Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Milky said:@diedpretty said:what annoys me is that cronulla were the highest fined club in 2012 for salary cap breaches, they always crying poor and going cap in hand to the NRL for advances and then come out offering contracts to anyone on the market - the hierarchy need to police the whole thing a lot more closely.
They got fined 150k and thats without the 200k we are helping them with..so they are 350k over the cap, wow.
@alexaki said:If the dragons didn't get chase because his ESL payments would be included in their cap then the same logic would apply with the tiger shark players… Whatever we are contributing would be counted in the sharkies cap
_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
@Yossarian said:You'd think the Sharks would have learnt after Dean Collis… Ayshford is a reasonably solid NRL player but his career has stalled badly. Whether a change of club is the answer remains to be seen but I don't think his departute is anything to lose sleep over.
@Terry said:@alexaki said:If the dragons didn't get chase because his ESL payments would be included in their cap then the same logic would apply with the tiger shark players… Whatever we are contributing would be counted in the sharkies cap
_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
Bingo. Andrew Fifita is being paid 300k on the Sharks books. Tigers are just helping pay it.
@jirskyr said:@Terry said:@alexaki said:If the dragons didn't get chase because his ESL payments would be included in their cap then the same logic would apply with the tiger shark players… Whatever we are contributing would be counted in the sharkies cap
_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
Bingo. Andrew Fifita is being paid 300k on the Sharks books. Tigers are just helping pay it.
Are you sure about that? I was pretty sure Fifita isn't one of the back-loaders; Tigers had an option on him 2012 that they didn't take, which makes 2012-13 non-contracted years. He only debuted 2010, which would probably have been his first Top-25 contract, no need to backload it at that stage?
@Flippedy said:Man I am really liking they way that Mayer and Potter are going about their business. Clearing out some of the perennially average and non-performing dead wood to make way for young guys that have the Xfactor. We put up with it being the other way around for so long, under Sheens - that's why the team has been so unbalanced. Now finally someone can recognise the best players to keep and the ones that need to go - it's like a breath of fresh air!
@Flippedy said:Man I am really liking they way that Mayer and Potter are going about their business. Clearing out some of the perennially average and non-performing dead wood to make way for young guys that have the Xfactor. We put up with it being the other way around for so long, under Sheens - that's why the team has been so unbalanced. Now finally someone can recognise the best players to keep and the ones that need to go - it's like a breath of fresh air!
@tsjonathan said:After 9 pages has there been any developments on this?
@phil1986 said:@Flippedy said:Man I am really liking they way that Mayer and Potter are going about their business. Clearing out some of the perennially average and non-performing dead wood to make way for young guys that have the Xfactor. We put up with it being the other way around for so long, under Sheens - that's why the team has been so unbalanced. Now finally someone can recognise the best players to keep and the ones that need to go - it's like a breath of fresh air!
I agree completely, is feeling more honest, if I may say,
_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
@pHyR3 said:If ayshford leaves do we still have to pay the difference?? i.e, he is on 300k now, 200k at sharks or wherever. Do we have to pay 100k to the sharks cap? Same with moltzen.
Or is it different if they ask for a release?
@hammertime said:@pHyR3 said:If ayshford leaves do we still have to pay the difference?? i.e, he is on 300k now, 200k at sharks or wherever. Do we have to pay 100k to the sharks cap? Same with moltzen.
Or is it different if they ask for a release?
We would mate. Hopefully the UK might be an option for some of these blokes, then it won't have to be taken in our cap.
@phil1986 said:They are also cutting down to 12 teams in 2015, so there won't be as large a need for Aussie players as there currently is.
_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
@pHyR3 said:@phil1986 said:They are also cutting down to 12 teams in 2015, so there won't be as large a need for Aussie players as there currently is.
_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
That's probably gonna just weed out the poor players. So players of Ayshford's calibre will still be desired I think.
@Terry said:@Milky said:@diedpretty said:what annoys me is that cronulla were the highest fined club in 2012 for salary cap breaches, they always crying poor and going cap in hand to the NRL for advances and then come out offering contracts to anyone on the market - the hierarchy need to police the whole thing a lot more closely.
They got fined 150k and thats without the 200k we are helping them with..so they are 350k over the cap, wow.
This is incorrect. Massively.
The Sharks had a 30k 3rd party sponsor deal that was not known about. Once discovered, they alerted the NRL. They still got a fine, in the vasinity of 150k as someone at the club knew about it.
It wasn't exceeding the salary cap, or the 2nd tier cap. It was poor management of 3rd party deals.