Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

Lee's fedora said:
They offload Thompsons deal and we are paying some of Brook's deal there so instead of them having all of his they will only have 300k of Brook's deal is what I'm hearing
Click to expand...
There have been reports Brooks is on 900k to a million next year.

That would mean we are paying around $600k for Brooks to play for Dogs plus $800k for Luke Thompson. - not sure even we could screw the cap that bad
 
sly said:
Forget about dillon for first grade at this club for a couple of reasons, he needs time, I’m not saying he will ever be as good as papenhuyzen, but I watched papenhuyzen and he couldn’t handle reserve grade when first played it, he was timid and rag dolled and mr Mac and others didn’t see it in papenhuyzen, so they let him go. We didn’t want him. Unfortunately we don’t have time for a dillon to sit in reserve grade, make mistakes be inconsistent, get stronger, gain confidence etc…. We have nobody in reserve grade to help the youngsters progress, and it doesn’t matter how dillon plays, macdonell doesn’t like him.
Click to expand...
Why would McDonnell have a say in team selection for first grade? I'd say he'd have zero input into that.
 
InBenjiWeTrust said:
And I repeat, of the players we have ATM he is our best FB by miles!
Click to expand...

In top form I think he is our best fullback but he is miles off that level at that moment. Would Doueihi have missed that bomb ? How many players don't score off the Brooks kick if they are where Laurie was ?

He needs to go this week and get his form back in reserves.

I'm fine if he gets picked this week and then comes out and he plays to his ability but I wouldn't take that risk if I was selecting the team.
 
sleeve said:
Gee, i think i have watched nearly every Tigers game in recent years and i like AD. But seriously he would not make 5/8 in any other side in the comp. You are dreaming if you think he would improve this side playing in the halves! He will be lucky to make the top 13! Piease name a slower 1/2 or 5/8 in the comp. We need speed and someone elusive in these positions.
Click to expand...
This is the great trope of Rugby League; that a certain position needs to be a certain type of player.

A five-eighth doesn't need to be quick and elusive, he could be big and strong, or slippery, or an organiser, or a run-first player, or a skilful backrower-type, or whatever...

Provided a team plays to their strengths, with a game plan to suit, any number of body types or skillsets can work in just about any position.

Cam Murray works as a 13. NAS works as a 13.
Cam Smith worked as a 9. Robbie worked as a 9. Damien Cook works as a 9.

All these players are built different and play different.

AD can be a great five-eighth in my opinion and is best suited there. But equally, he could be a great centre. It depends on the strengths and needs of the team and how he's used.
 
LUPO said:
The players never own their losses. I'm afraid the only way to attract top quality players and turn over the current playing roster is to find a coach that players want to play under-I don't see Madge as that coach with all the bad wraps he gets in the media. Might be time for a Ciraldo, Flanagan or Kristian Woolf purely on the basis of attracting players to the club.

I think our club looks stale to players looking for a new club - a new approach is needed. It's also time for Mr Triguboff to take an active role in the recruitment drive - not in identifying players but what he can offer to players after football/investments etc being truly invested in the club wanting it to succeed on and off the field like Politis at the Roosters or Russell at the Bunnies (love them or hate them). Many clubs would die to have our Junior nursery and supporter base - c'mon Tigers let's make it happen.
Click to expand...

We do need to attract players & last few months we have done that somewhat - The issue is bigger than Madge over the last 2-3yrs and has been more off field than on it.

Sheens has come in and we are spending money all of a sudden.

I do think we went after the wrong type of big name players that would've been same old same old which put us back a long way had they joined. Mitchell & JAC wouldn't have brought any big names with them & I just don't see without a bunch of support how they would've been effective here (JAC has been ordinary at the Bulldogs this year).

Knowing Madge will be coach in the off season we signed arguably the best backrower & hooker in the comp (Papa & Api) & extended one of the best young props in Stefano.

Yes the last 3-4yrs have been absolutely shocking but in the recruitment stakes pending major injuries we are recruiting the right players in the right positions for a change.

We also have invested alot in the Flegg age pool (so 2-3yr benefit) which ties into Sheens plans to compete in the next 3yrs. I don't think Ceraldo, Woolf or Flannagan could've attracted bigger names than Papa, Api and Stefano for us in the last 3mths ready for next year.
 
Kelce68 said:
This is the great trope of Rugby League; that a certain position needs to be a certain type of player.

A five-eighth doesn't need to be quick and elusive, he could be big and strong, or slippery, or an organiser, or a run-first player, or a skilful backrower-type, or whatever...

Provided a team plays to their strengths, with a game plan to suit, any number of body types or skillsets can work in just about any position.

Cam Murray works as a 13. NAS works as a 13.
Cam Smith worked as a 9. Robbie worked as a 9. Damien Cook works as a 9.

All these players are built different and play different.

AD can be a great five-eighth in my opinion and is best suited there. But equally, he could be a great centre. It depends on the strengths and needs of the team and how he's used.
Click to expand...

It also comes down to him actually getting a fair run in a position and not moved around.
He clearly has talent, passion and takes accountability.
 
Dare I write it but another issue surely a club like ours must look at is durability. How many games is a player actually on the field per season? If you are on a good contract of say $500k and above, all intents an purposes you should be out there as much as possible.
 
Tiger4life43 said:
Brooks won 4 years ago, while Doueihi finished 8th last year. Important to remember context when evaluating current form.
Click to expand...

How about this for context... Nofa won winger of the year in 2020. 2021 (last year) would've come near the bottom, this year will struggle to figure a point on current form - he hasn't been injured during that time.

AD is a quality player for us but got points playing various positions across the park, he missed pre-season and is out for half this year. AD won't figure in the Dally M voting standings this year so his result last year will now mean squat.

Point is I wouldn't be using Dally M to justify an argument for a Wests Tigers player as history often says they decline very quickly after getting a good rating.
 
pawsandclaws1 said:
Dare I write it but another issue surely a club like ours must look at is durability. How many games is a player actually on the field per season? If you are on a good contract of say $500k and above, all intents an purposes you should be out there as much as possible.
Click to expand...
Yep it should be a big consideration. Not much you can do to predict how a player will fare with injury after they've signed though. Luck of the draw most times, but yep, stay away from signing blokes who have an injury history.
 
pawsandclaws1 said:
Dare I write it but another issue surely a club like ours must look at is durability. How many games is a player actually on the field per season? If you are on a good contract of say $500k and above, all intents an purposes you should be out there as much as possible.
Click to expand...
Fair call, but hard to plan for. Look at the 2021 Roosters.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 521 (members: 24, guests: 497)
Back
Top