Time For Benji Marshall to Retire

Ok that's it Posts that have Nothing to do with Benji have been deleted...

Only 174 days till 2020 kicks off..thank goodness..
 
so @Geo forumsupporter and administrator, what gives you the right to delete my first and last post on the previous page when both of them were directly about and in support of Benji Marshall, please explain!!!
 
So @Geo, forumsupporter and apparent administrator...why were my 1st and last posts on the previous page deleted when they were both directly in reference to Benji Marshall and positive.
 
@MAGPIES1963 said in [Time For Benji Marshall to Retire](/post/1049937) said:
So @Geo, forumsupporter and apparent administrator...why were my 1st and last posts on the previous page deleted when they were both directly in reference to Benji Marshall and positive.

There still there..
 
@MAGPIES1963 said in [Time For Benji Marshall to Retire](/post/1049863) said:
After tonight's game against Penrith @cktiger can you really tell me with honesty that Cleary had a better game than Brooks did on Thursday night?
And by the way, did you notice...Penrith's halfback [Cleary] didn't tend to win the game for his team tonight.

Exhibit A
 
@MAGPIES1963 said in [Time For Benji Marshall to Retire](/post/1049866) said:
Good quality no-nonsense post @TigersBusDriver, in support of Benji Marshall.

Exhibit B
 
@MAGPIES1963 said in [Time For Benji Marshall to Retire](/post/1049944) said:
@Geo why was my post in reply to @watersider of about 2 hours ago deleted? please explain!!!

Calm down good sir
 
@MAGPIES1963 said in [Time For Benji Marshall to Retire](/post/1049944) said:
@Geo why was my post in reply to @watersider of about 2 hours ago deleted? please explain!!!

Watersiders post had nothing to do with Benji so along with others were deleted any following post subsequently are deleted....

Anything else..?
 
Posts rarely get deleted to be honest..unless they contain direct or disguised swearing..or go totally off topic to the point they just serve to in flame arguments funnily enough either religion or politics are generally involved
 
@Geo All good mate, I actually found it pretty funny, out of everything I've posted here that was what get deleted but understand totally!
 
G'day @Geo: you've hit the nail right on the head re your "Posts rarely get deleted.....they just serve to inflame arguments funnily enough either religion or politics are generally involved".
With you saying that and admitting that you know what the consequence will be when religion or politics are introduced into any debate, then why do you allow it to happen??? Why isn't the very first mention of religion or politics deleted there and then? You as an adjudicator having the button at your fingertips to do just that should, no, 'must' realise the door is flung wide open to all sorts of garbage and insults being flung around from that very 1st post containing that inflammatory word or comment.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with 'constructive' criticism as this post is, so I reckon it's about time you adjudicators learned the difference between constructive and inflammatory.
Personally, I doubt you will actually do that as on this occasion Kul was the 1st person to introduce an inflammatory word to the debate.
As I said in a previous post, it's time you adjudicators cleaned up your act.
 
@MAGPIES1963 said in [Time For Benji Marshall to Retire](/post/1049987) said:
@Geo said:
With you saying that and admitting that you know what the consequence will be when religion or politics are introduced into any debate, then why do you allow it to happen??? Why isn't the very first mention of religion or politics deleted there and then? You as an adjudicator having the button at your fingertips to do just that should, no, 'must' realise the door is flung wide open to all sorts of garbage and insults being flung around from that very 1st post containing that inflammatory word or comment.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with 'constructive' criticism as this post is, so I reckon it's about time you adjudicators learned the difference between constructive and inflammatory.
Personally, I doubt you will actually do that as on this occasion Kul was the 1st person to introduce an inflammatory word to the debate.
As I said in a previous post, it's time you adjudicators cleaned up your act.

Ridiculous post that is off topic so will probably be deleted! Pls stick to the topic, the mods here do a very good job!
 
@MAGPIES1963 said in [Time For Benji Marshall to Retire](/post/1049987) said:
@Geo said:
With you saying that and admitting that you know what the consequence will be when religion or politics are introduced into any debate, then why do you allow it to happen??? Why isn't the very first mention of religion or politics deleted there and then? You as an adjudicator having the button at your fingertips to do just that should, no, 'must' realise the door is flung wide open to all sorts of garbage and insults being flung around from that very 1st post containing that inflammatory word or comment.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with 'constructive' criticism as this post is, so I reckon it's about time you adjudicators learned the difference between constructive and inflammatory.
Personally, I doubt you will actually do that as on this occasion Kul was the 1st person to introduce an inflammatory word to the debate.
As I said in a previous post, it's time you adjudicators cleaned up your act.

Because leeway is generally given up until a point when it becomes sesame street is why..like this thread..
 
@Geo said in [Time For Benji Marshall to Retire](/post/1049917) said:
Ok that's it Posts that have Nothing to do with Benji have been deleted...

Only 174 days till 2020 kicks off..thank goodness..

So only 175 days until we can start planning for 2021. Sorry stuck a t home with sick wife and kids has this pessimist coming out in me.
 
As you have never had a post deleted up til now @cochise, I don't like to say this, but if my post is deleted yours will be as well as yours is also off-topic.
 
@MAGPIES1963 said in [Time For Benji Marshall to Retire](/post/1050005) said:
As you have never had a post deleted up til now @cochise, I don't like to say this, but if my post is deleted yours will be as well as yours is also off-topic.

No my will be deleted as all replies to a deleted post get deleted anyway!

I think Benji should keep playing.
 
@Geo: your reply didn't answer or even refer to any of the points I raised in my post. Now you have introduced another interesting aspect ie who decides how much leeway is given? "when it becomes sesame street is why"? I feel it has only become "sesame street" because Kul introduced religion to the topic. If our adjudicators are not able to express themselves in a way that doesn't offend people, realistically what right do you have to judge others for how they express themselves?
Clear guidlines must be given and known to our forumers, so those guidelines can be carried out fully AND FAIRLY to all.
 
@MAGPIES1963 said in [Time For Benji Marshall to Retire](/post/1050011) said:
@Geo said:
Clear guidlines must be given and known to our forumers, so those guidelines can be carried out fully AND FAIRLY to all.

The topic only strayed because 1 person you took offence at Kul's comment which was a figure of speech..It got then to a point where posts where made that would have only served to continue to in-flame the situation...At that point it became necessary to delete posts..something the adjudicators really are reluctant to do...
 
Back
Top