The_Patriot
Well-known member
Does Gamble have it in his contract that he will be named in the 21 every week. Hasn't missed one yet.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@ said:Does Gamble have it in his contract that he will be named in the 21 every week. Hasn't missed one yet.
@ said:Nofo should be gone for MWZ and Rochow should be gone for McQueen. Not too sure about Sue but I would personally have Grant there instead but Ivan must see something in Sue over Grant. I would also have Liddle as the starting hooker and E.T as the starting lock, then when Liddle comes off move E.T to hooker and Eisenhuth can come on at lock.
@ said:Not clear to me why Sue is ahead of Grant and Aloiai, anyone hazard a guess?
@ said:Does Gamble have it in his contract that he will be named in the 21 every week. Hasn't missed one yet.
@ said:Hate how the club is promoting the return of Russell Packer as the silver bullet to our 3 game losing streak….I'm sorry but its not....and I see the team is basically the same as last week... so unless there is a massive attitudinal shift by the whole team our streak will increase to 4.....
@ said:I don't understand people wanting massive changes. Fact is we don't have the best lineup in the comp and we have to do with what we have, even if losing some games. It's not like promoting a bunch of average players is going to fix it. I do understand the thought behind some changes though, like maybe Grant in over Sue..Something like that.
@ said:@ said:Nofo should be gone for MWZ and Rochow should be gone for McQueen. Not too sure about Sue but I would personally have Grant there instead but Ivan must see something in Sue over Grant. I would also have Liddle as the starting hooker and E.T as the starting lock, then when Liddle comes off move E.T to hooker and Eisenhuth can come on at lock.
All coaches have favourites this coach is no different 0&3 and still no movement .
@ said:Not clear to me why Sue is ahead of Grant and Aloiai, anyone hazard a guess?
@ said:@ said:Not clear to me why Sue is ahead of Grant and Aloiai, anyone hazard a guess?
Because he is playing better than both. Especially Aloiai. What a fraud.
@ said:@ said:@ said:Not clear to me why Sue is ahead of Grant and Aloiai, anyone hazard a guess?
Because he is playing better than both. Especially Aloiai. What a fraud.
2 dropped bells and that's it for him. Please. He is twice the player of both
@ said:@ said:@ said:Not clear to me why Sue is ahead of Grant and Aloiai, anyone hazard a guess?
Because he is playing better than both. Especially Aloiai. What a fraud.
2 dropped bells and that's it for him. Please. He is twice the player of both
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Not clear to me why Sue is ahead of Grant and Aloiai, anyone hazard a guess?
Because he is playing better than both. Especially Aloiai. What a fraud.
2 dropped bells and that's it for him. Please. He is twice the player of both
Easily.