@supercoach said in [Wests Tigers Podcast \- Hosted by Helmsey&Eddie\.](/post/1497238) said:
Another good poddy guys. Once again Iam with Joel on renewing my membership for2022.
For the first time in well over a decade I have opted not to renew as I basically lost confidence in club. Okay things may change in 2022, but we have been saying that for the past decade and to be honest I have not seen anything since the last round that gives me any confidence in the clubs leadership. I will be still going to games when I can, but It isn’t life or death anymore.
Yeah my membership is crucially important to me, it means a lot to me to have that routine and the familiarity of the people that sit around me at games.
And that’s a good thing, a good reason. It’s great to have some routine in your life. Others see different buy in motives and that’s ok too. There’s no right or wrong answer, is there mate.
No, as I just said, I can understand those that are not renewing, it is just different for me.
I'm the same as you. Will I still go to matches and watch every other game on TV? Yes. So I don't see the point in trying to penalise Tigers for bad performances by withholding my membership for something I do anyway (go to and watch Tigers). I still want to go to matches even when we aren't in the finals.
For me, locking in 8 home matches early in the year means I can work my schedule around those matches, and I have a young family, so that is important. If I was to leave it to a week-by-week decision, undoubtedly there would be a number of weeks where I would just opt to stay home, for the ease of it. That is what has happened with two of my best mates - they've basically stopped attending matches, although they are still passionate fans; it's a good TV product and they ultimately couldn't be bothered travelling out.
And back to the "withholding membership" logic, I just don't understand that at all.
Firstly, by withdrawing financial support from the club, it is harder for them to compete. That's just a fact. It doesn't matter what you think about the leadership and decision-making, less money makes a side less competitive (in the long run). Former members may say "they had my money before and were not successful", and that's a fair point, but it's also fair to realise that taking the money away doesn't make things better. So by all means, don't pay your memberships, but then perhaps think about that when Tigers can't regularly compete with clubs like Roosters and Souths.
Secondly, the idea of a "protest vote" to me is also illogical. The club already knows they need to win football matches, and the easiest way to drive revenues is to win football matches. So the incentive to win exists in all departments. If some portion of members decide to stop paying for membership, the club isn't going to suddenly react differently to losing. They aren't going to say "oh we are losing members, better start winning more". It does not send a message.
Of course all this is independent of your own financial situation. If it's difficult to afford a membership, of course you are more judicious with your spending.
So like cochise I understand why people want to discontinue their membership, but that's not how it is for me.
A couple of months ago i was accused of supporting mediocrity by continuing my membership. No I like going to the footy.
The irony of any Tigers fan accusing another of supporting mediocrity.