Not all true.
They actually questioned Manly's signing of Brooks, and that once DCE retires a halves pairing of Brooks/Schuster would be a disaster.
Benji was in Fiji. The rumours of them butting heads was from before that.
Them questioning why they would let go of Fainu and sign Brooks makes sense. Why let go one of the so called most promising players in the game and sign Brooks? It's a fair question. If it's not talent, is it off field stuff they've seen? They could have kept him by not signing Brooks and if they were that pressed for cash, not offering Schuster as much.
I do agree that sometimes, especially Hooper, it's over the top.
All goes away when we start to see success. For a club who hasn't been in the finals for over a decade we can be very precious.