jirskyr
Well-known member
I don't know if that is true. I would identify Leichhardt Oval with Wests Tigers just as strongly as I'd identify Redfern with Souths, and Souths don't even play there any more, and their new Centre of Excellence is at Matraville (I was just there the other day).@harvey said in [Premier backs renewal of suburban NRL grounds](/post/1525902) said:Like it or not there is still a degree of tribalism in rugby league. The tigers do not have an identity, there is no geographical area that can identify with them as their team. Is there another NRL club that this can be said about?
Same for Dragons, which personally I'd identify with Jubilee and I still don't think they've earned the Wollongong crowd, even though many of their best juniors come from Illawarra.
Bulldogs are all about Belmore but they never play there either.
I would actually be most interested to hear what 20 year olds think about the old tribalism. Because I grew up in the 80s with the same tribalism that my Dad experienced in the 1950s (plus a few extra teams), but the distribution of home grounds and fans has changed a lot since 1997.
Also to your other questions: yes to all of them, I am certain the NRL is very interested in all demographics particularly female and youth supporters. I know for a fact WT are big on increasing female and youth engagement through membership and game-day experience. Maybe even a special Redhead Research Unit, we can call @cochise back in for that.