Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

[Tom Brbyb]

this is what you posted ::

"Karl Oloapu has already agreed to a deal with Dolphins, Bulldogs talk is hot air."

I fail to see how it is poorly phrased and how anyone would misconstrue what you said.

Simple error, was typing quickly and got the order of the two clubs back to front, but I think the meaning from my post is clear nonetheless if one is not trying to nitpick.

 

[Jedi_Tiger]

This will probably be an unpopular opinion but if one of Moses demands is to be partnered with Brooks that sets a bad precedent early, Sheens & Benjis should be the ones picking the team & deciding who should be in the halves.

understand Moses manager last year asked the Tigers to strengthen pack which we did with Klemmer and Bateman. Also noting Klemmer, Bateman both Issac Moses clients and picked the Tigers.

I think a player coming to the club in the halves is allowed to ask who the club is thinking will be his halves partner e.g. AD LB or another player. If said player is not happy e.g. Sheens picks LB and Moses wants AD then Moses would be entitled to say to Sheens thanks but no thanks. Likewise if Moses wants LB and Sheens picks AD and Moses is not happy then again he is entitled not to sign for the club.

In the case of his other option at Parramatta Moses knows who his halves partner will be so no issue there.

 

[Tito Santana]

If Moses comes, AD will wisely looking for another club i imagine,he's been tried in these positions. Laurie has been offered an extension, and leads the way at fullback, Then Stains, then Bula, who are fast and can play on the edges, plus a stack of cheap young kids coming through .
This could even be another Hastings like scenario.

Yep AD is gone. Wants ridiculous money and wants to play 5/8. His best spot is centre but he’s not interested.

Off to Super League you go,

Me though, I’d be sudsing out Kurtley Beale. Grub - there is no doubt but reckon he’d go well. Plus he’s been stood down.

 

[pawsandclaws1]

This will probably be an unpopular opinion but if one of Moses demands is to be partnered with Brooks that sets a bad precedent early, Sheens & Benjis should be the ones picking the team & deciding who should be in the halves.

What do you think that Moses' knows that you don't?

It could be that he knows Brooks can play but needs the forwards strengthened as per Moses' request?

Also any first grade half would want to know who he is going to be paired with.

In the article on the Brooks' thread, Marshall confirmed he wants Brooks to stay. Brooks also confirmed he wants to stay after discussions with Marshall.

Doueihi has left his options open.

 

[WesternSuburbsBoy]

understand Moses manager last year asked the Tigers to strengthen pack which we did with Klemmer and Bateman. Also noting Klemmer, Bateman both Issac Moses clients and picked the Tigers.

I think a player coming to the club in the halves is allowed to ask who the club is thinking will be his halves partner e.g. AD LB or another player. If said player is not happy e.g. Sheens picks LB and Moses wants AD then Moses would be entitled to say to Sheens thanks but no thanks. Likewise if Moses wants LB and Sheens picks AD and Moses is not happy then again he is entitled not to sign for the club.

In the case of his other option at Parramatta Moses knows who his halves partner will be so no issue there.

My point is the best player should get the chance to play alongside Moses not whoever Moses picks.

 

[TillLindemann]

understand Moses manager last year asked the Tigers to strengthen pack which we did with Klemmer and Bateman.

You would hope that we are trying to strengthen our pack because we want to, not because Moses' manager wants us to.

 

[Jedi_Tiger]

Yep AD is gone. Wants ridiculous money and wants to play 5/8. His best spot is centre but he’s not interested.

Off to Super League you go,

Me though, I’d be sudsing out Kurtley Beale. Grub - there is no doubt but reckon he’d go well. Plus he’s been stood down.

AD would go well back in rugby, he runs well kicks well and defence doesn't matter as much in rah rah. He was a good rugby player and would make the wallabies. He would be the type of steal Eddie Jones would go looking for and he could probably command 800k and above.

 

[pawsandclaws1]

My point is the best player should get the chance to play alongside Moses not whoever Moses picks.

You don't believe a 4 time premiership winning coach and one of the greatest 5/8s of all time would not be able to resolve this matter?

 

[pawsandclaws1]

This has nothing to do with my thoughts on Brooks/AD, I just think that Sheens should pick the best available player regardless of what Moses thinks.

See my reply below.

 

[Jedi_Tiger]

You would hope that we are trying to strengthen our pack because we want to, not because Moses' manager wants us to.

I worded that slightly wrong, it was along the lines of strengthen the pack and the quality backs will become available. Sheens obviously did that and it worked two fold as Moses had more than capable players in his stable klemmer and Bateman so for Isaac it was a win win really

 

[pawsandclaws1]

Did I say that? the point i'm trying to make is they are the ones who should decide who plays alongside Moses not Moses himself.

Perhaps they already have. You're a very reasonable poster but go and read Doueihi's comments again. It may be just my slant but he seems halfway out the door,

 

[WesternSuburbsBoy]

Perhaps they already have. You're a very reasonable poster but go and read Doueihi's comments again. It may be just my slant but he seems halfway out the door,

All this talk about who pairs Moses watch him not even come this smells like Latrell all over again hahaha

 

[WesternSuburbsBoy]

Perhaps they already have. You're a very reasonable poster but go and read Doueihi's comments again. It may be just my slant but he seems halfway out the door,

Also in regards to this if this is the case it's a poor decision from the club imo again nothing to do with my thoughts on Brooks/AD but both should be afforded the same opportunity to prove themselves to play alongside Moses next year.

 

[Tigerdave]

Glad Moses contract is for 4 years and not 5, but still pretty meh about the idea.

Decent enough player, still appears to be a down hill skier and I can't get the images of him tanking in his last couple of games for us.

We'll see if he does come here and can change my opinion.

 

[earl]

My point is the best player should get the chance to play alongside Moses not whoever Moses picks.

I don't believe that Moses will have any say in it. The best player should get the job. Money comes into it from a salary cap perspective but that is about it.

 

[pawsandclaws1]

Also in regards to this if this is the case it's a poor decision from the club imo again nothing to do with my thoughts on Brooks/AD but both should be afforded the same opportunity to prove themselves to play alongside Moses next year.

We're just supporters. I understand where you are coming from.

 

[Tom Brbyb]

Glad Moses contract is for 4 years and not 5, but still pretty meh about the idea.

Decent enough player, still appears to be a down hill skier and I can't get the images of him tanking in his last couple of games for us.

We'll see if he does come here and can change my opinion.

His new Parramatta contract?

 

[cktiger]

AD would go well back in rugby, he runs well kicks well and defence doesn't matter as much in rah rah. He was a good rugby player and would make the wallabies. He would be the type of steal Eddie Jones would go looking for and he could probably command 800k and above.

Lol Jedi ... anything to make it easier for Brooks to keep his job.

 

[851]

Agree, but why have a face to face & written contract in play this late.

Sounds promising, thanks mate for your info, we do appreciate it

 

[sleeve]

Far out man…
- the post I replied to was calling api the best pound for pound defender in the game?

I can’t contextualise your post to my comment…

Yeah, it was badly phrased, as i extended tackling technique into another argument, i apologise.