Agree, it’s the first time they played in this format, give it time to develop. It was clunky but that’s really not unexpected. The main problem yesterday was and has always been brooks 5th tackle kicking. The commentators where talking about it endlessly. Not one player went up for any of his kicks, no pressure applied, not sure if it’s his kicks are too deep or the players are unaware of what he’s doing??Have to disagree & agree with a lot that has been said. As stated in the first post, we have 2 5/8s running. I have seen in the past where a talented ballplaying lock has played like a 5/8 (eg Jim Dymock) but i cant remember a lock playing like a halfback. I think that is thinking outside the box & worth persisting with. Hastings was still doing what he does best(organising) and played pretty much a 7 role with a few hitups. I take the point we lose a "fulltime" forward in this arrangement, however I think when the bugs are ironed out we will find the extra attack will more than make up for this. Have both wingers & even one centre take an extra ruck up when we are pushing out of our end, but start play a bit of footy outside our 40. Also , while I agree Douhie needs to pass the ball more, we have to remember he has only just come back from injury.
I agree our go forward has been missing all year, so it is very easy to blame Brooks & Hastings . But seriously are they supposed to have to ruck it up as well as make the plays? With this new arrangement, I believe it will encourage us to play a bit of footy, just like the old days when The Tigs were well known for it.
I think Hastings at lock is worth persisting with, why not?
I have watched brooks through the under twenties to first grade. He’s no organising halfback never will be, not smart enough. But, he was a much better kicker in the 20’s kicked fourth/twenties regularly and could stop the ball in the ingoal with back doin on a dime. He just lacks the confidence, hopefully bunji can bring that back for him. Would help if we had a decent pack though!!