CEO - Shane Richardson

Status
Not open for further replies.
We went backwards when he was here. I don’t need photoshop
You’re arresting the wrong suspect.

They controlled him, his shortcomings belong to them.

They thought he was ok, not his fault.

He was not all good but not all bad. I think that’s the most accurate portrayal.
 
Last edited:
You’re arresting the wrong suspect.

They controlled him, his shortcomings belong to them.
This is becoming a tedious circular argument aimed at absolving the CEO of any responsibility!

Pascoe has to own his failings as do the entire Board - who themselves were sacked as a result of the INDEPENDENT review!

The Board were demonstrably negligent in not removing the incompetent CEO and identifying the Chairman's position was untenable much earlier - and they were subsequently held to account via the review!

The biggest flaw of the Board was they were too ignorant - comfortable and unambitious - and failed to identify that Pascoe and Hagipantelis were so far out of their depth it was laughable and their decision making was directly causing massive erosion of the Wests Tigers brand capital!

Pascoe was evidently asked to finally step aside as a result of the review - and without the Chairman's protection he had to take his medicine!

Good riddance to all of them!
 
I met with Pascoe on and off for about 3 years with The Ambush, until about 2022 (so did the others in the group). Enough times to get a good sense of the guy.

Whatever your opinion of his performance as a CEO, he's definitely not a dope. He has a laid back style and I don't think that works for everyone. He's confident for sure. I suspect this personality plays very well in male-dominated business, i.e. football, and works well with sponsors.

I honestly don't think you can get to and hold the position of CEO of an NRL club if you are a moron. It's just too cut-throat. Even boys-club type appointments within the code don't last if the candidate doesn't have the smarts.

I'm not a Pascoe booster but honestly I liked the guy, as a person. But definitely not a dummy.

Never met Lee H.
I've met him too - and I would 100% disagree with your assertion that Pascoe is not a dummy!

You only have to look at his ignorance of the salary cap rules when we were breached for a post-playing career employment offer to Farah (that never even materialsed) because he self reported to the SMH in an attempt to soften the blow of sacking a club legend because of a shit coach...

He's a fricking idiot!

I just have higher standards or expectations of intelligence for any CEO level candidate!
 
Last edited:
You’re arresting the wrong suspect.

They controlled him, his shortcomings belong to them.

They thought he was ok, not his fault.

He was not all good but not all bad. I think that’s the most accurate portrayal.
CEO doesn’t get to blame someone else in my opinion. The buck stops with him. He should be better at managing up.
 
I met with Pascoe on and off for about 3 years with The Ambush, until about 2022 (so did the others in the group). Enough times to get a good sense of the guy.

Whatever your opinion of his performance as a CEO, he's definitely not a dope. He has a laid back style and I don't think that works for everyone. He's confident for sure. I suspect this personality plays very well in male-dominated business, i.e. football, and works well with sponsors.

I honestly don't think you can get to and hold the position of CEO of an NRL club if you are a moron. It's just too cut-throat. Even boys-club type appointments within the code don't last if the candidate doesn't have the smarts.

I'm not a Pascoe booster but honestly I liked the guy, as a person. But definitely not a dummy.

Never met Lee H.
If you don’t have anything nice to say about someone… in reference to the ex-chairman
 
I've met him too - and I would 100% disagree with your assertion that Pascoe is not a dummy!

You only have to look at his ignorance of the salary cap rules when we were breached for a post-playing career employment offer to Farah (that never even materialsed) because he self reported to the SMH in an attempt to soften the blow of sacking a club legend because of a shit coach...

He's a fricking idiot!

I just have higher standards or expectations of intelligence for any CEO level candidate!
Agreed.
If he wasn't a dummy then he did a great job of portraying one!
 
CEO doesn’t get to blame someone else in my opinion. The buck stops with him. He should be better at managing up.
It’s not a matter of blaming anyone, it’s where the culpability ultimately lies.

That rests with the board.

They backed him, they own him.

They decided to keep him and for some unknown reason believed in him.

He’s not the offender here. He didnt manage or employ himself.
 
If i was Richo, at risk of bad pr, I would have kept him on in some junior role, head in the books, ask him many questions about what he’s been doing, milk his knowledge of the club.

So that the things he was doing well are preserved.

I wouldn’t have him dealing with players or agents, no media and no authority to do much at all.

Once I was satisfied that all the juice was squeezed from the lemon to help me and the new executive, unless he can code or add value elsewhere, then I would sack him!
 
Last edited:
If i was Richo, at risk of bad pr, I would have kept him on in some junior role, head in the books, ask him many questions about what he’s been doing, milk his knowledge of the club.

So that the things he was doing well are preserved.

I wouldn’t have him dealing with players or agents, no media and no authority to do much at all.

Once I was satisfied that all the juice was squeezed from the lemon to help me and the new executive, unless he can code or add value elsewhere, then I would sack him.
Richo has said he has a blueprint for salvaging footy clubs who are lost causes which has served him well. I believe Richo’s forgotten more about rugby league administration than our last mob ever knew. Just hope he sees it through.
 
It’s not a matter of blaming anyone, it’s where the culpability ultimately lies.

That rests with the board.

They backed him, they own him.

They decided to keep him and for some unknown reason believed in him.

He’s not the offender here. He didnt manage or employ himself.
He basically did - with the equally incompetent Chair's nepotisic complicity!

Should have been sacked after the salary cap breach - ignorance of basic salary cap principles demonstrates criminal levels of ineptitude!!

Instead - he got a paid holiday on the club during an NRL imposed ban - while the fine wiped out the club's working profit for that year - and our cap was significantly reduced for three seasons!

The CEO and Chair report to and provide recommendations to the Board.

The Board were hopeless because they had the wool pulled over their eyes by this shonky oxygen thief masquerading as CEO and the spiv idiot Chairman's $$$...

But the CEO and Chair peddling their lies and tooting their own horns were leading the Board astray - and needed to be the first ones to go!

A quality CEO and Chair can make a dysfunctional Board better - not the other way around!
 
If i was Richo, at risk of bad pr, I would have kept him on in some junior role, head in the books, ask him many questions about what he’s been doing, milk his knowledge of the club.

So that the things he was doing well are preserved.

I wouldn’t have him dealing with players or agents, no media and no authority to do much at all.

Once I was satisfied that all the juice was squeezed from the lemon to help me and the new executive, unless he can code or add value elsewhere, then I would sack him!
Yes, that’s a smart way of operating.
 
If i was Richo, at risk of bad pr, I would have kept him on in some junior role, head in the books, ask him many questions about what he’s been doing, milk his knowledge of the club.

So that the things he was doing well are preserved.

I wouldn’t have him dealing with players or agents, no media and no authority to do much at all.

Once I was satisfied that all the juice was squeezed from the lemon to help me and the new executive, unless he can code or add value elsewhere, then I would sack him!
Thank %$#%^& you were not part of the review Mrs Pascoe!!

He was a juiceless lemon from day dot!

There was nothing he was doing well - and he was lucky there wasn't a proper audit of the club's entertaining expenses/corporate card use under Lee and his tenure...
 
If i was Richo, at risk of bad pr, I would have kept him on in some junior role, head in the books, ask him many questions about what he’s been doing, milk his knowledge of the club.

So that the things he was doing well are preserved.

I wouldn’t have him dealing with players or agents, no media and no authority to do much at all.

Once I was satisfied that all the juice was squeezed from the lemon to help me and the new executive, unless he can code or add value elsewhere, then I would sack him!

ROFL, can see that convo

Richo “Hey Justin Let’s demote you from the CEO position into a Wikipedia”

Justin’s “I’m good at getting sponsors & will fund my page, I’m up for that”

Richo “really, you have 1hr to collect your stuff”

We are meant to be a professional organization. Hiring a CEO comes with significant expectations that they know what they’re doing and if they’re replacing a punted CEO it’s because a new direction is wanted - not let’s follow what the other CEO was doing.
 
ROFL, can see that convo

Richo “Hey Justin Let’s demote you from the CEO position into a Wikipedia”

Justin’s “I’m good at getting sponsors & will fund my page, I’m up for that”

Richo “really, you have 1hr to collect your stuff”

We are meant to be a professional organization. Hiring a CEO comes with significant expectations that they know what they’re doing and if they’re replacing a punted CEO it’s because a new direction is wanted - not let’s follow what the other CEO was doing.
I think it’s much better for Richo to understand the challenges he is facing before rushing in like a bull in a China shop.

He’s best served to get this background from many sources including Justin.

It doesn’t mean he has to follow any pre-existing direction, or copy any old policy, but he can bank the knowledge and compare and contrast it to other sources. Then he can apply his own concepts more skilfully and artfully.

The surviving employees may be quick to sing their own virtues and give him false impressions.

He may well decide some aspects of the club admin don’t need changing at all as they are operating ok.

He also has to consider overall staff morale and what motivates people.

Get the balance right, and for that he needs info.

He hasn’t replaced every staff member, just a select few at the moment.

And as any manager will tell you, you don’t fire people who are productive and value add. You need these people.

They are not always easily replaced.

He cannot stop the ship from sinking on his own. He relies on many others.

His job is to make the right decisions and that may well be changing only a few things. It depends what he uncovers and also, what the alternatives are.

But knowledge is critical.

If there are staff issues, sure he may have to make some brutal and tough decisions. That’s what he’s there for.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: BZN
I think it’s much better for Richo to understand the challenges he is facing before rushing in like a bull in a China shop.

He’s best served to get this background from many sources including Justin.

It doesn’t mean he has to follow any pre-existing direction, or copy any old policy, but he can bank the knowledge and compare and contrast it to other sources. Then he can apply his own concepts more skilfully and artfully.

The surviving employees may be quick to sing their own virtues and give him false impressions.

He may well decide some aspects of the club admin don’t need changing at all as they are operating ok.

He also has to consider overall staff morale and what motivates people.

Get the balance right, and for that he needs info.

He hasn’t replaced every staff member, just a select few at the moment.

And as any manager will tell you, you don’t fire people who are productive and value add. You need these people.

They are not always easily replaced.

He cannot stop the ship from sinking on his own. He relies on many others.

His job is to make the right decisions and that may well be changing only a few things. It depends what he uncovers and also, what the alternatives are.

But knowledge is critical.

If there are staff issues, sure he may have to make some brutal and tough decisions. That’s what he’s there for.

Everything above is exactly why Justin failed.

A CEO leads, they establish controls/structure/governance and early on simplify the decision makers to then gradually grow the scope towards the plan. They then focus on the team around them often 3-6mths from appointment to build an executive/team that can execute to the required plan.

The board embraces the change and dynamics that flow as part of their decision process. They want a change not same old.

Knowledge of the inner workings isn’t critical day 1 especially when an organization hasn’t been performing for an extended time.

Richo needs to be oblivious to it on purpose he needs to focus top down and have confidence in who he drives into leader roles and other positions they will deliver. He will head into structure mode soon enough and I expect a few more people to be moved on.

If Justin could download all those aspects then it highlights even more so how bad a CEO he was as he ignored them & couldn’t action them.

Experience however in being an executive in the field they are employed is critical which Richo has.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Back
Top