Aug 29, 2016 #21 851 Well-known member @ricksen said: @Russell said: Teddy won't be playing this week - end of story. So sImple really - Rankin stays. JAC is not a match winner as some like to say. He didn't win us the game against the Titans. Would have been an impressive effort if he did, given that he didn't play in that game. Click to expand... Click to expand... The Rankin love shows no bounds for some. :laughing:
@ricksen said: @Russell said: Teddy won't be playing this week - end of story. So sImple really - Rankin stays. JAC is not a match winner as some like to say. He didn't win us the game against the Titans. Would have been an impressive effort if he did, given that he didn't play in that game. Click to expand... Click to expand... The Rankin love shows no bounds for some. :laughing:
Aug 29, 2016 #22 R Russell New member @ricksen said: @Russell said: Teddy won't be playing this week - end of story. So sImple really - Rankin stays. JAC is not a match winner as some like to say. He didn't win us the game against the Titans. Would have been an impressive effort if he did, given that he didn't play in that game. Click to expand... Click to expand... That is ridiculous - you mean he has to play to be a match winner? Get rid of him immediately - banish him to Melbourne Lol.
@ricksen said: @Russell said: Teddy won't be playing this week - end of story. So sImple really - Rankin stays. JAC is not a match winner as some like to say. He didn't win us the game against the Titans. Would have been an impressive effort if he did, given that he didn't play in that game. Click to expand... Click to expand... That is ridiculous - you mean he has to play to be a match winner? Get rid of him immediately - banish him to Melbourne Lol.
Aug 29, 2016 #23 R ricksen New member You're a very harsh marker Russell, though I cannot fault your methods.
