WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS

Status
Not open for further replies.
@mike said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1438165) said:
@milky said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1438144) said:
The Fed government wants NSW to have stricter lockdowns even if the majority is vaccinated. This really contradicts their ‘road map’.

Regardless of how many COVID cases, we cannot continue to fight nature and keep locking down our country.

Sure, hospitalisations will go up. Maybe instead of boosting funding in unnecessary areas we should build extra hospitals and provide free tuition to those aspiring to study in the medical field. Counter the pandemic in a manner that does not compromise the mental health of our citizens and without driving our economy to the ground.

We are subject to strict conditions. Yes, there is a lawful basis for it but we have been living with the virus for a significant period of time. Our health experts and ministers ought to have had sufficient time to advance our health system to the extent where it is able to cope with increasing numbers of COVID.

The virus disappeared for a while and all our politicians sat on their hands and applauded themselves instead of opening their eyes to the serious risk of a second wave. Why didn’t we acquire larger numbers of vaccines? Why didn’t we build more hospitals?

Quarantine stations, we still don’t have them.

Clearly this should have happened but I think this is just fighting the battle better but the war is going to be won via the virus.
 
@earl said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1438174) said:
@mike said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1438165) said:
@milky said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1438144) said:
The Fed government wants NSW to have stricter lockdowns even if the majority is vaccinated. This really contradicts their ‘road map’.

Regardless of how many COVID cases, we cannot continue to fight nature and keep locking down our country.

Sure, hospitalisations will go up. Maybe instead of boosting funding in unnecessary areas we should build extra hospitals and provide free tuition to those aspiring to study in the medical field. Counter the pandemic in a manner that does not compromise the mental health of our citizens and without driving our economy to the ground.

We are subject to strict conditions. Yes, there is a lawful basis for it but we have been living with the virus for a significant period of time. Our health experts and ministers ought to have had sufficient time to advance our health system to the extent where it is able to cope with increasing numbers of COVID.

The virus disappeared for a while and all our politicians sat on their hands and applauded themselves instead of opening their eyes to the serious risk of a second wave. Why didn’t we acquire larger numbers of vaccines? Why didn’t we build more hospitals?

Quarantine stations, we still don’t have them.

Clearly this should have happened but I think this is just fighting the battle better but the war is going to be won via the virus.

Nah, the war will be won by us with vaccinations.
 
@mike said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1438165) said:
Quarantine stations, we still don’t have them.

I said to my wife last year the Government should have been using cruise ships for quarantine. Cruises were shut down so the ships would have been available and I'm sure could have been negotiated at a reasonable cost.

Park them offshore, separate people onto various decks and test them every couple of days. You test positive you go to an isolation deck or get shipped to hospital. After two weeks you get to come home. Just like hotel quarantine but offshore.
 
@voice_of_reason said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1438183) said:
@mike said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1438165) said:
Quarantine stations, we still don’t have them.

I said to my wife last year the Government should have been using cruise ships for quarantine. Cruises were shut down so the ships would have been available and I'm sure could have been negotiated at a reasonable cost.

Park them offshore, separate people onto various decks and test them every couple of days. You test positive you go to an isolation deck or get shipped to hospital. After two weeks you get to come home.

I think that would have been the worse place for quarantine.
 
@mike said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1437637) said:
@colinbh said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1437614) said:
@851 said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1437106) said:
@mike said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1436526) said:
@tiger-beach said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1436518) said:
@mike said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1436475) said:
I see some people are struggling with the maths, so here we go. Let's do the US, simply because I haven't done them for a while.

US Population is 333,143,413 so a bit more than 333 million.
US Deaths due to Covid19 is 631,299 so over 631 thousand.

333,142,413 / 631,299 is 527.7 so lets say 528

So for every 528 people in the US a person has died of Covid19. 1 in 528.

I agree with your maths but the elderly deaths heavily impact the overall rate being a significant % of the deaths whilst a low % of the population

Assuming (I don’t know these rates, they are guesstimates) they are 80% of the deaths but 20% of the population it comes down to around 1 death in 2,100 excluding the elderly

Elderly rate would be high but so would their rate of death in general

I’m not disagreeing with you, just trying to illustrate it moves around a lot by segment

Australia in total is around 1 death in 25,000 in total and would come down to 1 in 100,000 using the same theoretical exclusion of the elderly

It's only 1 in 25,000 in Australia because we are an Island and we have built a wall to keep the world and the virus out. That wall has been breached by the Delta strain and we can no longer rely on the wall. If the virus gets hold here we will have similar number to the US unless we vaccinate.

In regards to the elderly, while this may have been the case early on, the majority of the elderly have now been vaccinated and the virus profile has shifted to those that remain unvaccinated. ie the lower age groups.

Regardless of how you slice and dice it, that does not change the over all numbers and the fact remains that so far in the US 1 in 528 people have died of Covid19 during the Pandemic. That is what we are looking at here if the Delta strain takes hold and we remain unvaccinated.

Mike your facts in this post and previous posts are indisputable, and also quite alarming, the mind boggles as to how some can write them off Donald Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon style.
I suppose the herd mentality will sort them out

Would that be the Donald Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon that ordered the vaccines in the first place?

And would the vaccines of which you speak be the ones that the looney left said where no good because Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon initiated them?

From the WHO "99% of world wide cases are mild"

But feel free to waffle on. After all we still have free speech in this country don^t we?

So are you happy that 1 in 528 people in the US have died of Covid19?

And I waffle, go figure Mike
 
@cochise said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1438184) said:
I think that would have been the worse place for quarantine.

Not if done strategically. Alternate rooms (none side by side), staff isolated and tested. Food prep only on you level. I'm certainly NOT suggesting people stroll around on deck and hit the gaming rooms - they'd be isolated in their rooms as per hotel quarantine.

We have to remember Australia was basically COVID free earlier in the year. Hotel quarantine breaches are responsible for all our current cases - if they were offshore we'd have been protected by the Pacific moat.
 
@jadtiger said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1437639) said:
@colinbh said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1437614) said:
And would the vaccines of which you speak be the ones that the looney left said where no good because Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon initiated them?

Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon did NOT initiate vaccine production and the left of politics has not criticised vaccine production,it is the right wing morons who have and are still doing that.
As usual you have zero idea

Yes he did. Yes they did. No they did*t,

You must still be watching CNN.
 
A lesson for everyone, if you can't be bothered reading it all, just the last paragraph will do.

DON'T ARGUE WITH DONKEYS (Fable)
The donkey said to the tiger:
- "The grass is blue".
The tiger replied:
- "No, the grass is green."
The discussion heated up, and the two decided to submit him to arbitration, and for this they went before the lion, the King of the Jungle.
Already before reaching the forest clearing, where the lion was sitting on his throne, the donkey began to shout:
- "His Highness, is it true that the grass is blue?".
The lion replied:
- "True, the grass is blue."
The donkey hurried and continued:
- "The tiger disagrees with me and contradicts and annoys me, please punish him."
The king then declared:
- "The tiger will be punished with 5 years of silence."
The donkey jumped cheerfully and went on his way, content and repeating:
- "The Grass Is Blue"...
The tiger accepted his punishment, but before he asked the lion:
- "Your Majesty, why have you punished me?, after all, the grass is green."
The lion replied:
- "In fact, the grass is green."
The tiger asked:
- "So why are you punishing me?".
The lion replied:
- "That has nothing to do with the question of whether the grass is blue or green. The punishment is because it is not possible for a brave and intelligent creature like you to waste time arguing with a donkey, and on top of that come and bother me with that question."
The worst waste of time is arguing with the fool and fanatic who does not care about truth or reality, but only the victory of his beliefs and illusions. Never waste time on arguments that don't make sense... There are people who, no matter how much evidence and evidence we present to them, are not in the capacity to understand, and others are blinded by ego, hatred and resentment, and all they want is to be right even if they are not. When ignorance screams, intelligence is silent. Your peace and quiet are worth more.
 
@colinbh said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1439341) said:
@jadtiger said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1437639) said:
@colinbh said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1437614) said:
And would the vaccines of which you speak be the ones that the looney left said where no good because Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon initiated them?

Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon did NOT initiate vaccine production and the left of politics has not criticised vaccine production,it is the right wing morons who have and are still doing that.
As usual you have zero idea

Yes he did. Yes they did. No they did*t,

You must still be watching CNN.


I actually feel sorry for you.
 
@voice_of_reason said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1439491) said:
A lesson for everyone, if you can't be bothered reading it all, just the last paragraph will do.

DON'T ARGUE WITH DONKEYS (Fable)
The donkey said to the tiger:
- "The grass is blue".
The tiger replied:
- "No, the grass is green."
The discussion heated up, and the two decided to submit him to arbitration, and for this they went before the lion, the King of the Jungle.
Already before reaching the forest clearing, where the lion was sitting on his throne, the donkey began to shout:
- "His Highness, is it true that the grass is blue?".
The lion replied:
- "True, the grass is blue."
The donkey hurried and continued:
- "The tiger disagrees with me and contradicts and annoys me, please punish him."
The king then declared:
- "The tiger will be punished with 5 years of silence."
The donkey jumped cheerfully and went on his way, content and repeating:
- "The Grass Is Blue"...
The tiger accepted his punishment, but before he asked the lion:
- "Your Majesty, why have you punished me?, after all, the grass is green."
The lion replied:
- "In fact, the grass is green."
The tiger asked:
- "So why are you punishing me?".
The lion replied:
- "That has nothing to do with the question of whether the grass is blue or green. The punishment is because it is not possible for a brave and intelligent creature like you to waste time arguing with a donkey, and on top of that come and bother me with that question."
The worst waste of time is arguing with the fool and fanatic who does not care about truth or reality, but only the victory of his beliefs and illusions. Never waste time on arguments that don't make sense... There are people who, no matter how much evidence and evidence we present to them, are not in the capacity to understand, and others are blinded by ego, hatred and resentment, and all they want is to be right even if they are not. When ignorance screams, intelligence is silent. Your peace and quiet are worth more.

True. That’s why I tend to avoid these types of subs and social media in general.

This is the version of that little story that I like:

“Don’t blame a clown for acting like a clown. Ask yourself why you keep going to the circus.”

I no longer go to the circus, I don’t have the energy or the time to waste arguing with fools.
 
@colinbh said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1439341) said:
@jadtiger said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1437639) said:
@colinbh said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1437614) said:
And would the vaccines of which you speak be the ones that the looney left said where no good because Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon initiated them?

Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon did NOT initiate vaccine production and the left of politics has not criticised vaccine production,it is the right wing morons who have and are still doing that.
As usual you have zero idea

Yes he did. Yes they did. No they did*t,

You must still be watching CNN.

No he didn't Col. He put in a massive advance order with a pharmaceutical company pending approval.

Research started on vaccines the minute it was realised this virus was out of hand. By your logic if I put in an advance order of 2000 2022 Camaro's, I've initated development of the 2022 Camaro lmao...
 
@colinbh said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1439341) said:
@jadtiger said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1437639) said:
@colinbh said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1437614) said:
And would the vaccines of which you speak be the ones that the looney left said where no good because Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon initiated them?

Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon did NOT initiate vaccine production and the left of politics has not criticised vaccine production,it is the right wing morons who have and are still doing that.
As usual you have zero idea

Yes he did. Yes they did. No they did*t,

You must still be watching CNN.

What a day this is. Col discussing Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon again. You banging on for 4 years about how Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon would be re-elected didn’t quite work out did it ??
 
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435059) said:
Will not be getting the experimental jab. As Harvey alluded to, it does not work the way a normal safe vaccine works. A vaccine normally offers 2 things:
1. Immunity
2. Stop transmission

This jab does neither.

There is alao NO data on long term effects of the jab. Some experts are saying it may cause auto immune disorders, alzheimers in the elderly and blood clots leading to death (this we already know).

Unfortunately alot of this information (while available), is being heavily censored.

Im one third through 36 of these pages and your post so far is the most ridiculous. You have no idea.
 
@honkylips said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1439828) said:
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435059) said:
Will not be getting the experimental jab. As Harvey alluded to, it does not work the way a normal safe vaccine works. A vaccine normally offers 2 things:
1. Immunity
2. Stop transmission

This jab does neither.

There is alao NO data on long term effects of the jab. Some experts are saying it may cause auto immune disorders, alzheimers in the elderly and blood clots leading to death (this we already know).

Unfortunately alot of this information (while available), is being heavily censored.

Im halfway through 35 of these pages and your post so far is the most ridiculous. You have no idea.

Yes, it is incorrect. They do reduce infection and transmission in people, it's just not wholesale. Hoxton Park party early in the outbreak had 30 guests, six were vaccinated. Guess which six party attendees didn't even contract the virus despite being in proximity to someone with it?
 
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1436121) said:
You can’t have differing views to the pro vaccination brigade mate. They’re correct and everyone else is wrong.

Finally you speak sense. It took 26 pages to get there....
 
@blacknwhite said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1437767) said:
I would vaccinate no matter what if I could somehow get a pfizer jab.

I have never been allergic to anything in my life until, 12 months ago... all of a sudden broke out in hives for 14 weeks out of nowhere, my immune response went in to hyperdrive. Needles arent a good option for me, but damn, if they could get the pfizer here I would still do it.

Speak with your GP. Astra Zeneca will probably be an option. It's safe. Don't listen to the scare-mongering.
 
i feel sorry for the rwnj's who live life under a permanent tin foil hat.

A constant state of paranoia must be draining.

Watching Sky news or Fox news and believing a single word of what's said, or believing anything the likes of Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon and Scomo say. It's harmful to ones health to follow the instructions of morons.
 
Guys, If you are confused or are on the fence surrounding the vaccine go and see your GP. Voice your concerns about it. Then make a decision.
 
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1436335) said:
@851 said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1436191) said:
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1436121) said:
Everyone lives happily ever after and does what is right for them

But they don't, they die

Mate the chances of dying from a virus that has a 98% suvival rate is slim

Just so you are aware a 2% chance of dying from something is actually quite high. I don't know if you understand mortality risks.

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-basics/lifetime-probability-of-developing-or-dying-from-cancer.html
For example in the United States, your average lifetime risk of dying from colorectal cancer is 1.83%. You risk of dying from lung cancer is 5.49%, and of prostate cancer 2.44%.

If COVID was a cancer, it would be in the top 3 killers of Americans in the cancer group.

Primary difference is these are lifetime cancer risks and you can't catch cancer from someone else. If you contract COVID, that 2% mortality is real and immediate - you have a 2% chance of death within the next 1-2 months.
 
@balmain-boy said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1439863) said:
Watching Sky news or Fox news and believing a single word of what’s said, or believing anything the likes of Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon
[/QUOTE]

@jirskyr made a post about Trumpism. I think there are a couple of big take outs from this pandemic said:
1. Mainstream science is correct the vast majority of the time. If you stick to the mainstream view you will be correct 99.9% of the time. It's not you either. It's the way science requires proof to verify facts. Science is reality. No single persons opinion matters.
2. There is so much disinformation and tribalism out there. There is money and power in pandering to fools who want to be smart or different or whatever rather than face reality. Disinformation and tribalism are the tools that people like Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon, Fox News, Sky News etc use on these people. I don't think these people/groups are stupid. They just want money and power.
3. Science and technology are amazing. The vaccines that have been produced are a medical miracle.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Back
Top