TIGERS Rozelle Development

@Byron Bay Fan said:
@Abraham said:
@Byron Bay Fan said:
Going back to square one, before the state govt intervention did the Balmain Tigers have any serious financial problems?

Before the Leagues Club fiasco, no.

I don't believe they had any financial difficulty.

That was the answer I was after thanks very much. Well indeed an unfortunate story for the club supporting a dedicated outfit and fans.

not sure what you'r talking about Abraham, as Geo pointed out above, the leagues club was losing millions of dollars each year, up to $20 something million by the sale, that's why they agreed to the sale in the first place as they would have gone bust sooner or later in any case!
 
Balmain Boy:
not sure what you'r talking about Abraham, as Geo pointed out above, the leagues club was losing millions of dollars each year, up to $20 something million by the sale, that's why they agreed to the sale in the first place as they would have gone bust sooner or later in any case!

But were these initial losses due to Star Casino opening in mid nineties and maybe pokies in pubs?. They should not have let a for-profit casino sabotage a community non-profit leagues club. I have always been against gambling in private hands including hotels having pokies. That helped the demise.
 
@Curaeus said:
I suspect Harry might be prepared, at best, to help Balmain get past their immediate repayment obligations to the NRL to avoid them having to forfeit their share of the JV next year. That said, unless the horrible mess that is the present Rozelle (un)development can be fixed quickly, they won't last long after that anyway. It's a great shame to see an old and proud club reduced to this!

He should have stepped up earlier than this. The problem is he won't fund the leagues club because Rozelle Village (his competition) would essentially be a beneficiary of this due to the fact they might receive any left over 'assets' if the leagues went into administration.

Funding Balmain FC directly would only be a band-aid solution as it doesn't have the capital inflow.

If I had his money, I would have set up a new non-profit club in a commercial area in one of his properties to fund Balmain FC in perpetuity.

But even then, it keeps the merger alive and well which I think is what has held us back all these years.

It's hard to know what the solution is.
 
@Balmain Boy said:
@Byron Bay Fan said:
@Abraham said:
@Byron Bay Fan said:
Going back to square one, before the state govt intervention did the Balmain Tigers have any serious financial problems?

Before the Leagues Club fiasco, no.

I don't believe they had any financial difficulty.

That was the answer I was after thanks very much. Well indeed an unfortunate story for the club supporting a dedicated outfit and fans.

not sure what you'r talking about Abraham, as Geo pointed out above, the leagues club was losing millions of dollars each year, up to $20 something million by the sale, that's why they agreed to the sale in the first place as they would have gone bust sooner or later in any case!

Talking about before they decided to re-develop, before the Govt made them buy every property on the block, and before they were forced to vacate the premises. They weren't losing any money before then, and were trading profitably

Before the redevelopment fiasco they were paying multi-million dollar grants to the Wests Tigers out of profits the Leagues Club was making. Dig up some old Financial Reports if you can, its there in black and white.

That's what Byron was asking about, and that's the correct answer.
 
@Byron Bay Fan said:
Balmain Boy:
not sure what you'r talking about Abraham, as Geo pointed out above, the leagues club was losing millions of dollars each year, up to $20 something million by the sale, that's why they agreed to the sale in the first place as they would have gone bust sooner or later in any case!

But were these initial losses due to Star Casino opening in mid nineties and maybe pokies in pubs?. They should not have let a for-profit casino sabotage a community non-profit leagues club. I have always been against gambling in private hands including hotels having pokies. That helped the demise.

No Byron, the losses only started after they had to vacate the Rozelle premises due to State Labor's failed light rail fiasco, and then the development being stalled due to the GFC at the time. Everything snowballed since then.

Prior to that time they were a profitable leagues club.
 
If the Leagues Club were coerced/forced into buying out the surrounding properties under the guise of the introduction of the Metro, how the hell can they not take legal action against the State Government for their predicament? I mean the developer putting in ridiculously non-compliant proposals delaying the approval obviously does them no favours, but the Government pulling the rug has put them in a position they basically look like they'll never recover from.
 
@Cultured Bogan said:
If the Leagues Club were coerced/forced into buying out the surrounding properties under the guise of the introduction of the Metro, how the hell can they not take legal action against the State Government for their predicament? I mean the developer putting in ridiculously non-compliant proposals delaying the approval obviously does them no favours, but the Government pulling the rug has put them in a position they basically look like they'll never recover from.

It's a good question CB - one I've always wondered myself. When it failed, there was talk in the paper that it would probably cost hundreds of millions anyway due to contracts that had been signed.

However, I think the Tigers were still negligent for not posting security at the premises. They could have just moved back in and asked State Govt to cover that.

Given the track record of the Labor State Govt before then, it honestly falls back on the Tigers board for not protecting themselves.
 
@Cultured Bogan said:
It's just an insane situation. I don't know how the Government can't be considered remotely culpable.

I can't believe they spent nearly $500M on that metro plan, pulled the plug, and there hardly appear to have been repercussions for the government since.
 
@jirskyr said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
It's just an insane situation. I don't know how the Government can't be considered remotely culpable.

I can't believe they spent nearly $500M on that metro plan, pulled the plug, and there hardly appear to have been repercussions for the government since.

Can't blame the LNP for an ALP cluster (I'm not nailing my colours to the mast there, either.)
 
@Cultured Bogan said:
@jirskyr said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
It's just an insane situation. I don't know how the Government can't be considered remotely culpable.

I can't believe they spent nearly $500M on that metro plan, pulled the plug, and there hardly appear to have been repercussions for the government since.

Can't blame the LNP for an ALP cluster (I'm not nailing my colours to the mast there, either.)

Well get thrown out of power and it's not your fault anymore, right?
 
@jirskyr said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
@jirskyr said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
It's just an insane situation. I don't know how the Government can't be considered remotely culpable.

I can't believe they spent nearly $500M on that metro plan, pulled the plug, and there hardly appear to have been repercussions for the government since.

Can't blame the LNP for an ALP cluster (I'm not nailing my colours to the mast there, either.)

Well get thrown out of power and it's not your fault anymore, right?

What's worse is that the whole Bays Precinct down the bottom of Vic Rd is now looking at mass transport options… including a metro.
 
@jirskyr said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
@jirskyr said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
It's just an insane situation. I don't know how the Government can't be considered remotely culpable.

I can't believe they spent nearly $500M on that metro plan, pulled the plug, and there hardly appear to have been repercussions for the government since.

Can't blame the LNP for an ALP cluster (I'm not nailing my colours to the mast there, either.)

Well get thrown out of power and it's not your fault anymore, right?

Sorry, misread what you meant by that. The institution of the State Government should still be held responsible of course.
 
@Cultured Bogan said:
If the Leagues Club were coerced/forced into buying out the surrounding properties under the guise of the introduction of the Metro, how the hell can they not take legal action against the State Government for their predicament? I mean the developer putting in ridiculously non-compliant proposals delaying the approval obviously does them no favours, but the Government pulling the rug has put them in a position they basically look like they'll never recover from.

The purchasing of the properties wasn't anything to do with the Metro, but actually on the advice of Leichhardt Council in order for them to have their Masterplan approved. According to their website, this meant they had to spend $8m, the rest of the money owing to Rozelle Village comes from loans and associated interest for capital shortfalls around the time they had to move and moving/fit-out costs for Five Dock and the Markets.
 
@Cultured Bogan said:
@jirskyr said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
@jirskyr said:
I can't believe they spent nearly $500M on that metro plan, pulled the plug, and there hardly appear to have been repercussions for the government since.

Can't blame the LNP for an ALP cluster (I'm not nailing my colours to the mast there, either.)

Well get thrown out of power and it's not your fault anymore, right?

Sorry, misread what you meant by that. The institution of the State Government should still be held responsible of course.

No, you had me right first time. There is an issue in politics, particularly state politics, where the incumbent party just wants to get through to the next election. Most of what they accomplish is short-term, because they can be thrown out before major projects are seen through.

You can't bring the ALP to task because they've already been knifed for their mistakes, but it's an expensive slate to wipe.

The Libs have done the same with their downgrading of the NBN.
 
@jirskyr said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
@jirskyr said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
Can't blame the LNP for an ALP cluster (I'm not nailing my colours to the mast there, either.)

Well get thrown out of power and it's not your fault anymore, right?

Sorry, misread what you meant by that. The institution of the State Government should still be held responsible of course.

No, you had me right first time. There is an issue in politics, particularly state politics, where the incumbent party just wants to get through to the next election. Most of what they accomplish is short-term, because they can be thrown out before major projects are seen through.

You can't bring the ALP to task because they've already been knifed for their mistakes, but it's an expensive slate to wipe.

The Libs have done the same with their downgrading of the NBN.

Ah OK, fair enough :slight_smile:
 
@Benjirific said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
If the Leagues Club were coerced/forced into buying out the surrounding properties under the guise of the introduction of the Metro, how the hell can they not take legal action against the State Government for their predicament? I mean the developer putting in ridiculously non-compliant proposals delaying the approval obviously does them no favours, but the Government pulling the rug has put them in a position they basically look like they'll never recover from.

The purchasing of the properties wasn't anything to do with the Metro, but actually on the advice of Leichhardt Council in order for them to have their Masterplan approved. According to their website, this meant they had to spend $8m, the rest of the money owing to Rozelle Village comes from loans and associated interest for capital shortfalls around the time they had to move and moving/fit-out costs for Five Dock and the Markets.

Fair enough Benjirific, I'm not abreast of all the details, there was obviously a reason why the government weren't taken to court and your comments bring a lot of sense about it.
 
Old news I know but Darcy does make sense…
\
\
In response to today's decision by administrators of the Balmain Tigers to hold a rally, on March 2nd, in support of skyscrapers in Rozelle, Leichhardt Mayor Darcy Byrne has released an open letter to Club members warning them against being exploited by developers.

SEE OPEN LETTER TO TIGERS MEMBERS AND SUPPORTERS BELOW.

“Rozelle Village and its part owner Benny Elias, are playing on the passions of Tigers fans for financial gain” Councillor Byrne said.

“I’m a passionate supporter of the Tigers and it is simply exploitation of the fans for the Club to organise a rally while the developers still refuse to give any written guarantee that the club will have a permanent home in the new development.

“As it stands, this redevelopment will deliver huge profits for Mr Elias and his mates, but not a single dollar for the club” said Cr Byrne.

Investigations by journalists have unearthed evidence that the Club is paying above market interest rates and excessive administration fees on a loan from Rozelle Village that has forced the Tigers into millions of dollars of debt.

“It’s time for Club administrators to clearly explain to members why they should support a deal that has so few benefits for the Club" said Cr Byrne.

“I will continue to fight for a sensible redevelopment that allows the leagues club to return to Rozelle and for the Tigers to continue to play at their spiritual home of Leichhardt Oval.”

ENDS

Media contact: Darcy Byrne - 0404528277
\
\
\
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIGERS FANS

I write to you not as the Mayor of Leichhardt but as a lifelong supporter of the mighty Balmain Tigers. When he passed away my father wanted his ashes scattered at Leichhardt Oval. Like so many of you, support for the Tigers is part of our family tradition.

That is why I am so concerned with how the Club's loyal supporters are being exploited and misled by international developers Rozelle Village. The Club’s administrators are now asking you to turn out for a rally to support the skyscraper proposal in Rozelle. Before giving them your
support you deserve answers to these questions.

1\. Why won't Rozelle Village provide a written guarantee that the Leagues Club can have a permanent home in their skyscrapers?

The developers claim to be ‘bringing the Tigers home’ but at this stage the Club will only be given a temporary space for 15 years, while paying full commercial rents. A fair deal would see the Club given a 100 year lease - rent free!

2\. Why will the Club not receive a cent from the development while Benny Elias and his partners make millions?

Our Club will not receive any cash payment if the development proceeds despite the fact that the developers admit they stand to make hundreds of millions of dollars in profit. This is in stark contrast to the deal negotiated by Cronulla Leagues Club for their redevelopment that
guarantees them a share of the profits and long term financial security. Media reports suggest Rozelle Village has already received hundreds of thousands of dollars in interest repayments from our Club.

3\. Why is Eddie Obeid dragging our proud Club's name through the mud?

Being a Tiger is about having integrity. It has been revealed at the ICAC hearings that Eddie Obeid has been lobbying behind closed doors to have the skyscrapers approved. Why is he involved? Now his business associate Nick Di Girolamo has been appointed Chairman of Wests Tigers. Surely our Club should keep as far away as possible from Eddie Obeid and his mates.

4\. Why skyscrapers?

The developer already has a rezoning from Leichhardt Council that would allow them to build up to 12 storeys, they could bring in an application tomorrow that would be approved. Why are they insisting on having a development so big it has been opposed by Roads and Maritime services and does not comply with a single one of the State Government's planning controls? Through their greed Rozelle Village have alienated the vast majority of local residents including many of the Club's most loyal supporters. The very people the Club will depend on when it returns.

5\. Is the current Club Administration planning to walk away from Leichhardt Oval?

We have been told this monstrous proposal is about bringing the boys home but at the same time the Wests Tigers administrators have suggested this will be our last year playing at Leichhardt Oval. Why are they willing to lobby so hard for the profits of Benny and his mates while walking away from our spiritual home without a fight?

Every loyal member and supporter of our Club deserves answers to these questions before we put our trust in Rozelle Village. Otherwise we are just being exploited.

Yours sincerely,
Darcy Byrne
Mayor of Leichhardt
 
How Benny Elias put the bite on the Tigers
Date
June 30, 2012

Kelly Burke
Big-money deals spearheaded by a rugby league champion have left Balmain Leagues Club with mounting debts

Lobbying … Ben Elias promotes the development at a council meeting. Photo: Bob Pearce

HE IS the instantly recognisable face of the "Bring the Tigers Home" campaign and has been hailed as the saviour of the NRL team's struggling club.

But a series of deals with Ben Elias has plunged the Balmain Leagues Club into inextricable debt, after it handed all its assets to its former star Test hooker.

Mr Elias has been lobbying heavily for the controversial $300 million Rozelle Village development on the club's former site, which is now before the state government's independent Planning Assessment Commission. Despite strong opposition from residents who argue that three towers, one as high as 32 storeys, are a gross overdevelopment of the site, more than 7000 letters of support for the proposal have been sent to the commission. This has been largely due to the efforts of Mr Elias, who has been greeting fans at matches and urging them to sign his petition.

What Mr Elias has failed to tell fans is that he owns a 50 per cent stake in the company behind the development, and stands to make millions if it goes ahead. And that company, which bought the club's property for $1 plus the clearing of a $23.5 million debt, is earning hundreds of thousands of dollars from crippling fees charged on loans to the club, which is back in the red to the tune of almost $9 million.

A company solely owned by Mr Elias, Fordmont Pty Ltd, continues to hold half the shares of Rozelle Village, 16 months after he resigned as a director of Rozelle Village.

''Mind your own bloody business'', Mr Elias told the Herald when first asked about Fordmont's continued involvement in Rozelle Village two weeks ago. Earlier this week, he said: ''I have nothing to say to you about Rozelle Village.''

Late yesterday he responded to questions from the Herald with a statement saying he had disclosed his position to the club's board and members.

The president of the club, David Trodden, has declined to be interviewed by the Herald.

According to documents obtained by the Herald, while Mr Elias was still on the club's board in March 2009 his company Balmain Development signed a heads of agreement with Mr Trodden and the club's then chief executive, Tim Camiller, to take over the proposed redevelopment of the club. In contravention of the Registered Clubs Act, there was no public auction or open tender for the project.

At that time, Mr Elias's company was being financed by Harry Triguboff's former son-in-law, Alex Lankry. Mr Lankry has told the Herald he agreed to finance the redevelopment in partnership with Mr Elias, who had no capital, in return for a 70 per cent stake in Balmain Development. But after sinking more than $400,000 into the club, Mr Lankry said, he told Mr Elias he would provide no further funds because the share transfer hadn't happened.

While Mr Lankry sought legal advice over how to salvage his investment, Mr Elias sought capital elsewhere, from Kemmori ''Alex'' Yasumoto, a Japanese property developer who made his fortune erecting serviced apartment towers in Hong Kong. The Australian link was the Double Bay real estate agent Ian Wright. Together the two men own Pacific Link Investment, the company behind Pacific Balmain, which now jointly owns Rozelle Village Pty Ltd with Mr Elias's company, Fordmont.

Pacific Link had the capital-raising capacity, Mr Elias had the connections and trust of the club, vital for the redevelopment deal.

Just six days after resigning as a club director, Mr Elias signed a deal with Pacific Link under which he pocketed more than $600,000 for what had been previously spent on the stalled development, a sum Mr Lankry alleges included his money, which he is still trying to recoup.

Mr Elias's job, according to the agreement, would be to broker a deal with the club, which was now bleeding $100,000 a month through previous risky property acquisitions and declining patronage of its poker machines.

A week after the Pacific Link deal was signed, Balmain Development became Rozelle Village Pty Ltd, with Mr Elias and Mr Wright its sole directors.

By late May the club was on the verge of agreeing to hand its assets and debts to Rozelle Village, in return for a guaranteed new home in the redevelopment in the form of a 15-year lease and a 15-year option.

But by this stage Rozelle Village not only stood to make millions from the residential and commercial redevelopment of the club site. The company was negotiating with the state government, which had announced plans to build a $5.3 billion, seven-kilometre CBD Metro between Central and Rozelle.

Rozelle Village stood to make as much as $30 million over five years by leasing part of the development's underground space to the metro project. Mr Wright urged Mr Elias in an email to speed up the negotiations with the club. The deal was eventually endorsed at a members' meeting on August 26.

''Really there is no alternative,'' Mr Elias told the meeting. ''The only option if the proposal is voted down is to close the leagues club doors.''

The Daily Telegraph enthused: ''Balmain's favourite son Benny Elias has saved his greatest contribution to the club until his retirement.'' The paper quoted Mr Elias saying he was ''proud to be contributing to a project that was so close to his heart''.

One resident, Mark Wallis, recalls he was one of only a handful of members uncomfortable with the Elias alliance.

''I was shouted down and booed when I disagreed with what the board was telling us, then David Trodden snatched the microphone off me. The message the board was giving was that Benny was acting in the club's best interest and that of course we should trust him … we were told he was a white knight.''

Members were permitted to see a copy of the call option on display at the club but the board banned anyone from making copies and taking them away to read the fine print. Consequently, few of the members would have been aware that the deal with Rozelle Village would immediately plunge the club back into debt, despite handing over all its land to the company.

Under the terms of the agreement Rozelle Village would immediately lend the club $4.5 million over three years to continue operating, with interest charged at commercial rates. And there was another loan, not mentioned in the agreement put before the members on August 26, but approved by the club's board three months later. Mr Elias and Mr Wright would lend the club $3.1 million to help with moving costs when it made way for the redevelopment.

According to correspondence obtained by the Herald sent to Mr Trodden, and Mr Camiller by Rozelle Village's then project manager, Moss Akbarian, the loan was initially presented by Mr Elias and Mr Wright as a gesture of goodwill from Mr Yasumoto, with his philanthropic credentials fully cited and his passion to see the club and the community it served thrive.

However, the club learnt it was to be charged market rate interest plus 2 per cent on the loan. The club would also be obliged to pay Mr Elias and Mr Wright a $180,000 ''application fee'', plus an additional $230,000 ''administration fee'' every year for the duration of the loan. On top of that, the business partners would receive an additional $310,000 from the club, should it suddenly become miraculously flush with funds and pay the loan out early.

''These fees were introduced by Ben Elias on the basis that the relocation loan to the club was unsecured and the club should not get away with paying the normal interest rates,'' Mr Akbarian's letter of explanation to the club states.

The Herald understands there was discussion over reversing the loan fees, but it is unclear if this ever happened. If the terms of the relocation loan were adhered to, the club by now has paid Rozelle Village almost $1 million in administration fees alone, on a $3.1 million loan attracting commercial rates of interest.

From what can be gathered from the club's 2011 annual report, very little if any of the $4.1 million operating loan has been paid and the club has capitalised the loan's interest. As of last October, the club had unsecured non-current loans of more than $8.5 million owing to Rozelle Village and for 2011 incurred a $2.2 million loss.

On the surface, it appeared by then that Mr Elias had ceased his business relationship with Mr Wright and Mr Yasumoto, having resigned as a director of Rozelle Village in December 2010\. He appeared to be lobbying for the development on behalf of the club once more.

Last September Mr Elias refused to comment when asked if he was still involved in Rozelle Village, saying only that he was turning his business interests to a truck stop development in Toowoomba with his good mate Mick Doohan, the grand prix motorcycle champion.

But Mr Wright has told the Herald and The Australian Mr Elias was ''not involved at all'' in the Rozelle Village company.

As of close of business yesterday, Mr Elias's company Fordmont remained the 50 per cent owner of Rozelle Village.

In a statement received by the Herald late yesterday, Mr Trodden said all club-audited finances, including loans and repayments, had been documented and distributed to members in a transparent process. ''Ben Elias's relationship with Balmain Leagues is not a business one - he is one of our greatest players and most hardworking supporters,'' he said.

''I have been heartened by the continued support from the many thousands of fans and the community who have independently expressed their support for the development which will bring the Tigers home to Balmain.''

Mr Elias responded in writing late yesterday to a series of questions on his involvement with Rozelle Village: ''I am a former director but left this position over 12 months ago to pursue other activity.''

He had made a full disclosure ''of my former position'' to the club board and members at the meeting which overwhelmingly voted in favour of the redevelopment. Yet according to ASIC documents, Mr Elias did not stand down as a director of Rozelle Village until almost four months after that meeting.

''I am committed to seeing the Tigers return to Rozelle and openly encourage all fans to support the development,'' he said.

Apology to David Trodden
The article "How Benny Elias put the bite on the Tigers" (June 30, 2012) concerned the proposed development of the Balmain Leagues Club site. The then chairman of the club, David Trodden, has complained that the article criticised his management of the club’s affairs in relation to the proposed development. The Herald accepts that Mr Trodden acted properly and in the best interests of the club at all times, withdraws any suggestion to the contrary and apologises to Mr Trodden for any hurt and embarrassment caused by the article.
\
\
\
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/how-benny-elias-put-the-bite-on-the-tigers-20120629-21822.html#ixzz3tjZ4mwxL
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook
 
@Byron Bay Fan said:
How Benny Elias put the bite on the Tigers
Date
June 30, 2012

Kelly Burke
Big-money deals spearheaded by a rugby league champion have left Balmain Leagues Club with mounting debts

Lobbying … Ben Elias promotes the development at a council meeting. Photo: Bob Pearce

HE IS the instantly recognisable face of the "Bring the Tigers Home" campaign and has been hailed as the saviour of the NRL team's struggling club.

But a series of deals with Ben Elias has plunged the Balmain Leagues Club into inextricable debt, after it handed all its assets to its former star Test hooker.

Mr Elias has been lobbying heavily for the controversial $300 million Rozelle Village development on the club's former site, which is now before the state government's independent Planning Assessment Commission. Despite strong opposition from residents who argue that three towers, one as high as 32 storeys, are a gross overdevelopment of the site, more than 7000 letters of support for the proposal have been sent to the commission. This has been largely due to the efforts of Mr Elias, who has been greeting fans at matches and urging them to sign his petition.

What Mr Elias has failed to tell fans is that he owns a 50 per cent stake in the company behind the development, and stands to make millions if it goes ahead. And that company, which bought the club's property for $1 plus the clearing of a $23.5 million debt, is earning hundreds of thousands of dollars from crippling fees charged on loans to the club, which is back in the red to the tune of almost $9 million.

A company solely owned by Mr Elias, Fordmont Pty Ltd, continues to hold half the shares of Rozelle Village, 16 months after he resigned as a director of Rozelle Village.

''Mind your own bloody business'', Mr Elias told the Herald when first asked about Fordmont's continued involvement in Rozelle Village two weeks ago. Earlier this week, he said: ''I have nothing to say to you about Rozelle Village.''

Late yesterday he responded to questions from the Herald with a statement saying he had disclosed his position to the club's board and members.

The president of the club, David Trodden, has declined to be interviewed by the Herald.

According to documents obtained by the Herald, while Mr Elias was still on the club's board in March 2009 his company Balmain Development signed a heads of agreement with Mr Trodden and the club's then chief executive, Tim Camiller, to take over the proposed redevelopment of the club. In contravention of the Registered Clubs Act, there was no public auction or open tender for the project.

At that time, Mr Elias's company was being financed by Harry Triguboff's former son-in-law, Alex Lankry. Mr Lankry has told the Herald he agreed to finance the redevelopment in partnership with Mr Elias, who had no capital, in return for a 70 per cent stake in Balmain Development. But after sinking more than $400,000 into the club, Mr Lankry said, he told Mr Elias he would provide no further funds because the share transfer hadn't happened.

While Mr Lankry sought legal advice over how to salvage his investment, Mr Elias sought capital elsewhere, from Kemmori ''Alex'' Yasumoto, a Japanese property developer who made his fortune erecting serviced apartment towers in Hong Kong. The Australian link was the Double Bay real estate agent Ian Wright. Together the two men own Pacific Link Investment, the company behind Pacific Balmain, which now jointly owns Rozelle Village Pty Ltd with Mr Elias's company, Fordmont.

Pacific Link had the capital-raising capacity, Mr Elias had the connections and trust of the club, vital for the redevelopment deal.

Just six days after resigning as a club director, Mr Elias signed a deal with Pacific Link under which he pocketed more than $600,000 for what had been previously spent on the stalled development, a sum Mr Lankry alleges included his money, which he is still trying to recoup.

Mr Elias's job, according to the agreement, would be to broker a deal with the club, which was now bleeding $100,000 a month through previous risky property acquisitions and declining patronage of its poker machines.

A week after the Pacific Link deal was signed, Balmain Development became Rozelle Village Pty Ltd, with Mr Elias and Mr Wright its sole directors.

By late May the club was on the verge of agreeing to hand its assets and debts to Rozelle Village, in return for a guaranteed new home in the redevelopment in the form of a 15-year lease and a 15-year option.

But by this stage Rozelle Village not only stood to make millions from the residential and commercial redevelopment of the club site. The company was negotiating with the state government, which had announced plans to build a $5.3 billion, seven-kilometre CBD Metro between Central and Rozelle.

Rozelle Village stood to make as much as $30 million over five years by leasing part of the development's underground space to the metro project. Mr Wright urged Mr Elias in an email to speed up the negotiations with the club. The deal was eventually endorsed at a members' meeting on August 26.

''Really there is no alternative,'' Mr Elias told the meeting. ''The only option if the proposal is voted down is to close the leagues club doors.''

The Daily Telegraph enthused: ''Balmain's favourite son Benny Elias has saved his greatest contribution to the club until his retirement.'' The paper quoted Mr Elias saying he was ''proud to be contributing to a project that was so close to his heart''.

One resident, Mark Wallis, recalls he was one of only a handful of members uncomfortable with the Elias alliance.

''I was shouted down and booed when I disagreed with what the board was telling us, then David Trodden snatched the microphone off me. The message the board was giving was that Benny was acting in the club's best interest and that of course we should trust him … we were told he was a white knight.''

Members were permitted to see a copy of the call option on display at the club but the board banned anyone from making copies and taking them away to read the fine print. Consequently, few of the members would have been aware that the deal with Rozelle Village would immediately plunge the club back into debt, despite handing over all its land to the company.

Under the terms of the agreement Rozelle Village would immediately lend the club $4.5 million over three years to continue operating, with interest charged at commercial rates. And there was another loan, not mentioned in the agreement put before the members on August 26, but approved by the club's board three months later. Mr Elias and Mr Wright would lend the club $3.1 million to help with moving costs when it made way for the redevelopment.

According to correspondence obtained by the Herald sent to Mr Trodden, and Mr Camiller by Rozelle Village's then project manager, Moss Akbarian, the loan was initially presented by Mr Elias and Mr Wright as a gesture of goodwill from Mr Yasumoto, with his philanthropic credentials fully cited and his passion to see the club and the community it served thrive.

However, the club learnt it was to be charged market rate interest plus 2 per cent on the loan. The club would also be obliged to pay Mr Elias and Mr Wright a $180,000 ''application fee'', plus an additional $230,000 ''administration fee'' every year for the duration of the loan. On top of that, the business partners would receive an additional $310,000 from the club, should it suddenly become miraculously flush with funds and pay the loan out early.

''These fees were introduced by Ben Elias on the basis that the relocation loan to the club was unsecured and the club should not get away with paying the normal interest rates,'' Mr Akbarian's letter of explanation to the club states.

The Herald understands there was discussion over reversing the loan fees, but it is unclear if this ever happened. If the terms of the relocation loan were adhered to, the club by now has paid Rozelle Village almost $1 million in administration fees alone, on a $3.1 million loan attracting commercial rates of interest.

From what can be gathered from the club's 2011 annual report, very little if any of the $4.1 million operating loan has been paid and the club has capitalised the loan's interest. As of last October, the club had unsecured non-current loans of more than $8.5 million owing to Rozelle Village and for 2011 incurred a $2.2 million loss.

On the surface, it appeared by then that Mr Elias had ceased his business relationship with Mr Wright and Mr Yasumoto, having resigned as a director of Rozelle Village in December 2010\. He appeared to be lobbying for the development on behalf of the club once more.

Last September Mr Elias refused to comment when asked if he was still involved in Rozelle Village, saying only that he was turning his business interests to a truck stop development in Toowoomba with his good mate Mick Doohan, the grand prix motorcycle champion.

But Mr Wright has told the Herald and The Australian Mr Elias was ''not involved at all'' in the Rozelle Village company.

As of close of business yesterday, Mr Elias's company Fordmont remained the 50 per cent owner of Rozelle Village.

In a statement received by the Herald late yesterday, Mr Trodden said all club-audited finances, including loans and repayments, had been documented and distributed to members in a transparent process. ''Ben Elias's relationship with Balmain Leagues is not a business one - he is one of our greatest players and most hardworking supporters,'' he said.

''I have been heartened by the continued support from the many thousands of fans and the community who have independently expressed their support for the development which will bring the Tigers home to Balmain.''

Mr Elias responded in writing late yesterday to a series of questions on his involvement with Rozelle Village: ''I am a former director but left this position over 12 months ago to pursue other activity.''

He had made a full disclosure ''of my former position'' to the club board and members at the meeting which overwhelmingly voted in favour of the redevelopment. Yet according to ASIC documents, Mr Elias did not stand down as a director of Rozelle Village until almost four months after that meeting.

''I am committed to seeing the Tigers return to Rozelle and openly encourage all fans to support the development,'' he said.

Apology to David Trodden
The article "How Benny Elias put the bite on the Tigers" (June 30, 2012) concerned the proposed development of the Balmain Leagues Club site. The then chairman of the club, David Trodden, has complained that the article criticised his management of the club’s affairs in relation to the proposed development. The Herald accepts that Mr Trodden acted properly and in the best interests of the club at all times, withdraws any suggestion to the contrary and apologises to Mr Trodden for any hurt and embarrassment caused by the article.
\
\
\
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/how-benny-elias-put-the-bite-on-the-tigers-20120629-21822.html#ixzz3tjZ4mwxL
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook

I think the fact they had to print an apology says everything that needs to be said about this story - they don't apologise/retract lightly.

I wouldn't take too much of it seriously, from memory the club put out a statement the next week refuting the majority of the claims.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top