southerntiger
New member
@Masterton said:@southerntiger said:@Masterton said:@southerntiger said:Of course the size of the bet matters. Any suggestion to the contrary is nonsensical puritanical rubbish.
I disagree. I'm a believer in second chances for stupid mistakes, but you just can not open the door to match fixers. How long before a shady character is blackmailing you. "Drop the ball in the first set or this will become public." These blokes are scum and will take any advantage they can.
So, you think that betting on the Eels v Sharks is the same as betting on the Tigers to lose by 12 and then proceeding to ensure that happens? Weird ethics.
Wha? That's got nothing to do with the SIZE of the bet.
Anyways, I'm not concerned with the ethics of the matter. While sympathetic to Simona (I've done stupid things in my time), he was well aware of the possible consequences, and the game needs to protect itself.
EDIT: Rereading your post, maybe you meant the size of the wrong-doing?
I meant both. A $10,000 bet is worse than a $5 bet. A bet combined with taking a dive is worse than a bet by itself.