Ultimately Melbourne have a more classy roster and that makes a difference in an arm-wrestle. Yes lots of Tigers players could have done 1%ers better, but also we did a lot of stuff right to put ourselves in the position to win.
Thing for Tigers is, when the match comes down to the wire, we don't have any real game-breakers. Will Chambers frankly is a game breaker and he'd be first picked every week if he was a Tiger. But also Munster, Smith, NAS, Jesse Bromwich, JAC, Vunivalu - all major threats that compete for 80 minutes.
Madge said Tigers competed well for 75 mins but frankly we made a sprinkle of mistakes all througout the game - didn't quite take all our chances, didn't quite complete everything we set out to do. Melbourne are a good side and although we forced a few errors in tackles, they are very good at defending their line. And despite Tigers not being an attacking powerhouse, we score more points than any other side has managed this year vs Melbourne (esp in Melbourne), so the gameplan was working.
I can live with the result, so long as Tigers continue to play at this level all year. That's a benchmark I want to see hit, and I can cop losses if the performance is commendable.