Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

Jedi_Tiger said:
AD on a one year delay makes no sense if he was the answer at 6 to partner Moses.
The dealay is Isaac trying to push Brooks deal, he gets commission on both and at present he has the leverage on the club he can easily be putting pressure on a Brooks deal. All that leverage goes away if Moses signs with parramatta.
Click to expand...
well if we are being held ransom by a crook like Isaac then the club hasn’t really learnt from its mistakes has it
 
Jedi_Tiger said:
wait Paws if Moses arrives at Concord (think he will) Brooks will probably be on a restructured 4 year deal.
If Moses doesn't sign then simple the club go back to Brooks and Isaac and are like that 4 year deal is now 3 years or go find another club. He wont leave sydney which does limit options a bit.
Click to expand...
If Moses signs maybe Brooks will then sign his new deal on lower terms. If Moses doesn't sign i can't see us re-signing Brooks yet. He'd have a few months to prove what he can do as the main man to see if he warrants a new deal
 
WesternSuburbsBoy said:
well if we are being held ransom by a crook like Isaac then the club hasn’t really learnt from its mistakes has it
Click to expand...
he did it once with tedecso Moses Brooks Woods.
If they had different manages it wouldn't even be a discussion the club could just be like shove that 4 year Brooks offer.
As it stands the offers are probably a fair bit closer between parramatta and tigers for Moses than they were a few weeks ago.
 
Jedi_Tiger said:
he did it once with tedecso Moses Brooks Woods.
If they had different manages it wouldn't even be a discussion the club could just be like shove that 4 year Brooks offer.
As it stands the offers are probably a fair bit closer between parramatta and tigers for Moses than they were a few weeks ago.
Click to expand...
no offence mate but what the hell has Brooks done to warrant a 4 year contract extension? that’s bloody ludicrous if true & would be one of the worst deals i’ve ever seen
 
balmain boy said:
If Moses signs maybe Brooks will then sign his new deal on lower terms. If Moses doesn't sign i can't see us re-signing Brooks yet. He'd have a few months to prove what he can do as the main man to see if he warrants a new deal
Click to expand...
100% if Moses doesn't sign then the club is in no rush at all to sign Brooks and nor should they rush.
 
WesternSuburbsBoy said:
no offence mate but what the hell has Brooks done to warrant a 4 year contract extension? that’s bloody ludicrous if true & would be one of the worst deals i’ve ever seen
Click to expand...
all I heard was the length of deal being asked I have no idea on the contract dollars over the 4 years, all I heard was club wants 3 years and Brooks and Isaac 4 year deal
 
  • Like
Reactions: 851
Jedi_Tiger said:
AD on a one year deal makes no sense if he was the answer at 6 to partner Moses.
The dealay is Isaac trying to push Brooks deal, he gets commission on both and at present he has the leverage on the club he can easily be putting pressure on a Brooks deal. All that leverage goes away if Moses signs with parramatta.
Click to expand...

That's what you think is happening
bro, not a fact or the reality of the
matter as it stands. I see AD's new
deal as a means to prove himself
for a bigger contract (longer term).
He's backing himself to earn one
after his reco and a full pre-season.
That makes more sense to me than
hypothesizing about what Moses
and his agent are thinking, and how
Brooks fits in to the equation ...
That's just my perspective of course,
could be wrong but 2 me makes sense
 
Kaito said:
That's what you think is happening
bro, not a fact or the reality of the
matter as it stands. I see AD's new
deal as a means to prove himself
for a bigger contract (longer term).
He's backing himself to earn one
after his reco and a full pre-season.
That makes more sense to me than
hypothesizing about what Moses
and his agent are thinking, and how
Brooks fits in to the equation ...
That's just my perspective of course,
could be wrong but 2 me makes sense
Click to expand...
only going by what I am told and that is around Brooks and Moses, as far as AD goes and the one year deal have no info on that at all or the reasons
 
Jedi_Tiger said:
he did it once with tedecso Moses Brooks Woods.
If they had different manages it wouldn't even be a discussion the club could just be like shove that 4 year Brooks offer.
As it stands the offers are probably a fair bit closer between parramatta and tigers for Moses than they were a few weeks ago.
Click to expand...
So did he get a 5th year added by the eels , otherwise they can’t be closer then 1.5M apart
 
Jedi_Tiger said:
all I heard was the length of deal being asked I have no idea on the contract dollars over the 4 years, all I heard was club wants 3 years and Brooks and Isaac 4 year deal
Click to expand...
You know anything about Brooks involves emotive posts. What you heard is not unreasonable in itself and is revealing if you look at it logically - the sticking point is tenure of Brooks' contract, I am sure it will be resolved.
 
Tucker said:
It is disingenuous to state Sheens did not get us the spoon.
As the head honcho of the football department he sacked our entrenched coach, who had prepared the squad all off season, mid year. He then engaged in a highly publicised chase for Ciraldo which ended in tears, that I’m sure emboldened the entire squad to believe in the joint. This was further strengthened by his failure to find a suitable coach for the one he had sacked, so he took the job himself with a caveat that an uber extreme greenhorn would be prepared to take over from him in 2025. Whilst all of this was going on, he installed another greenhorn as our interim coach and not only provided little support, but he threw him to the wolves by letting healthy players walk out of their contracts and loaning others to rival clubs, during one of our worst injury hit seasons in history.

Not his fault my arse mate. He was the culprit.
Click to expand...
Don’t agree, this is a glass half empty look at what sheens has done! Cherry-picking at its best, only select the comments that back your weak arguments.
What about dropping two places every year Fadge was here before sheens arrived?? What about when Sheens refused to sack the Fadge the year before, when everyone was crying out for it?? And ti give him a go in the next season, only for the Fadge to fail again with 5 LOSSES to start the season???
Yep all Sheens fault, non on Fadge, we were just about to turn the corner!!!
On Ciraldo, from all accounts he gave a verbal to sign if the Fadge was gone! Only for him to do the backdown after media continuously hammered us in the press. Stating Ciraldo would be mad to sign with us, quoting ‘who would sign an unproven coach for 5 years’. ( Most likely spearheaded by Gus and his mates no doubt).
Yep all Sheens fault, seriously no idea!!!
Oh and don’t forget our best recruitment in possibly a decade, but that wasn’t Sheens that was Fadge. Sheens as football manager had nothing to do with these signings, nothing at all!
Please…
 
BrendonWT said:
well if everything we are hearing is true

we resigned doueihi for a extra year but we want moses for 24

doueihi’s previously said
“play me at 6 or let me play nsw cup”

and moses wont play without his bromance partner

the math aint mathing unless
1: our slimey valentine has swiftly rejected us
2: AD had an attitude switch
3. our toxic ex has accepted the PO for 24’ and we’ll have a sequel to this debacle in post season 23’
all still speculation
Click to expand...
bullshit
 
Demps said:
Don't believe everything you read ahk.
Click to expand...
im hoping it was a false narrative but we’ll see how things go if the moses situation plays out the way most of us are wanting.
sadly 3 men can not play 2 positions its definately going to be intriguing
 
BrendonWT said:
im hoping it was a false narrative but we’ll see how things go if the moses situation plays out the way most of us are wanting.
sadly 3 men can not play 2 positions its definately going to be intriguing
Click to expand...
To me it seems, AD was just keen to get some game time under his belt in his preferred position.

Floated the idea, but in no way demanded it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Staff online

Members online

Total: 698 (members: 36, guests: 662)
Forever online: Tigergran, Geo
Back
Top