You have absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Melbourne are willing to offer anything of any consequence in return for Blore in 2024. You're basing this exclusively on the clubs having discussed an Olam/Blore swap - which, as I say, was pretty clearly a case of Melbourne thinking they might be able to get something they want in return for something they want to get rid of.Melbourne are missing enough of a forward pack that, YES they want Blore for 2024.
Considering how much depth they are missing there. Yes Melbourne want Blore and more forwards.
Ofcourse, they might see us as a laughing stock. I would agree.
But for Melbourne that "
Means no top 4 finish. They want that.
Ofcourse they could go and do something different. Accept their team needs a rest for a year. Let players heal, like Blore who has had a stack of injuries and a year as a bench/reserve grade player would be good.
All in all I doubt it. We need a solid Center, Melbourne really need forwards and need them more then we need a center.
We pretty much know Melbourne don't have any use for Olam, so of course they'd be happy to let him go to a club that's willing to pay his salary. We actually don't need to give them Blore for that - the swap aspect of the deal wasn't for Olam, it was for Olam's contract: you can have Blore if you pay most of Olam's salary.
You can't just imagine that Melbourne believe Blore is the difference between making the top four and not doing so (which is a ridiculous concept straight off the bat) and then demand the Tigers make a trade based on this desperation you have made up.