Thurston

@tigermaniac said:
A question for Happy and Watto. I remember years ago, seeing somewhere, a fullback with one arm, was he in the Brisbane competition, I can't remember. If so what was his name and who did he play for. What a champion effort, whoever he was.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

I thought Wests Magpies had a one-armed player in the minor grades once?

Wrong Happy… The Easts Tigers boys only needed one-arm to tackle those Panthers and Jets pansies!
 
@Tiger Watto said:
@tigermaniac said:
A question for Happy and Watto. I remember years ago, seeing somewhere, a fullback with one arm, was he in the Brisbane competition, I can't remember. If so what was his name and who did he play for. What a champion effort, whoever he was.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

I thought Wests Magpies had a one-armed player in the minor grades once?

Wrong Happy… The Easts Tigers boys only needed one-arm to tackle those Panthers and Jets pansies!

On a serious note didn't a one armed bloke play for NSW Country in the old city v country games before the City Origin games started

Was a story in the RLW I thought I remembered many years ago
 
How many times did qld beat nsw pre origin when players were made up from their competitions.

Please I'm not saying the qld comp wasn't strong but it didn't compare to the nsw comp.

And just because we don't agree with you doesn't mean we have no idea.
 
@EndlessPassion said:
How many times did qld beat nsw pre origin when players were made up from their competitions.

Please I'm not saying the qld comp wasn't strong but it didn't compare to the nsw comp.

And just because we don't agree with you doesn't mean we have no idea.

You do understand Pre Origin that the NSW team was made up of Qlders because NSW had pokies and we didn't
 
@happy tiger said:
@EndlessPassion said:
How many times did qld beat nsw pre origin when players were made up from their competitions.

Please I'm not saying the qld comp wasn't strong but it didn't compare to the nsw comp.

And just because we don't agree with you doesn't mean we have no idea.

You do understand Pre Origin that the NSW team was made up of Qlders because NSW had pokies and we didn't

Kinda like how the QLD team is now made up of NSWers. Ahh the cycle of life.

hehe, couldn't resist :laughing:
 
@happy tiger said:
@EndlessPassion said:
How many times did qld beat nsw pre origin when players were made up from their competitions.

Please I'm not saying the qld comp wasn't strong but it didn't compare to the nsw comp.

And just because we don't agree with you doesn't mean we have no idea.

You do understand Pre Origin that the NSW team was made up of Qlders because NSW had pokies and we didn't

Yes I understand that so if the best qld players are playing in the nsw comp means that the better comp was the nswrl. Right?
 
@EndlessPassion said:
@happy tiger said:
@EndlessPassion said:
How many times did qld beat nsw pre origin when players were made up from their competitions.

Please I'm not saying the qld comp wasn't strong but it didn't compare to the nsw comp.

And just because we don't agree with you doesn't mean we have no idea.

You do understand Pre Origin that the NSW team was made up of Qlders because NSW had pokies and we didn't

Yes I understand that so if the best qld players are playing in the nsw comp means that the better comp was the nswrl. Right?

nup… It probably meant your comp was weak and you needed to buy talent! :smiley:
 
I agree with Endless passion… The old qld comp was not as good as the old nswrl comp. hence the reason nsw dominated qld pre origin

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@Tiger Watto said:
@EndlessPassion said:
@happy tiger said:
@EndlessPassion said:
How many times did qld beat nsw pre origin when players were made up from their competitions.

Please I'm not saying the qld comp wasn't strong but it didn't compare to the nsw comp.

And just because we don't agree with you doesn't mean we have no idea.

You do understand Pre Origin that the NSW team was made up of Qlders because NSW had pokies and we didn't

Yes I understand that so if the best qld players are playing in the nsw comp means that the better comp was the nswrl. Right?

nup… It probably meant your comp was weak and you needed to buy talent! :smiley:

Money talks ah.
 
["]

@Tiger Watto said:
@EndlessPassion said:
@happy tiger said:
@EndlessPassion said:
How many times did qld beat nsw pre origin when players were made up from their competitions.

Please I'm not saying the qld comp wasn't strong but it didn't compare to the nsw comp.

And just because we don't agree with you doesn't mean we have no idea.

You do understand Pre Origin that the NSW team was made up of Qlders because NSW had pokies and we didn't

Yes I understand that so if the best qld players are playing in the nsw comp means that the better comp was the nswrl. Right?

nup… It probably meant your comp was weak and you needed to buy talent! :smiley:

Money talks ah.
And BS walks , see ya :roll
 
This would have to be the stupidest thread I have read on here for a while.
JT is the most over-rated of all time? Wally shouldnt be an immortal? NSWRL was so dominant before 1980, not because they had a lot of great QLDers in the team, but merely the better comp?

Thanks for the laugh kiddies…. Save your breath Watto and Happy. You can not win an argument against the ignorant.
 
@stryker said:
This would have to be the stupidest thread I have read on here for a while.
JT is the most over-rated of all time? Wally shouldnt be an immortal? NSWRL was so dominant before 1980, not because they had a lot of great QLDers in the team, but merely the better comp?

Thanks for the laugh kiddies…. Save your breath Watto and Happy. You can not win an argument against the ignorant.

No JT is up there with the best, Wally should be an immortal. Yes NSW did have a team of out-of-staters before 1980 - just like queensland has been doing since SOO started.

They have had more kiwis, PNGians and NSWelshman since then than they have Qlders

Its been a complete reversal

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
apart from this thread, i've never ever heard of thurston being considered overrated by anyone tbh

would thurston be the most respected rep player atm? esp since the retirement of lockyer and petro?
 
Happy Tiger i think the fellow you are thinking about was a Fullback & his name was Kerry Gibson, I am almost positive about his name.
 
@stryker said:
Geeze he is over rated that Thurston….said everyone who knows zero about rugby league!

Have you watched the cowboys this year? He's a huge reason for their demise. Playing well in a team of superstars doesn't change the fact that he's way out of form.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@Blake93 said:
@stryker said:
Geeze he is over rated that Thurston….said everyone who knows zero about rugby league!

Have you watched the cowboys this year? He's a huge reason for their demise. Playing well in a team of superstars doesn't change the fact that he's way out of form.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

"Playing well in a team of superstars". Ie, he plays well when he's got good people around him. Which is roughly the same thing as saying he plays badly with a bad team. Maybe it's not him, it's just that they're not a good team?

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@wtigers said:
@Blake93 said:
@stryker said:
Geeze he is over rated that Thurston….said everyone who knows zero about rugby league!

Have you watched the cowboys this year? He's a huge reason for their demise. Playing well in a team of superstars doesn't change the fact that he's way out of form.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

"Playing well in a team of superstars". Ie, he plays well when he's got good people around him. Which is roughly the same thing as saying he plays badly with a bad team. Maybe it's not him, it's just that they're not a good team?

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

That's exactly what I'm saying. The elite players play well even when the rest of the team isn't. Thurston has been average all year except game II and III.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
Back
Top