Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

That's why I think just as important for Fulton will be recruiting T&T and NSW Cup players on minimum wage for depth & experience.

As a club, we're in a position where we probably have to grant Top 30s to our top juniors like Da Silva, Galvin to keep them here.

I'd then load our Development deals to our next tier of identified pathways players to progress like the Laulilii brothers, Miller, Mason etc.

Train & Trials to players with experience for depth & leadership like a Dean Hawkins or Kurt Falls type who can't get top 30 deal but provide depth & also some potential x-factor types like your Jimmy Ngutliks.

Then some strategic NSW Cup contracts to players who can be leaders at that level and provide experience to our pathways players coming up (more of the Jack Boyling types).
That’s why it’s probably a really sound decision by the NRL to change the contract availability for players either not signed to top 30 or in top 30 but very short of experience.
Take Galvin for example. Some are saying he would be available for 25 season to clubs from November this year but this new clause states that he can only be considered on market until round 6 next year.
Then there is the 10 day cooling off option for the current club’s right of reply. All fair changes.
Restoring the June 30 deadline is better as well.
 
That's why I think just as important for Fulton will be recruiting T&T and NSW Cup players on minimum wage for depth & experience.

As a club, we're in a position where we probably have to grant Top 30s to our top juniors like Da Silva, Galvin to keep them here.

I'd then load our Development deals to our next tier of identified pathways players to progress like the Laulilii brothers, Miller, Mason etc.

Train & Trials to players with experience for depth & leadership like a Dean Hawkins or Kurt Falls type who can't get top 30 deal but provide depth & also some potential x-factor types like your Jimmy Ngutliks.

Then some strategic NSW Cup contracts to players who can be leaders at that level and provide experience to our pathways players coming up (more of the Jack Boyling types).
On the money - extend that down into Flegg and we will have the depth required to build a next man up mentality. Without the depth that is nothing but a dream.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 851
I don't think that the results in the junior grades this year are a good indicator of the quality of individuals. The injuries and instability in first grade has huge flow on effects down the grades. If they are in and out every week they can't build combinations which particularly shows up in defence, particularly in the KOE where defence is always secondary anyway. We also have multiple teams in some of the lower grades so the talent may be spread among the Balmain and Wests sides. There are a lot of kids in a lot of teams. If Sheens says there are stars among them I'm inclined to believe him. I do however agree that we need to be a lot better at figuring out which ones will make it and which won't. I feel John Morris coming in will help a lot with this, he had a lot to do with it at the Sharks by all accounts.
Well..u simply cant ignore the ingloriuos results.....Injuries and stuff are the same for every team.
.If theres a stand out amongst all that,then lets move him forward..and weve probaly done that with one or two who btw hve never played against grown men and been fully tested.
As for Sheens judgement...think is is full of it tbh in the current era,although did get Bula right.
Cant believe with such a huge nursery of juniors we have so few coming thru vs Panthers
 
  • Like
Reactions: 851

Latest posts

Back
Top