The WT Identity

@tiger_bond said in [The WT Identity](/post/1459856) said:
After reading most comments here I realised the real problem is that it starts with our fans who are entrenched in “cancel culture” (I don’t like what is being said so forget it and move on)

The article is about how the club’s we followed had a soul and an identity (no matter which side you came from) and that we need to make changes to recapture that, some so-called die hard fans on this forum like to dismiss other people’s experiences because it doesn’t suit them.

Our club is so divided under the surface, it’s like a married couple that hates each other but are only staying together for the children.

As long as we keep demonising each other’s origins we will stay a club that just makes up numbers like we have the last 10 years.

That’s a really good point. Without the fans from the Balmain and Wests origins we wouldn’t have any support. I know some staunch pre club fans have remained true to the original teams and stopped supporting the nrl teams (Warren Smith said as much on the Penrith / Tigers call to Blocker) but you can’t tell me that the majority of our fan base just decided to follow Rugby league and pick the Wests Tigers and didn’t have any influence from family or supporters of the two former foundation clubs.
Most of our supporters are transitioned from the former clubs and or are relatives / friends of those original supporters.

There was some work done a few years back when Ivan was building his Bus up where he put together a welcome to WestsTigers video showcasing our history to new recruits.
Does anyone know if that still exists or gets used?

I think the supporter base is split down the middle.
1) we are new club entirely with links to 2 former foundation clubs and should create our own identity.
2) we are a club born off the history of 2 foundation clubs that have 2 strong identity’s and should be recognised in today’s team.
 
@coivtny said in [The WT Identity](/post/1458236) said:
That stuff rings a bell with me but not with the players of today. Hope he enjoyed writing it because he's obviously passionate but, other than making him feel good, it's a waste of effort. Around half today's players are Polynesian in origin and they don't relate to this stuff. The others are from all over the place and it just won't resonate with them.

This is a very valid point, I would even say more than half Polynesian. Don’t really know the motivation for these guys, but we really need to know and fast. Maybe we need a coach that can motivate them better than what Madge can. Stephen Kearney anyone ??
 
@mike said in [The WT Identity](/post/1458918) said:
We are not the Western Suburbs Magpies
We are not Balmain.

We are the WESTS TIGERS.
That’s who we are. That’s our identity.

Just like the young woman in the stands thumping the WESTS TIGERS emblem on her chest and screaming WESTS TIGERS ‘till I die.

That’s who we are.

I’m really hoping the club has got in touch with that young girl. Gave me goosebumps watching that. As I was once like her!
 
@turkeytiger03 said in [The WT Identity](/post/1459862) said:
@mike said in [The WT Identity](/post/1458918) said:
We are not the Western Suburbs Magpies
We are not Balmain.

We are the WESTS TIGERS.
That’s who we are. That’s our identity.

Just like the young woman in the stands thumping the WESTS TIGERS emblem on her chest and screaming WESTS TIGERS ‘till I die.

That’s who we are.

I’m really hoping the club has got in touch with that young girl. Gave me goosebumps watching that. As I was once like her!

Me too. It sure did.
 
@mike said in [The WT Identity](/post/1458918) said:
We are not the Western Suburbs Magpies
We are not Balmain.

We are the WESTS TIGERS.
That’s who we are. That’s our identity.

Just like the young woman in the stands thumping the WESTS TIGERS emblem on her chest and screaming WESTS TIGERS ‘till I die.

That’s who we are.

For sure Mike! She gets it, people like her are the future of our fan base, not old dinosaurs who can't stop reminiscing about what the old club meant to them. Just like the new wave of players coming through, their childhood memories are Marshall and co, not Gary Jack.

I get the point of the article but having a cool story is more the icing on the cake, and despite what he says, on-field success is the main driver of success of the club.
 
@tiger_bond said in [The WT Identity](/post/1459856) said:
After reading most comments here I realised the real problem is that it starts with our fans who are entrenched in “cancel culture” (I don’t like what is being said so forget it and move on)

The article is about how the club’s we followed had a soul and an identity (no matter which side you came from) and that we need to make changes to recapture that, some so-called die hard fans on this forum like to dismiss other people’s experiences because it doesn’t suit them.

Our club is so divided under the surface, it’s like a married couple that hates each other but are only staying together for the children.

As long as we keep demonising each other’s origins we will stay a club that just makes up numbers like we have the last 10 years.

Spot on
Great post
 
@barra said in [The WT Identity](/post/1459915) said:
@mike said in [The WT Identity](/post/1458918) said:
We are not the Western Suburbs Magpies
We are not Balmain.

We are the WESTS TIGERS.
That’s who we are. That’s our identity.

Just like the young woman in the stands thumping the WESTS TIGERS emblem on her chest and screaming WESTS TIGERS ‘till I die.

That’s who we are.

For sure Mike! **She gets it, people like her are the future of our fan base, not old dinosaurs who can't stop reminiscing about what the old club meant to them.** Just like the new wave of players coming through, their childhood memories are Marshall and co, not Gary Jack.

I get the point of the article but having a cool story is more the icing on the cake, and despite what he says, on-field success is the main driver of success of the club.

Tip: Our IDENTITY doesn't come from the future
Can yiu guess where it comes from?
 
@innsaneink said in [The WT Identity](/post/1459941) said:
@barra said in [The WT Identity](/post/1459915) said:
@mike said in [The WT Identity](/post/1458918) said:
We are not the Western Suburbs Magpies
We are not Balmain.

We are the WESTS TIGERS.
That’s who we are. That’s our identity.

Just like the young woman in the stands thumping the WESTS TIGERS emblem on her chest and screaming WESTS TIGERS ‘till I die.

That’s who we are.

For sure Mike! **She gets it, people like her are the future of our fan base, not old dinosaurs who can't stop reminiscing about what the old club meant to them.** Just like the new wave of players coming through, their childhood memories are Marshall and co, not Gary Jack.

I get the point of the article but having a cool story is more the icing on the cake, and despite what he says, on-field success is the main driver of success of the club.

Tip: Our IDENTITY doesn't come from the future
Can yiu guess where it comes from?

That’s the real issue, isn’t it Ink?
Two clubs became one, and we’re creating a cultural crisis by trying to rid ourselves of historical facts surrounding those two clubs. Rather than cancel them, we need to find a way to flavour those two old clubs with the new club.
 
What a load of CRAP. Guess what, if we make the eight next year, all this garbage disappears. In 2005, when we won, Magpies and Tigers supporters were stuck like super glue to each other! Where we play means SFA to the players. Having said that, ive never heard anybody say they always wanted to play at Cambo or Olympic Park or Bankwest. But, I have heard them say they love Leichhardt.
 
@crucible said in [The WT Identity](/post/1459987) said:
What a load of CRAP. Guess what, if we make the eight next year, all this garbage disappears. In 2005, when we won, Magpies and Tigers supporters were stuck like super glue to each other! Where we play means SFA to the players. Having said that, ive never heard anybody say they always wanted to play at Cambo or Olympic Park or Bankwest. But, I have heard them say they love Leichhardt.

I agree the whole concept is baloney. What do Cronulla stand for? Parramatta? Dragons?

It used to be mostly about geography and that was fine in the days when most locals supported the local team. That's no longer true - fans are spread everywhere - and when you are a merged entity, you have a potentially unfixable geographical split - there is literally no way to match up the experience of Balmain with Concord with Campbelltown with Camden. They aren't the same thing.

The Dragons similarly cannot and will never coalesce Kogarah with Wollongong, because they aren't the same. If they were Wollongong-only they'd be more like Newcastle in representing an area and a people identified with that area, but any club in Sydney is really just a mix of all the bits and pieces. As far as I can tell, the Steelers have basically been eaten up, despite being 50% owned by WIN Corp.

Souths might like to consider themselves based in the heart of Redfern, but Redfern is no longer anything like what it was in the 1970s, and the old working-class battlers of South Sydney are all pretty well-heeled these days, same as Balmain. Souths haven't played consistently at Redfern for decades.

And that's where I call baloney for Balmain Tigers. My great-grandfather was born and raised in Lilyfield. He was a boy when Balmain were incorporated. My grandfather was one of 8 boys raised in Lilyfield and bought his house in Leichhardt. So all those men, even when they ultimately dispersed across the state, were working-class Balmain supporters from day 1.

I spent a lot of my youth in Leichhardt and it transformed tremendously between the 1980s and 2000s. It developed a very strong Italian flavour, the house prices became extremely sharp and the profile of the area changed dramatically. Balmain started to have big issues with not being able to engage the new white collar private school residents of Balmain, and nowadays Balmain and Birchgrove are as gentrified and insular as any alcove of Sydney.

So what is or was the identity of Balmain Tigers that the original article refers to? It's a myth in my opinion. The Balmain Tigers I knew as a young boy were developed from dock builders and factory workers, white Aussie catholics with a sprinkle of indigenous around the Glebe area. That is nothing like what Balmain was in 1997. There's a reason why Balmain were battlers all throughout the 90s and had barely a leg to stand on during Super League.

Nowadays I believe the old Balmain brigade has little to do with what Balmain were as a club in those last decades. Supporters like me from the last golden-era 1980s are all now 40 or older, many no longer live in the area, but all like going back for that dose of old nostalgia. I remember very clearly going to Leichhardt Oval as a kid - there was nothing nostalgic about it at the time, the facilities were ordinary and the crowds were often poor. I loved it to death, but it was nothing like the boutique Newtown-style chic decay nostalgia rush it has become.

Parallel with this is the Magpies experience, basically drifting ever westward per their namesake. The club incorporated in Ashfield, played for a while at Concord Oval, were muscled out of Pratten Park in 1967 (the council wouldn't let them play Sunday matches because of church - seriously), spent 20 years at Lidcombe, then decided to go wholesale to Orana Park. Wests Ashfield is a high-profit pokie den and the local area now has a heavy Asian immigrant influence. So what would you say Wests Magpies "are"? Half the modern supporters would not have been to Lidcombe Oval in their lives, let alone Pratten Park. How do you match up Campbelltown and Ashfield? The answer is "you don't", and anyone who claims a single sustained heritage or identity from that history is kidding themselves.

In my opinion those club heritages have all been condensed into a nostalgia-sized snack, with most living fans only being able to go back with fondness to either the late-80s Balmain, Wok-era Wests, or at oldest, the joint Balmain and Wests failed assaults against the might of St George in the late 1950s through 1960s. Not only is a "single identity" a fantasy, nobody could truly tell you what that single identity is.
 
@turkeytiger03 said in [The WT Identity](/post/1459861) said:
@coivtny said in [The WT Identity](/post/1458236) said:
That stuff rings a bell with me but not with the players of today. Hope he enjoyed writing it because he's obviously passionate but, other than making him feel good, it's a waste of effort. Around half today's players are Polynesian in origin and they don't relate to this stuff. The others are from all over the place and it just won't resonate with them.

This is a very valid point, I would even say more than half Polynesian. Don’t really know the motivation for these guys, but we really need to know and fast. Maybe we need a coach that can motivate them better than what Madge can. Stephen Kearney anyone ??

Lot of the Polynesian boys come from intense households with tons of kids running around and being screamed and yelled at is the norm. Madge’s screaming rants, while I’m sure well-intentioned are literally white noise to them, they probably don’t even hear it.

A coach like Cleary has taken a different approach to coaching and garnered better results with a predominately Polynesian group.
 
Well said JIRSKYR. I went to school in Rozelle. We would walk from near White Bay to Leichhardt Oval for sport !!! I was 7 and completely shot by the time I got there. It was like the Changi March complete with nuns with the cane if you spoke . The good old days !!!!!!!! ???????//
 
@jirskyr said in [The WT Identity](/post/1460022) said:
@crucible said in [The WT Identity](/post/1459987) said:
What a load of CRAP. Guess what, if we make the eight next year, all this garbage disappears. In 2005, when we won, Magpies and Tigers supporters were stuck like super glue to each other! Where we play means SFA to the players. Having said that, ive never heard anybody say they always wanted to play at Cambo or Olympic Park or Bankwest. But, I have heard them say they love Leichhardt.

I agree the whole concept is baloney. What do Cronulla stand for? Parramatta? Dragons?

It used to be mostly about geography and that was fine in the days when most locals supported the local team. That's no longer true - fans are spread everywhere - and when you are a merged entity, you have a potentially unfixable geographical split - there is literally no way to match up the experience of Balmain with Concord with Campbelltown with Camden. They aren't the same thing.

The Dragons similarly cannot and will never coalesce Kogarah with Wollongong, because they aren't the same. If they were Wollongong-only they'd be more like Newcastle in representing an area and a people identified with that area, but any club in Sydney is really just a mix of all the bits and pieces. As far as I can tell, the Steelers have basically been eaten up, despite being 50% owned by WIN Corp.

Souths might like to consider themselves based in the heart of Redfern, but Redfern is no longer anything like what it was in the 1970s, and the old working-class battlers of South Sydney are all pretty well-heeled these days, same as Balmain. Souths haven't played consistently at Redfern for decades.

And that's where I call baloney for Balmain Tigers. My great-grandfather was born and raised in Lilyfield. He was a boy when Balmain were incorporated. My grandfather was one of 8 boys raised in Lilyfield and bought his house in Leichhardt. So all those men, even when they ultimately dispersed across the state, were working-class Balmain supporters from day 1.

I spent a lot of my youth in Leichhardt and it transformed tremendously between the 1980s and 2000s. It developed a very strong Italian flavour, the house prices became extremely sharp and the profile of the area changed dramatically. Balmain started to have big issues with not being able to engage the new white collar private school residents of Balmain, and nowadays Balmain and Birchgrove are as gentrified and insular as any alcove of Sydney.

So what is or was the identity of Balmain Tigers that the original article refers to? It's a myth in my opinion. The Balmain Tigers I knew as a young boy were developed from dock builders and factory workers, white Aussie catholics with a sprinkle of indigenous around the Glebe area. That is nothing like what Balmain was in 1997. There's a reason why Balmain were battlers all throughout the 90s and had barely a leg to stand on during Super League.

Nowadays I believe the old Balmain brigade has little to do with what Balmain were as a club in those last decades. Supporters like me from the last golden-era 1980s are all now 40 or older, many no longer live in the area, but all like going back for that dose of old nostalgia. I remember very clearly going to Leichhardt Oval as a kid - there was nothing nostalgic about it at the time, the facilities were ordinary and the crowds were often poor. I loved it to death, but it was nothing like the boutique Newtown-style chic decay nostalgia rush it has become.

Parallel with this is the Magpies experience, basically drifting ever westward per their namesake. The club incorporated in Ashfield, played for a while at Concord Oval, were muscled out of Pratten Park in 1967 (the council wouldn't let them play Sunday matches because of church - seriously), spent 20 years at Lidcombe, then decided to go wholesale to Orana Park. Wests Ashfield is a high-profit pokie den and the local area now has a heavy Asian immigrant influence. So what would you say Wests Magpies "are"? Half the modern supporters would not have been to Lidcombe Oval in their lives, let alone Pratten Park. How do you match up Campbelltown and Ashfield? The answer is "you don't", and anyone who claims a single sustained heritage or identity from that history is kidding themselves.

In my opinion those club heritages have all been condensed into a nostalgia-sized snack, with most living fans only being able to go back with fondness to either the late-80s Balmain, Wok-era Wests, or at oldest, the joint Balmain and Wests failed assaults against the might of St George in the late 1950s through 1960s. Not only is a "single identity" a fantasy, nobody could truly tell you what that single identity is.

A seriously well written and interesting history lesson post.
But what is your view for our future?
How do we get out of the hole we seem to be in as far as location/re-location is concerned?
Imo that's a BIG part of our identity.
And I'm not asking what you think our Board will or wont do.
 
@kingrobbie said in [The WT Identity](/post/1460060) said:
@turkeytiger03 said in [The WT Identity](/post/1459861) said:
@coivtny said in [The WT Identity](/post/1458236) said:
That stuff rings a bell with me but not with the players of today. Hope he enjoyed writing it because he's obviously passionate but, other than making him feel good, it's a waste of effort. Around half today's players are Polynesian in origin and they don't relate to this stuff. The others are from all over the place and it just won't resonate with them.

This is a very valid point, I would even say more than half Polynesian. Don’t really know the motivation for these guys, but we really need to know and fast. Maybe we need a coach that can motivate them better than what Madge can. Stephen Kearney anyone ??

Lot of the Polynesian boys come from intense households with tons of kids running around and being screamed and yelled at is the norm. Madge’s screaming rants, while I’m sure well-intentioned are literally white noise to them, they probably don’t even hear it.

A coach like Cleary has taken a different approach to coaching and garnered better results with a predominately Polynesian group.

Arguably the best coach in the business, Bellamy, yells, screams, spits, I guess all coaches have there own ways? Though I wonder what Ivan would be like when he is under the pump?
 
@tiger_bond said in [The WT Identity](/post/1459856) said:
After reading most comments here I realised the real problem is that it starts with our fans who are entrenched in “cancel culture” (I don’t like what is being said so forget it and move on)

The article is about how the club’s we followed had a soul and an identity (no matter which side you came from) and that we need to make changes to recapture that, some so-called die hard fans on this forum like to dismiss other people’s experiences because it doesn’t suit them.

Our club is so divided under the surface, it’s like a married couple that hates each other but are only staying together for the children.

As long as we keep demonising each other’s origins we will stay a club that just makes up numbers like we have the last 10 years.

I agree.

Feel sorry fir those who don't see we are the total sum of our past. Both sides.

16 premierships and over 200 years of history.

It should be celebrated not divided and ignored!
 
It would be nice if the club sent the young girl a signed jersey to wear to the games.So much passion for her team,she will be a Tigers supporter for life.
 
@magpies1963 said in [The WT Identity](/post/1460248) said:
A seriously well written and interesting history lesson post.
But what is your view for our future?
How do we get out of the hole we seem to be in as far as location/re-location is concerned?
Imo that's a BIG part of our identity.
And I'm not asking what you think our Board will or wont do.

Well said , @MAGPIES1963 , a team without an address (one homeground) would be like people of no fixed address, homelessness. .
 
@innsaneink said in [The WT Identity](/post/1459940) said:
@tiger_bond said in [The WT Identity](/post/1459856) said:
After reading most comments here I realised the real problem is that it starts with our fans who are entrenched in “cancel culture” (I don’t like what is being said so forget it and move on)

The article is about how the club’s we followed had a soul and an identity (no matter which side you came from) and that we need to make changes to recapture that, some so-called die hard fans on this forum like to dismiss other people’s experiences because it doesn’t suit them.

Our club is so divided under the surface, it’s like a married couple that hates each other but are only staying together for the children.

As long as we keep demonising each other’s origins we will stay a club that just makes up numbers like we have the last 10 years.

Spot on
Great post

We are the ugly step kids who are kept in the cupboard ....
 
@the_patriot said in [The WT Identity](/post/1460265) said:
@tiger_bond said in [The WT Identity](/post/1459856) said:
After reading most comments here I realised the real problem is that it starts with our fans who are entrenched in “cancel culture” (I don’t like what is being said so forget it and move on)

The article is about how the club’s we followed had a soul and an identity (no matter which side you came from) and that we need to make changes to recapture that, some so-called die hard fans on this forum like to dismiss other people’s experiences because it doesn’t suit them.

Our club is so divided under the surface, it’s like a married couple that hates each other but are only staying together for the children.

As long as we keep demonising each other’s origins we will stay a club that just makes up numbers like we have the last 10 years.

I agree.

Feel sorry fir those who don't see we are the total sum of our past. Both sides.

16 premierships and over 200 years of history.

It should be celebrated not divided and ignored!

Our history will never be ignored, it's in the name for crying out loud: **Wests Tigers**. However we are not the foundation clubs. We are the Wests Tigers. We are making our own identity. Robbie Farah, Benji Marshall, Brett Hodgson, et al. Plus we have new stars in the making. We have passionate fans you see at every game and on TV. The creation of the Centre of Excellence, which will be world class. We even had a TV show just about the Wests Tigers, no other club has ever done that in the history of Rugby League. New external initiatives like The Ambush, engaging the fans. The Wests Tigers are creating their own unique identity and history.
 
Back
Top