Jackson Hastings #251

Probably didn't help Douehi wasn't available for the 1st 3 months ...but our spine was 16th/16 ....and before someone says Newcastle I'd take Ponga and Brailey with Happy and Hobbo in the 6 and 7 over our spine ...well maybe not Hobbo ...happy and Ink perhaps lol ..but you get my drift

Well, at least you you take up a good bit of space in the defensive line nowadays, so they would get tired running around you.
 
Only problem with Murray is that he is possibly only a head knock or two away from giving the game away and maybe Jacko doesn't want to go down that road.

I agree that we looked the best when Jackson played at 13 but we need his organisational ability on the field for 80 minutes which is a pretty big ask playing in the middle.

Agreed Murray is the terminator
 
No. In an interview. He clearly stated "I'm the 6".

I haven't heard it directly out of Hastings mouth but I'm pretty confident he wants to play 7 rather than 13 and I don't blame him. I'm not sure if his body will hold up over the course of a season at lock.

Just so you don't think I'm a Brooks fanboy my personal opinion is that it's better if Brooks leaves and we try Hastings at 7 and AD at 6.
Earl, are you serious ? That's your pick for the halves to take us forward ! Do you promote suicide for the fans ?
 
You know things are bad when people use the argument that Hastings was halfback for 3 of our 4 wins as justification for keeping a player & how crucial said player is to the team and our future despite coming clear last and finishing biggest margin outside the top 8 for over a decade.

If we are benchmarking a player on getting us 3 wins out of 4 wins for a full season they are replaceable.
Except you are forgetting he didn’t play a full season.
Played 13 games… a lot of them while carrying an injury and the first 5 with Brooks as half.
 
Except you are forgetting he didn’t play a full season.
Played 13 games… a lot of them while carrying an injury and the first 5 with Brooks as half.

I'm not forgetting anything.
Hastings played 66% of the season, 16 games, 1 less game than Brooks.
2 games Hastings played with Brooks was named halfback. Storm & Knights.
Against the Knights Hastings touched the ball more than Brooks 60 to 46 receipts.

The Storm game is the only game Hastings touched the ball less than Brooks when they played together in his 16 games including the Broncos game where he got injured.

If we look at possessions effectiveness from an attacking lens it's very clear how the effectiveness difference between Hastings and Brooks. Hastings was actually the least effective creating half in the comp in 22.

Hastings 1210, 4 line break assists (0.003%), 7 Try Assists (0.006%) - notice the extra 0 in the %
Brooks 856, 12 LBA (0.014%) , 11 TA (0.013%)
 
I'm not forgetting anything.
Hastings played 66% of the season, 16 games, 1 less game than Brooks.
2 games Hastings played with Brooks was named halfback. Storm & Knights.
Against the Knights Hastings touched the ball more than Brooks 60 to 46 receipts.

The Storm game is the only game Hastings touched the ball less than Brooks when they played together in his 16 games including the Broncos game where he got injured.

If we look at possessions effectiveness from an attacking lens it's very clear how the effectiveness difference between Hastings and Brooks. Hastings was actually the least effective creating half in the comp in 22.

Hastings 1210, 4 line break assists (0.003%), 7 Try Assists (0.006%) - notice the extra 0 in the %
Brooks 856, 12 LBA (0.014%) , 11 TA (0.013%)
Very astute analysis MT.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top