What do you guy's think

tiger05premier

Well-known member
The NRL obviously doesn't like 12 v's 13\. I am referring to Tim Grant. I just think the next best option if a send off isn't a option is that if a player is taken out illegally and cannot return and the player is penalised and put on report that player should be replaced and take no further part in the game. It's still 13 on 13 on the field but they are down a bench player as well. Thoughts?
 
I would rather see an emergency player listed on the bench like the AFL, but he only replace an injured player in such circumstances as tonight.
 
Just make's this afternoon's win even greater!, an extra player on the bench means extra $$$ which unfortunately our club has little of…...............
 
The offending player should be off also. Simple. And it may make some think twice, which would be good.

Today was a further example of what a ridiculous situation the NRL has itself in uunder current rules.
 
@PYMBLEPETE said:
The offending player should be off also. Simple. And it may make some think twice, which would be good.

Today was a further example of what a ridiculous situation the NRL has itself in uunder current rules.

Agree ….. But it would be to complicated to rule if say a high shot was accidental .

What if Tedesco accidentally coat hangers a player and gets sent off ?
 
Back
Top