Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who are they?Sharks have 8 players in the first grade squad that have played together from Harold matt's....this to me is the most glaring difference between them and the Tigers.
My bad...they started playing 6 years ago when they won NSW cup with Newtown Jets, still impressive, that 8 have come through and are all solid first graders with 6 years of experience playing together at the highest levels.Who are they?
I’ve been saying to a sharkies mate for years that the Sharks will be the next Penrith dynasty style club. I wonder if they will go all the way this year?
Cheers, I recall that as well. A few like Wilton, Brailey, Mulitolo and Trindle would be have been in lower grades again.My bad...they started playing 6 years ago when they won NSW cup with Newtown Jets, still impressive, that 8 have come through and are all solid first graders with 6 years of experience playing together at the highest levels.
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/ei...special-grand-final-bond-20250918-p5mw85.html
View attachment 27820
Turns out in 2018 Jets made the NSWCup GF with 5 current NRL 17 players.My bad...they started playing 6 years ago when they won NSW cup with Newtown Jets, still impressive, that 8 have come through and are all solid first graders with 6 years of experience playing together at the highest levels.
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/ei...special-grand-final-bond-20250918-p5mw85.html
View attachment 27820
I wouldn't go over the top, in:Sharks are one of the best run clubs in the league. The geographical size of their catchment is small but they are constantly producing high quality NRL level players. They are run well on the financial side of things too with multiple private investments performing well.
Meanwhile, we had a CEO who got himself suspended for 6 months which got us a salary cap penalty. Then we decided to bring him back after that and keep him on for another 5 years. Things seemed to be doing okay stakeholder-wise, but it turned out he was fudging the numbers to make our reach seem better than it was. So overall it's been a shitshow.
I know it's been quoted a million times, but Jack Gibson said it best: "Winning starts in the front office."
Cmon...Differences ...
Sharks wear - black, white & blue,
we wear - black, white & orange.
Sharks have one home ground,
we have quite a few.
Sharks represent a well defined district,
we don’t
Sharks keep playing into September,
we don’t!
——————
The most glaring similarity however, is that the Cronulla Sharks & Wests Tigers will both be watching this years grand final from the bleachers.
When you read the above...I wouldn't go over the top, in:
2013 their head coach was suspended for supplements
2016 their Chairman was done for cocaine
2018 Sharks were done for systematic salary cap breaches dating back 4 years and by some miracle were not fingered or excluded for their 2016 premiership
2018 their CEO accidentally outed their coach for breaching his suspension, whilst attempting to self-report salary cap breaches, leading to a lengthy ban
You won't see bigger systematic FUs in the Head Office than that. Sharks are responsible for some of the all-time top-tier governance failures.
What Cronulla do have is a passionate and highly involved/athletic local population who love their tackle footy and keep producing quality juniors.
Cronulla’s won one premiership in 58 years,Cmon...
Yea, the Sharks probably will loose to Melbourne. Maybe it's close, maybe it's a wipeout.
But their 2 games from raising the trophy and if they watch the grand final from the benches, it's from a point of possible.
Were celebrating 13th!
The Sharks have Craig Fitzgibbon who gets his hands dirty and trains people hard. We have John Morris who was their coaching reject.
The Sharks are able to train in a gutsy player style and manage injuries well. We can't and haven't.
Cronulla’s won one premiership in 58 years,
we’ve done similar in 26 years.
We’ve also never felt the need to leave the porch light on for a wayward, scuba diving PM.
I’m not disputing we’re the shittiest club ever known to man (although University back in the 1920s & 1930s gave off Wests Tigers vibes) ... but I reiterate - we have won as many premierships as the mob from the Shire, and we’ve done it in half the time.Sharks' record above.
- 2005: Did not make the finals
- 2006: Finals appearance
- 2007: Finals appearance
- 2008: Finals appearance
- 2009: Finals appearance
- 2010: Finals appearance
- 2011: Finals appearance
- 2012: Finals appearance
- 2013: Finals appearance
- 2014: Did not make the finals
- 2015: Finals appearance
- 2016: Premiership winner
- 2017: Finals appearance
- 2018: Finals appearance
- 2019: Finals appearance
- 2020: Did not make the finals
- 2021: Finals appearance
- 2022: Finals appearance
- 2023: Finals appearance
- 2024: Finals appearance
- 2025: Finals appereance
Since 2005, we've made it only 3 times.
Just sayin...
Your list isn’t accurate. Sharks didn’t play finals in 2006, 07, 09, 10 and 11. Yeah they’ve been better then us in recent times but please be accurate when trying to make points instead of lying.Sharks' record above.
- 2005: Did not make the finals
- 2006: Finals appearance
- 2007: Finals appearance
- 2008: Finals appearance
- 2009: Finals appearance
- 2010: Finals appearance
- 2011: Finals appearance
- 2012: Finals appearance
- 2013: Finals appearance
- 2014: Did not make the finals
- 2015: Finals appearance
- 2016: Premiership winner
- 2017: Finals appearance
- 2018: Finals appearance
- 2019: Finals appearance
- 2020: Did not make the finals
- 2021: Finals appearance
- 2022: Finals appearance
- 2023: Finals appearance
- 2024: Finals appearance
- 2025: Finals appereance
Since 2005, we've made it only 3 times.
Just sayin...
Sorry mate, i can't see any way we are comparable to SharksQuite impressed by the Sharks last night, in their win against the Raiders, all things considered. It got me thinking though about their squad vs ours.
Whilst they have some really good players, to me the overall "value" of their squad, on paper, is not that much greater than ours. I stress on paper because that is not where games our won. However it is probably the closest top 8 team where I would consider them a valid comparison. Granted they have been together for a few years, but they have also managed to be consistent in that period, and some credit must go to Fitzgibbon for this.
I don't want to speculate about their premiership ambition, but rather your opinion as to whether the comparison holds and what the main differences between the teams are. For one thing, they seem to be very methodical, patient and able to defend solidly over prolonged periods of time.
No problems, always good to have a different perspective.Sorry mate, i can't see any way we are comparable to Sharks
If we're talking pure value id say we're inverted. They're 1-17 is probably worth what our 1-17 are being paid and our 1-17 worth what theirs are being paid. Unfortunately that leaves them a good team with plenty of cap space for quality depth and ours an ordinary team with Charlie Murray for depth.
Sure - if winning a premiership is the yardstick, that's fine. Overall, though, they just seem to have done things a little better than us ;-)I’m not disputing we’re the shittiest club ever known to man (although University back in the 1920s & 1930s gave off Wests Tigers vibes) ... but I reiterate - we have won as many premierships as the mob from the Shire, and we’ve done it in half the time.
Just sayin ... 🤷♂️
Charlie Murray didn’t cause us to miss the top 8 ?Sorry mate, i can't see any way we are comparable to Sharks
If we're talking pure value id say we're inverted. They're 1-17 is probably worth what our 1-17 are being paid and our 1-17 worth what theirs are being paid. Unfortunately that leaves them a good team with plenty of cap space for quality depth and ours an ordinary team with Charlie Murray for depth.
I didn't say he did. I pretty much said the same as you. We've paid overs or near enough across the board for our best 17 which means not only is our best 17 not that good but we also can't afford any depth of any quality to supplement it.Charlie Murray didn’t cause us to miss the top 8 ?
We love to sugarcoat it, but our highest paid players aside from Terrell May and now Taylan May are well below the standard of their equivalents at other NRL clubs.
Whether or not these players can step up and change that in 2026 remains to be seen, but I highly doubt it.
I didn't say he did. I pretty much said the same as you. We've paid overs or near enough across the board for our best 17 which means not only is our best 17 not that good but we also can't afford any depth of any quality to supplement it.
When we bring 'top-shelf" talent in, like Api K... Players learn.Compared to Sharks roster, sure they have a couple top priced players but for the most part they have very good players across their side and I'd wager mostly earning slight unders. So not only does it give them a strong team but cap space to also have strong depth.
Now unlike others I'm not to critical of many of the signing decisions since Richo has been here. I believe some had to be made to overturn the culture at the place, even if I don't think many of those players have performed as I'd hoped.
The next step now is to develop some younger players and sign some good quality tradesmen type around them on fair wages. Whether we can make the next step very much remains to be seen.