twentyforty
Well-known member
Love how our backline is deep and in sync. Especially on the left.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's what makes it so sus, I can forgive a ref missing something but how does the bunker get it so clearly and obviously wrong as in that case? It's got to be deliberate.To be fair, the ref called penalty to tigers when Laurie had ball, it was bunker who is manufacturing results
I wondered whether he is a bit shy after two injuries but he’s staying in the thick of it.Sure.
Has a bit to work on tho.
Very green.
I wasn't a fan when it happened but he's proven me wrong so far and I'm glad he hasWorth every cent, thanks Gus
Yeah, he's been better.I wondered whether he is a bit shy after two injuries but he’s staying in the thick of it.
Good. But jeez we need an aggressive front rowers or two. Our plays the balls are slow as. We've been caught on the last with slow play the balls and Hastings and Brooks are rushing Thier kicks. Would kill for a Tuomalolo type player for our 4th tackle 🤔Love how our backline is deep and in sync. Especially on the left.
Is this another Luke Brooks thread?Can't wait till Adam replaces Brooks.
😀
Hate to say it but he shows more than JTJ.See ya later James Roberts 👋
I was hoping somebody would find this. LOLInteresting, Souths shouldn't have been able to challenge the Havili penaltyView attachment 1232
I was surprised the ref sent it up as challenging a Tigers lost ball though, rather than just interference. But then the bunker in saying no inference, should have stated that Laurie didn’t actually lose the ballTo be fair, the ref called penalty to tigers when Laurie had ball, it was bunker who is manufacturing results
He is a Sutton, six again brother say no more