AmericanHistoryX
Well-known member
Meeting tonight?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not according to Lee H. WT board is not meeting but Holman Barnes board is.Meeting tonight?
That's the important oneNot according to Lee H. WT board is not meeting but Holman Barnes board is.
Thats the one that countsNot according to Lee H. WT board is not meeting but Holman Barnes board is.
Undoubtedly but I'll be surprised if there's much, if any, information released publicly tomorrow.Thats the one that counts
Sounds like today's world. Could be too late.All I’m hoping for is we follow the rules of Taronga Park and stop putting the mongooses in with the snakes and the Hyenas with the lions.
😂 you got it.Its almost like Split Ends
Richo would be brilliant. get it done WT.
Explain to me who is the "Balmain" faction. Stapleton? One man makes up a faction?
yes.......would hate to loose (sic) all the unbridled success that the current structure has brought us.Stapleton is an accomplished board member......nearly 20 years good times and bad.
That type of experience supersedes other qualifications.
He is also the important voice for matters pertaining to the Balmain influence within the WT.
Probably what is wanted by some on here, especially former Balmain fans is an ending of majority Wests Magpies control of the club especially since Balmains unfortunate financial demise and this is manifesting in all sorts of round about ways.
But what they don't get is that control is via the HBG which was set up primarily by Wests ownership to provide for an inclusive stable identity structure for all fans, Wests, Balmain and Wests Tigers.
We have all much to loose if this changes.
The next question is, how do we know if the board fully apply all of the recommendations of the report? Maybe they make a change or two and say they listened, but if the report called for wholesale changes then they haven't actually endorsed the findings of the review.
It's tricky as making the findings public is unlikely, but there's no transparency otherwise either.
It wont though...its too bigThis shouldn't be for public consumption.
The review was petioned by certain people supposedly as a means of helping the club find remedies for improvement.
Having gained signatures they presented the petition to the club who decided to proceed.
Having proceeded the club has fully implemented what Cochise and co requested.
Matter ends there.
The club as a privately owned group is under no obligation to make the review public. Why should they in any case. Unlike Parramatta or Cronulla there weren't any serious breaches or allegations . And besides they are in current discussions with high profile players and Richardson. Do we need the media.
If the petitioners request has been fulfilled.
It should end there.
Also small..... in how the world works or how deep your mind goes.It wont though...its too big