cochise
Well-known member
That is my assumption.Wasn’t aware he was a temporary solution. In that case you would think they may have someone in mind who is currently committed?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is my assumption.Wasn’t aware he was a temporary solution. In that case you would think they may have someone in mind who is currently committed?
I’m just catching up. That sounds positive, on a few levels. Forward planning. No leaks on it. New guy possibly demonstrating success in the job. This could be the change we’ve been waiting for?That is my assumption.
No leaks? It’s between Mark O’Neil and the rugby guy who appears to have knocked us back. 😂I’m just catching up. That sounds positive, on a few levels. Forward planning. No leaks on it. New guy possibly demonstrating success in the job. This could be the change we’ve been waiting for?
You sayin’ O’Neil is doing a Bradbury?😂No leaks? It’s between Mark O’Neil and the rugby guy who appears to have knocked us back. 😂
Fair enough but we saw a pattern in the past and a pattern now:I understand where you are coming from.
But a 3-3 split is necessary in my opinion and especially on this board as we would need at least 1 board member from either Club rep or independents list to add their vote to make up a majority count.
This is my thinking to ensure unity where you have a board wanting to work together and not having any one party with more power or control then the other.
However this is WTs I guess so a 3-3 split board is likely to operate in the opposite fashion and nothing would get done without the other side agreeing to anything.
I thought Holman Barnes and Wests Ashfield are one and the same so no I wouldn’t give 2 seats to the same entity.
We interviewed at an Ambush event earlier in the year and I found him to be very impressive. It was recorded and released as a podcast episode.
This is only an Interim position, so I don't have an issue with the appointment but what I'm interested in is who he is keeping the seat warm for.
That's what I was thinking....Why would we bother announcing an interim head of football if he's only warming the seat?
I'm confused.
I'm hoping that it is because there is a high calibre replacement, who is currently employed somewhere else, coming in 12 months time. Key word is hoping as the history of this club doesn't fill me with confidence.Why would we bother announcing an interim head of football if he's only warming the seat?
I'm confused.
Wayne BennettWe interviewed at an Ambush event earlier in the year and I found him to be very impressive. It was recorded and released as a podcast episode.
This is only an Interim position, so I don't have an issue with the appointment but what I'm interested in is who he is keeping the seat warm for.
You and me bothI'm hoping that it is because there is a high calibre replacement, who is currently employed somewhere else, coming in 12 months time. Key word is hoping as the history of this club doesn't fill me with confidence.
Exactly what I’ve been thinking 🤞🏼Wayne Bennett
I'm hoping that it is because there is a high calibre replacement, who is currently employed somewhere else, coming in 12 months time.
Pretty much all the appointments the club has made have been high calibre ones, seemingly best available at the time.Key word is hoping as the history of this club doesn't fill me with confidence.
Except we fail to get our priority target over the line time and again.Pretty much all the appointments the club has made have been high calibre ones, seemingly best available at the time.
Coaches were given 3 years to make the 8.....Pretty standard stuff in an 8/16 format.
Cleary was outside of our control.
Sheens was always interim.
In fact Benji is the only non high calibre coach appointed........rushed on because senior players regarded him.
Who was our priority target during the last 10 years that we didn't get?Except we fail to get our priority target over the line time and again.
Then when we do get a plan in place, often 2nd or 3rd choice, we have the attention span of a goldfish when it comes to implementing that plan.
Bennett, Ciraldo, Mitchell, Munster, Moses all within the last 5 years that were high profile, public, priority targets that we missed. They are just the publicly known ones. Imagine the misses we didn't publiciseWho was our priority target during the last 10 years that we didn't get?
For me all our recent problems stem from a certain players mannager and the so called big 4 and when the club took the best recourse to rebuild by signing Cleary he threw us under the bus outside the club’s control.
Munster and Moses didn't move. Doesn't count.Bennett, Ciraldo, Mitchell, Munster, Moses all within the last 5 years that were high profile, public, priority targets that we missed. They are just the publicly known ones. Imagine the misses we didn't publicise
OkMunster and Moses didn't move. Doesn't count.
Ciraldo is hopeless.
Couldn't have seen Bennett coaching here.
Mitchell was always going to Souths....they have a head start with Aboriginal players.
Strikes me as somewhat odd that they appoint him as the interim now when the position has basically been vacant since Sheens took over the head coaching gig.We interviewed at an Ambush event earlier in the year and I found him to be very impressive. It was recorded and released as a podcast episode.
This is only an Interim position, so I don't have an issue with the appointment but what I'm interested in is who he is keeping the seat warm for.
Me too, that's what makes me think they may have someone lined up to take it on in 12 months.Strikes me as somewhat odd that they appoint him as the interim now when the position has basically been vacant since Sheens took over the head coaching gig.
Munster and Moses didn't move. Doesn't count.
Ciraldo is hopeless.
Couldn't have seen Bennett coaching here.
Mitchell was always going to Souths....they have a head start with Aboriginal players.