@Pokies said:
@Russell said:
Newtown wrote
Russell you can't have if both ways i.e. you are saying don't sack the coach but take a player vote and all those players against the coach (even if they are the majority of players) sack them all.
Wait a minute Newtown - have you understood what I had to say?
What do you mean I can't have it both ways.
I want JT as the coach - he has 2 years to go on his contract.
What I said was "if there are players against JT staying on as the coach - sack them!"
Both ways ?????????????????? Lay off the grog Mate!
Actually Russell its quite confusing what point you are trying to make.
On one hand you state we cant sack Taylor because he has a contract that has another 2 years to go, also you have mentioned on a few occasions that we have no money to pay out that contract.
Now you offer that we sack all the players that don't support JT.
Say 5 players didn't support JT. How on earth can we afford to pay out 5 players contracts if we cant afford to pay out JTs?
Also why do we honour JTs contract but not the players?
It sounds like you are contradicting yourself.
Take your point boys - obviously not explained very well.
We can't pay everyone out - granted.
The point I was trying to make was that if they don't want to play for the present coach - get rid of them. Maybe NSW cup then.
You can't have players dictating to the club as to who the coach is.
We have been there twice recently.
I don't think any of the players are against JT in the first place.
Apologies for the confusion Newtown - maybe I was on the grog and didn't know it.