Short term anarchy is the only option when resistance is strong. That's the whole point. You don't topple a dictatorship through negotiation. You do it by applying enough force.
Sure we can try the discrete route first, ask the board members to all (exc Dorahy) step down, but will they all relinquish their own power, even if that's what the review recommends? I have my doubts, but will stand corrected if they do.
Negative publicity? Back to back spoons, and basket cases through management and executive. We've rightfully been copping bad publicity for years, we're a laughing stock!!!!! The media have been criticising our board for years. The fact that something is happening to generate change is widely regarded as a positive in footy circles. Everyone expects us to do nothing because we're such a mess
Us winning back to back spoons is costing us far more fans, members, sponsors, player signings etc. Changes at board level don't deter fans and members, losing does. Doing the same thing that sees us come last is madness. As soon as we can become a more professionally run organisation we'll also be able to better capitalise from sponsors etc.
The only way we can stop the rot is by chopping the head off the snake.
