king_sirro
Well-known member
The blind love for this guy will mean my post wont be read objectively by many, so i will get hammered for this, but it has to be said.
We simply cant carry a middle player who contributes nothing to our go forward. I dont care if he makes 100 tackles a game, if we cant go forward we cant do anything. Every good side has 3 go forward men in the middle. We have for years been crying out for a pack that goes hard, yet this forum seems content on carrying a small middle player who offers zero in attack. Now for those that know me, im going to be a hypocrite here. I always argue against stats, hate them. I believe the context of the game needs to be looked at, not numbers. However, sometimes when a stat is so damming week in week out it needs to be looked at. So what i have done is look at the numbers and looked at how his attack contributes in the context of games. I dont think its come up favourable for Elijah. Have a look at the other locks in the game for average metres gained. Elijah does not even get half the metres of other locks, yet probably plays an extra 25 minutes. We are commiting suicide having him in the middle for 80 minutes.
Average Metres for 13's
Elijah Taylor 47m
Jack De Belin 116m
Josh Maguire 142m
Jake Trbojevic 116m
Nathan Brown 94m
Trent Merrin 155m
Daivid Klemmer 165m
Sio Tueakaeho 116m
Sam Burgess 153m
Dale Finucane 121m
Paul Gallen 175m
Jason Toumalolo 165m
Thats scary. Our front rowers have no help.
\
\
To have Elijah Taylor at lock for 80 minutes we would need Glenn Lazarus and Paul Harrigan as our front rowers, with Gordon Tallis and Brad Clyde on the edge. Then he could be effective.
Elijah needs to play right edge backrower the next few weeks to see how he goes. If he is innefective then the club should not take up his option for 2018.
We simply cant carry a middle player who contributes nothing to our go forward. I dont care if he makes 100 tackles a game, if we cant go forward we cant do anything. Every good side has 3 go forward men in the middle. We have for years been crying out for a pack that goes hard, yet this forum seems content on carrying a small middle player who offers zero in attack. Now for those that know me, im going to be a hypocrite here. I always argue against stats, hate them. I believe the context of the game needs to be looked at, not numbers. However, sometimes when a stat is so damming week in week out it needs to be looked at. So what i have done is look at the numbers and looked at how his attack contributes in the context of games. I dont think its come up favourable for Elijah. Have a look at the other locks in the game for average metres gained. Elijah does not even get half the metres of other locks, yet probably plays an extra 25 minutes. We are commiting suicide having him in the middle for 80 minutes.
Average Metres for 13's
Elijah Taylor 47m
Jack De Belin 116m
Josh Maguire 142m
Jake Trbojevic 116m
Nathan Brown 94m
Trent Merrin 155m
Daivid Klemmer 165m
Sio Tueakaeho 116m
Sam Burgess 153m
Dale Finucane 121m
Paul Gallen 175m
Jason Toumalolo 165m
Thats scary. Our front rowers have no help.
\
\
To have Elijah Taylor at lock for 80 minutes we would need Glenn Lazarus and Paul Harrigan as our front rowers, with Gordon Tallis and Brad Clyde on the edge. Then he could be effective.
Elijah needs to play right edge backrower the next few weeks to see how he goes. If he is innefective then the club should not take up his option for 2018.