I never accused you of being a racist - that is you playing the victim. I never asked you to make these proclamations about whether or not you're racist or what your family background is. As you point out, I don't know anything about you nor do I particularly care to learn. I also know you weren't the first person to mention race in this thread. But let's be fair, you weren't responding to anyone saying "if you criticise Lattrell Mitchell about anything you're a racist" - you decided to say that's what would happen, even though it hasn't. Yours happened to be the comment along these lines that I responded to, and I don't think the fact it wasn't the first one really makes any difference.
It's also fascinating that you're now talking about Mitchell "using his heritage as a get out clause". I know he has referred to his heritage in the past when he's been criticised for off-field stuff. But we're talking here about his on-field performance, where to the best of my knowledge he hasn't said anything about this. If you can point me to Mitchell saying the reason he's been putting in shithouse performances at fullback is because he's Indigenous and that somehow makes it ok I will wholeheartedly agree with you. But I bet you can't.
There's another response on this thread from someone saying race is important to this conversation because Aboriginal footballers tend to be lazy. Now, as it happens, I tend to think that is quite a racist perspective even if the commenter thinks he's seen enough examples of it that it's "just an observation". You haven't done that, which is why I haven't called you a racist. Which is why my only question to you has been: why did you think it was important to bring up race at all?
Don't feel the need to respond to this - believe it or not I'm not particularly interested in having some internet guy telling me I'm a "pontificating pseudo intellect" (you'll notice that I haven't said anything rude about you at any stage, even though you are consistently responding as if I have). Maybe you could just give some thought to why you didn't feel it was permissable for you to voice your entirely unrelated to race criticisms of Lattrell Mitchell as a footballer, when it is very clear that lots of people are doing exactly that with no blowback whatsoever. It never crossed my mind that if I said Mitchell is burgling a living putting in zero effort at fullback I'd be called a racist; why did you assume that you would?