has been strong defensively and shown glimpses in attack. Looked strong in attack from Fullback last week. If he was getting paid $300K we would ALL love him.
For some reason it doesnt go the opposite way. Im a Brooks fan, but I concede he will never be Joey Johns or even Nathan Cleary for that matter, but IMO he is a good half (better than average) and in a comp where good halves are scarce, we should value that. Brooks on his reported wage $600K would be in the bottom half of salaries in the NRL for halves but he doesnt get a break in the same way.
What you have written dollars v ability is correct. However, that is elite money and both have offered nothing near that type of performance.
Mbye has been a huge disappointment. He offers nothing in attack from centre but did from fullback. At fullback under the highball he is poor. So where do you put him?
I won't go into Reynolds other than to say he offers less than Mbye.
I agree with you on Brooks.