@nelson said in [Tyrone Peachey ?](/post/1461405) said:@clontarfkid said in [Tyrone Peachey ?](/post/1461395) said:@happy_tiger said in [Tyrone Peachey ?](/post/1461375) said:@nelson said in [Tyrone Peachey ?](/post/1461346) said:@happy_tiger said in [Tyrone Peachey ?](/post/1461189) said:Can we please stop thinking about signing bloody utility players .....
So we'll just ignore players because they have utility value? He's gone well at lock for the Titans and that's where I'd want to see us play him. Who do we have on the roster for next year that is going to do a better job than him at lock (if we are looking to move on from the big body at lock)?
Isn't that Hastings spot ........bwahahahahaha
Hastings spot is 7...unless a new coach gives Brooks a much needed rebirth
..and btw,the last thing we need is more fringe first graders like Peachy..weve got a whole team of em already,with few exceptions
Its either proven NRL players ideally with some leadership skills(but not necessarily if its a key position like centre or backrow).. ,or youth.
Right so a bloke who has played 177 games of first grade, including at least 20 in each of the last 7 seasons is now within the definition of a "fringe first grader"?
Unlike Hastings/Simpkin/Liddle/Doueihi at least Peachey has actually **played** locked at an NRL level and done a decent job of it. I'm not pushing him as some kind of difference maker but he doesn't seem like he'd be a bad option at the right price...
But are we after a utility atm? I would have thought we had more priorities?