That's why I brought it up. Matulino was outclassed on the day but maybe woodsie lifted for the last game and matulino wasn't playing the footie he would like? I dunno but it did worry me.
I didn't watch Sunday's game, but it sounds like woods out played matulino. I still think matulino is a better player and would prefer him to lead our forward pack
TBH I've watched less than a dozen Matulino games so Im not the best judge on him. Woods is very consistent in getting the team down the right end of the field , producing offloads , plays long mins and good in defence .
If Matulino is close or better I'll be more than stoked.
I think that's the right attitude to take with Woods. He isn't a team within himself he also isn't a bad forward. Halfway between a Sam Burgess and a Chris Heighington, he won't win games for you but he will do his job.
IMHO for 950k he is too expensive. Then again for 950K you get a great forward and if you buy 350k forwards instead of 400k forwards to make up for that then he may be worth it.
Des Haslier was famous for having a formula to calculate player value. Clearly it is broken now, but in it's time he was able to buy guys on the cheap and get max value out of them.
Matulino for approx 600K. Done. IMHO he is not as good as Woods but if he is 90% as good as Woods then we are far ahead. Still Woods can get the job done, people hate on him because of his media handling, but performance wise he is still an 800k NRL player IMHO.