Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

BrendonWT said:
i actually highly rate him & would love him to stay with the club even longer than 24!
i was not making him look bad at all
it is okay to discuss rumors for what they are without ill intent. never once did i state it was fact 😌
Click to expand...
Righto mate...all good

The fact the clubs given him an extension suggests the clubs happy with him and hes happy at the club...onwards etc
 
BrendonWT said:
i actually highly rate him & would love him to stay with the club even longer than 24!
i was not making him look bad at all
it is okay to discuss rumors for what they are without ill intent. never once did i state it was fact 😌
Click to expand...
I'm sure I read him clarifying that story by saying that he was saying to Noddy that he thought he'd probably get a bit more confidence and game sharpness coming back through cup
 
  • Like
Reactions: 851
people talking about a luke brooks extension is so sad its funny.

in ten years we are all going to be watching classic nrl games from this past decade and look at the Luke Brooks era as one of those one you are soooo glad it's done. the sooner the better for me.

(assuming tv channels can actually find a classic wests tigers game with luke brooks in it)

like watching old games with ben black, jacob miller, craig field, darren senter, etc. you watch those games thinking... "geeze we were sh*t, thank god we're not back there again"... but low and behold we have brooks for 10 years and maybe another 4 - typical tigers.

BTW same goes for AD. I know that's more contentious but I can't wait for a fresh pair of halves.
 
Jedi_Tiger said:
wait Paws if Moses arrives at Concord (think he will) Brooks will probably be on a restructured 4 year deal.
If Moses doesn't sign then simple the club go back to Brooks and Isaac and are like that 4 year deal is now 3 years or go find another club. He wont leave sydney which does limit options a bit.
Click to expand...
Can’t see Brooks taking unders.
He has been quoted (not hearsay) saying he will be ‘greedy’ with his next contract.
 
batboy said:
Senter?
Showing your age / grasp there buddy....

You get that a team needs halves yeah?
There's 5 (Or there abouts) worthy of discussing in each position in the game...
17 Teams, 5/6's - 5/7's...

The NRL isn't bunings (This one doesn't work, I'll get that one)
Until we have other options, We got what we got.
Click to expand...

signing brooks and AD on extensions doesn't help us... particulalry for long deals because we have to tie them up before someone else does. every year we have them is another year we are not looking for someone else. short term pain for long term gain.

and this comment was made in relation to people talking about offering brooks a long term extension.

And yes I'm 40. So i've seen alot of rugby league including rebuilds and how success is achieved.

Im just trying to make sure you dont have to go through the pain that other 40 year olds have gone through... hopefully you'll have better days
 
vlad said:
Brad Arthur interviewed before the trial game said he asked Mitch if was staying in front of everyone & he didn’t give him an answer .
Click to expand...

Strange last year he was commenting on Papa when he had signed with us about him staying at Parra. But hey he has already signed with Parra weeks ago according to some.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 851
tigermate said:
signing brooks and AD on extensions doesn't help us... particulalry for long deals because we have to tie them up before someone else does. every year we have them is another year we are not looking for someone else. short term pain for long term gain.

and this comment was made in relation to people talking about offering brooks a long term extension.

And yes I'm 40. So i've seen alot of rugby league including rebuilds and how success is achieved.

Im just trying to make sure you dont have to go through the pain that other 40 year olds have gone through... hopefully you'll have better days
Click to expand...
AD was a yeah. reportedly Brooks is longer term lower value. doesn't help if you dont drop him if he's trash
 
Alltheway said:
Don’t agree, this is a glass half empty look at what sheens has done! Cherry-picking at its best, only select the comments that back your weak arguments.
What about dropping two places every year Fadge was here before sheens arrived?? What about when Sheens refused to sack the Fadge the year before, when everyone was crying out for it?? And ti give him a go in the next season, only for the Fadge to fail again with 5 LOSSES to start the season???
Yep all Sheens fault, non on Fadge, we were just about to turn the corner!!!
On Ciraldo, from all accounts he gave a verbal to sign if the Fadge was gone! Only for him to do the backdown after media continuously hammered us in the press. Stating Ciraldo would be mad to sign with us, quoting ‘who would sign an unproven coach for 5 years’. ( Most likely spearheaded by Gus and his mates no doubt).
Yep all Sheens fault, seriously no idea!!!
Oh and don’t forget our best recruitment in possibly a decade, but that wasn’t Sheens that was Fadge. Sheens as football manager had nothing to do with these signings, nothing at all!
Please…
Click to expand...
I really don’t get the need for calling Madge Fadge.
It may be funny to you and your mates but it’s disrespectful. My dad would of given me a clip on the back of the head
For what it’s worth it doesn’t validate your point any further
Madge wasn’t the best coach as per results but facts are undeniable so no need to degrade the bloke
 
Man, Moses is so light on his feet and his timing and footwork, anyone who doesn’t think we should be patient in the chance we can actually get him is crazy, hopefully we do get an answer soon though just so I can stop googling Mitch Moses 30 times a week looking for new articles
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Staff online

Members online

Total: 688 (members: 38, guests: 650)
Back
Top