WT Ownership, The Board & Senior Management - MEGA Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
While we are ar it......can someone please remind me what Pasco has done for the club...OR.... should he stay. Whichever is more justifiable and easier to write.....
 
The pigs will be there...... paparazzi and cousins , friends, and that guy down at the pub.... everyone has a story.. it will all come out.. How will you know? Competition table position.
 
Richo would be brilliant. get it done WT.

Richo would be a coup.

But of course irony is that the people who are looking to get this done are the current board who some want replaced.

The same board who recently appointed Benji and will probably ensnare Luai.

The sticking point is Richardson wants a consultant's role which is a type of football operations review.
 
Explain to me who is the "Balmain" faction. Stapleton? One man makes up a faction?

Stapleton is an accomplished board member......nearly 20 years good times and bad.

That type of experience supersedes other qualifications.

He is also the important voice for matters pertaining to the Balmain influence within the WT.

Probably what is wanted by some on here, especially former Balmain fans is an ending of majority Wests Magpies control of the club especially since Balmains unfortunate financial demise and this is manifesting in all sorts of round about ways.

But what they don't get is that control is via the HBG which was set up primarily by Wests ownership to provide for an inclusive stable identity structure for all fans, Wests, Balmain and Wests Tigers.

We have all much to lose if this changes.
 
Last edited:
Stapleton is an accomplished board member......nearly 20 years good times and bad.

That type of experience supersedes other qualifications.

He is also the important voice for matters pertaining to the Balmain influence within the WT.

Probably what is wanted by some on here, especially former Balmain fans is an ending of majority Wests Magpies control of the club especially since Balmains unfortunate financial demise and this is manifesting in all sorts of round about ways.

But what they don't get is that control is via the HBG which was set up primarily by Wests ownership to provide for an inclusive stable identity structure for all fans, Wests, Balmain and Wests Tigers.

We have all much to loose if this changes.
yes.......would hate to loose (sic) all the unbridled success that the current structure has brought us.
 
The next question is, how do we know if the board fully apply all of the recommendations of the report? Maybe they make a change or two and say they listened, but if the report called for wholesale changes then they haven't actually endorsed the findings of the review.

It's tricky as making the findings public is unlikely, but there's no transparency otherwise either.

This shouldn't be for public consumption.

The review was petioned by certain people supposedly as a means of helping the club find remedies for improvement.

Having gained signatures they presented the petition to the club who decided to proceed.

Having proceeded the club has fully implemented what Cochise and co requested.

Matter ends there.

The club as a privately owned group is under no obligation to make the review public. Why should they in any case. Unlike Parramatta or Cronulla there weren't any serious breaches or allegations . And besides they are in current discussions with high profile players and Richardson. Do we need the media.

The petitioners request has been fulfilled.

It should end there.
 
Last edited:
This shouldn't be for public consumption.

The review was petioned by certain people supposedly as a means of helping the club find remedies for improvement.

Having gained signatures they presented the petition to the club who decided to proceed.

Having proceeded the club has fully implemented what Cochise and co requested.

Matter ends there.

The club as a privately owned group is under no obligation to make the review public. Why should they in any case. Unlike Parramatta or Cronulla there weren't any serious breaches or allegations . And besides they are in current discussions with high profile players and Richardson. Do we need the media.

If the petitioners request has been fulfilled.

It should end there.
It wont though...its too big
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top