Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

Coastie_Tiger said:
Thats motivation for these young guys imo, you perform and keep your place you will be rewarded. In Bula's case not only did he perform but he exceeded expectations massively, you have to attribute that to his character.
Inevitably you are going to get these guys who have talent but can't or don't perform when they get their opportunity and they move on. Maybe they do better in another system it happens, we will lose some that turn out to be decent and probably retain some that are not up to it. Tumeth is an example of that imo he is not up to it his extension was a mistake he's someone i'd like to see the club move on, perhaps he performs elsewhere.
Click to expand...
Agree. The key is not setting the bar beyond reasonable expectations.
 
The Chad said:
Reilly showed ability.

But, it's been this 'written in stone' belief of so many young players coming through the ranks that has bitten the club over & over.

Reilly might turn out good. But, until he EARNS that role, he must have decent competition to beat out. The club needs 2 guys, wingers, centres or a combination of both, to make Tupou, To'a, Reilly etc WIN their starting positions. Not just get them because there's not much else.

Momorovski, Hymel Hunt, Corey Allen...these guys fit. Good enough to hold the spot. Not so good that they block the path of the young talent coming through. It makes the club depth that much better if your top line guys are not just handed a position.
Click to expand...
These three are not upgrades on To'a and Tupou as centres, particularly on ceiling alone.

I look at centres stocks across the league as a tiered system.

Top tier would be elite talent, eg, Manu. Quality tier would be rep-quality centres that can, but don't consistently, turn or dictate games, eg, Staggs, Best. Solid tier would be regular first grade centres that are consistently picked and do a decent job, eg, Reimis Smith, Ramien.

Then there's a split tier, you have your journeymen or spot fillers that are good enough, have maxed out their ability, whilst their team is often exploring an upgrade if they can, eg, Momirovski, Allen, Hunt. The other half is the young, inconsistent, but have shown potential to be quality, eg, Tupou, To'a and even someone along the lines of Lomax.

In my opinion, there is very little point moving between the split tier, unless you see someone in that tier that has a particular skill set that suits your team's playing style better than who you currently have. Otherwise, it's a redundant move.

Personally, of players in the split tier, I would mostly lean towards the high ceiling types, as I'd be willing to forgo instant results if it means a greater outcome in terms of the quality of that player in the long term. The caveat to that would be to have the ability to rapidly identify those that will not reach those heights and make a change.

So, for me, I would avoid those types of names you mentioned, considering who we have on deck. Though, that's not to say I wouldn't definitely be looking for an upgrade at centre if there are options in those higher tiers.

Centre is a funny position..
 
Last edited:
earl said:
He signed a long term contract but he is exactly what we need. We need some class.

That is why I think we are dependent on guys like Fainu, Sullivan, Galvin and maybe even both Laulilii's.

Recruiting those guys once they've made it is really hard because there are only so many established stars who leave their teams and it's not many at all.
Click to expand...
is Galvin leaving the club ?
 
earl said:
He signed a long term contract but he is exactly what we need. We need some class.

That is why I think we are dependent on guys like Fainu, Sullivan, Galvin and maybe even both Laulilii's.

Recruiting those guys once they've made it is really hard because there are only so many established stars who leave their teams and it's not many at all.
Click to expand...
With four Qld teams, the number of Qld players moving to Sydney or Melbourne may reduce. The squeeze will be on for available talent in Sydney. With our large junior areas, this is where we have a large advantage over some other Sydney teams and the Storm.
 
Kelce68 said:
These three are not upgrades on To'a and Tupou as centres, particularly on ceiling alone.

I look at centres stocks across the league as a tiered system.

Top tier would be elite talent, eg, Manu. Quality tier would be rep-quality centres that can, but don't consistently, turn or dictate games, eg, Staggs, Best. Solid tier would be regular first grade centres that are consistently picked and do a decent job, eg, Reimis Smith, Ramien.

Then there's a split tier, you have your journeymen or spot fillers that are good enough, have maxed out their ability, whilst their team is often exploring an upgrade if they can, eg, Momirovski, Allen, Hunt. The other half is the young, inconsistent, but have shown potential to be quality, eg, Tupou, To'a and even someone along the lines of Lomax.

In my opinion, there is very little point moving between the split tier, unless you see someone in that tier that has a particular skill set that suits your team's playing style better than who you currently have. Otherwise, it's a redundant move.

Personally, of players in the split tier, I would mostly lean towards the high ceiling types, as I'd be willing to forgo instant results if it means a greater outcome in terms of the quality of that player in the long term. The caveat to that would be to have the ability to rapidly identify those that will not reach those heights and make a change.

So, for me, I would avoid those types of names you mentioned, considering who we have on deck. Though, that's not to say I wouldn't definitely be looking for an upgrade at centre if there are options in those higher tiers.

Centre is a funny position..
Click to expand...
You would have to say that there really are very few 'Elite" tier centres in the whole league currently. Manu is on a bit of an island, you'd maybe put someone like Val Holmes in there but he really lacked consistency this year.
And you'd have to assume that the lack is centres is directly related to the salary scaling of spine positions and as a result the likes of Latrell Mitchell, Stephen Critchon and Hamiso Fidow taking more money to play FB even if they aren't nearly as effective in that role.
 
AdelaideTiger said:
You would have to say that there really are very few 'Elite" tier centres in the whole league currently. Manu is on a bit of an island, you'd maybe put someone like Val Holmes in there but he really lacked consistency this year.
And you'd have to assume that the lack is centres is directly related to the salary scaling of spine positions and as a result the likes of Latrell Mitchell, Stephen Critchon and Hamiso Fidow taking more money to play FB even if they aren't nearly as effective in that role.
Click to expand...
Yeh, I agree.

Latrell would be top tier, if he played centre.

Crichton and Hammer probably one down, along with Holmes.

But you're bang on the money, unfortunately, NRL talent is a zero-sum game, at least in the current market, meaning that both players chasing positional money as you mentioned and, teams pilfering quality talent from other clubs means that not everyone can have top-shelf centres. You either over pay and risk your cap getting out of whack, or, with the Tigers, your buying options are reduced due to lack of quality player interest, so you're forced to develop centres from within and hope, as well as being shoehorned into spending your cap in other areas of need (even if centre is a dire concern).

Whilst this is not unique to centre as a position, its an interesting case study given the deficiencies in our squad at the moment.
 
Kelce68 said:
Yeh, I agree.

Latrell would be top tier, if he played centre.

Crichton and Hammer probably one down, along with Holmes.

But you're bang on the money, unfortunately, NRL talent is a zero-sum game, at least in the current market, meaning that both players chasing positional money as you mentioned and, teams pilfering quality talent from other clubs means that not everyone can have top-shelf centres. You either over pay and risk your cap getting out of whack, or, with the Tigers, your buying options are reduced due to lack of quality player interest, so you're forced to develop centres from within and hope, as well as being shoehorned into spending your cap in other areas of need (even if centre is a dire concern).

Whilst this is not unique to centre as a position, its an interesting case study given the deficiencies in our squad at the moment.
Click to expand...
Which tier would you have Dane Gagai?

If we can jag him from the Knights by adding an extra year onto his contract so we have him for 2 years, he will provide invaluable experience & leadership to a young outside back group.

By then the likes of T'oa, Tupou, Feledy, Solo Saukuru, Nav Willett, Roy Quiroz-Mapasua, maybe Triston Reilly, maybe Lachlan Galvin (if he becomes a centre) will be our core.

Maybe we can offer Knights AJ Kepaoa as a centre/backrow utility?!
 
BlackWhiteGold said:
Which tier would you have Dane Gagai?

If we can jag him from the Knights by adding an extra year onto his contract so we have him for 2 years, he will provide invaluable experience & leadership to a young outside back group.

By then the likes of T'oa, Tupou, Feledy, Solo Saukuru, Nav Willett, Roy Quiroz-Mapasua, maybe Triston Reilly, maybe Lachlan Galvin (if he becomes a centre) will be our core.

Maybe we can offer Knights AJ Kepaoa as a centre/backrow utility?!
Click to expand...
I mean, my silly scale is all arbitrary BWG, but, if Gagai still has a couple of years left in the legs, he'd still sit in the solid tier. Proven high level performer who has dropped back from his best footy to be a strong, consistent performer.

It would all depend on how his legs feel for mine. Truth be told, I didn't watch a great deal of Newcastle this year, so I'm not completely around his 2023 form, but from what I've seen, that's where I'd put him.

He'd be an upgrade for sure, albeit a small and temporary one.
 
AdelaideTiger said:
You would have to say that there really are very few 'Elite" tier centres in the whole league currently. Manu is on a bit of an island, you'd maybe put someone like Val Holmes in there but he really lacked consistency this year.
And you'd have to assume that the lack is centres is directly related to the salary scaling of spine positions and as a result the likes of Latrell Mitchell, Stephen Critchon and Hamiso Fidow taking more money to play FB even if they aren't nearly as effective in that role.
Click to expand...
I’d argue ‘the gifted one’ is up there. But needs to be more consistent. Has all the tools of the trade to be the best centre in the game.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 827 (members: 42, guests: 785)
Back
Top