I'm of a different opinion. I'm willing to be plenty of thought went into the decision; however, it was based on AD and Brooks being able to perform behind a better pack. As we know the premise was flawed.
There is no doubt that they know they got that decision wrong - they may be arrogant but they aren't stupid.
It was a clear strategy to focus on developing a better pack and assess the performance of the halves and backline in 23 with a view to recruiting a solution for 24. The pursuit of Munster and Moses indicates that we always knew there was a deficiency - and they are looking for a solution.
Despite the pain so far I think we can take some positives away. If we were winning some games some would be tempted to keep AD, probably as depth, partner Brooks with a real half, and look for better finishing options. What they have proven is that neither AD or Brooks meet the standard required and that must really sting the "grown ups" at WT. I trust that it hurts enough for them to do something positive.
If we can, it would good to get someone held back at another club in on a short term contract; however, this should be pursued in concert with getting a known quantity for 24.