Why Tigers’ top cats are going nowhere while side sinks to new lows

I think the question should be, how do you become a debenture holder of the Holman-Barnes Group? The supporters should pool their money.
Debenture holder is just a creditor

However reading the last yearly report they have a debenture loan of $2000 and appears all the board are debenture holders, which is rather peculiar but maybe its a tax thing.

As its a private company actually have no idea who owns HolmanBarnes group. Could be one person!
 
There is no way while Ashfield are the real bosses . Its plain to see its printed in black and white . The only way is a new major major financial backer comes forward and the NRL pulls the licence and reissues to the new backer . Probably the NRL would have conditions like maybe relocation
Then the ( insert location ) TIGERS would have a big bright future and western suburbs would have cup and flegg and ball teams run and financed by Ashfield and maybe Benny can finance a Balmain flegg or ball side .
It would be total divorce .
I'm convinced the NRL will want at least 2 more non Sydney teams and 1 less Sydney team in the next 5 years .I'm maybe biased but Central Coast being the largest unrepresented distinct area in the whole Rugby League world would get my vote
 
This guy is a bigger problem than Pascoe.

Pascoe for all the mistakes he's made, has done some good things as CEO too.

What has Hagipantelis done apart from wear his stupid fedora and run his mouth like a total clown?
Transfer wads of money in WT’s bank account
 
There is no way while Ashfield are the real bosses . Its plain to see its printed in black and white . The only way is a new major major financial backer comes forward and the NRL pulls the licence and reissues to the new backer . Probably the NRL would have conditions like maybe relocation
Then the ( insert location ) TIGERS would have a big bright future and western suburbs would have cup and flegg and ball teams run and financed by Ashfield and maybe Benny can finance a Balmain flegg or ball side .
It would be total divorce .
I'm convinced the NRL will want at least 2 more non Sydney teams and 1 less Sydney team in the next 5 years .I'm maybe biased but Central Coast being the largest unrepresented distinct area in the whole Rugby League world would get my vote
Who would be the ( insert location ) TIGERS feeder club/s? Juniors areas? Would you give up on the inner west and south west Balmain - Wests areas and go with the central coast comps if youre talking about Central Coast? Newcastle and Manly would not be happy with that.
 
Who would be the ( insert location ) TIGERS feeder club/s? Juniors areas? Would you give up on the inner west and south west Balmain - Wests areas and go with the central coast comps if youre talking about Central Coast? Newcastle and Manly would not be happy with that.
Wouldn't be me doing or wanting anything . Its basically a what if
What if the NRL want to have 2 more non Sydney teams and one less Sydney team
The NRL might target whoever is perpetually last and regarded a a bit of a basket case
If for example they want us to go to Perth they will lose me
What is not working is the status quo . All the magpie junior teams and cup side would still be there like the bears etc
Something about your forum name indicates a liking for the status quo
Nothing would make me happier than for the Wests Tigers to start winning games and making the top 8 next year then the problem will go away
 

Latest posts

Back
Top