jirskyr
Well-known member
In a 1-1 strip situation where the ball hits the ground, it should be a dead ball and possession granted to whoever dives on it first. No more knock-ons from strip attempts, because it is never clear who is at fault - both players have technically touched and dropped the footy.
I would also modify the "stripping in the act of scoring" allowance that has been introduced, because it's clearly too difficult to judge what constitutes an attempt to score and what to do with the result of the strip. You should always be penalised for a 2+ man strip anywhere on the field, but put it in the rules that stripping cannot lead to a penalty try. That way teams are allowed to stop tries by whatever manner they can, but the attack gets the ball back.
For people who think the rules are too abstract and complicated, just watch a half of rugby. For people who think the refs have too much influence in our game, watch soccer and see where contentious calls can lead.
I would also modify the "stripping in the act of scoring" allowance that has been introduced, because it's clearly too difficult to judge what constitutes an attempt to score and what to do with the result of the strip. You should always be penalised for a 2+ man strip anywhere on the field, but put it in the rules that stripping cannot lead to a penalty try. That way teams are allowed to stop tries by whatever manner they can, but the attack gets the ball back.
For people who think the rules are too abstract and complicated, just watch a half of rugby. For people who think the refs have too much influence in our game, watch soccer and see where contentious calls can lead.