Luke Brooks #167

He should have a quality season if he DCE and turbo stay fit. Looking at the games today I can not see us beating any of the teams that played today
Would Brooks have had a quality season at WT with DCE and Turbo in the team? imho, he will get better as the season progresses regardless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BZN
Would Brooks have had a quality season at WT with DCE and Turbo in the team? imho, he will get better as the season progresses regardless.
Far too early, but if he has a strong year taking a back seat, you watch how fast people lament him not playing second fiddle to Luai next year.
 
Who was the club without a brain for a decade that didn’t realise this? How did they not figure that out?

Which commentators?

You’ve already said Brooks has no brain. If so, the club can’t be blameless for not utilising him the right way.
Glad to see your heavily invested.
Answer1. Potter, Cleary, and Madge all said it’s brooks team now. Which indicates that they believe brooks has the intelligence to control a team!
Answer 2. Matty John’s, Tallis, Vossy, etc. more will come out of the woodwork!
Answer 3. I have nothing against brooks more so the incompetent coaches we have employed over the last decade. That could not see that brooks is clueless and can really only play eyes up footy.
 
Surely there's a fairly long list on NRL players in the game for 11 years that own their own home?
I'm pretty sure there's 15 other clubs where his time would have been much more productive...

History will never know.
Brooks wasn't alone suffering from the clubs inability to achieve success on the field but he was remunerated better than most (and a lot more than many others at more successful clubs) for the same poor results. WTs set him up for life so now he can just enjoy his footy in what is clearly a much better outfit.
 
Glad to see your heavily invested.
Answer1. Potter, Cleary, and Madge all said it’s brooks team now. Which indicates that they believe brooks has the intelligence to control a team!
Answer 2. Matty John’s, Tallis, Vossy, etc. more will come out of the woodwork!
Answer 3. I have nothing against brooks more so the incompetent coaches we have employed over the last decade. That could not see that brooks is clueless and can really only play eyes up footy.
Agree, Brooks has NEVER had the IQ or the voice to be a controlling half....why WT persisted with him at 7 god only knows.
 
Remember all those years the narrative was "it wasn't Lukes team as Robbie was there", "It wasn't Lukes team because Benji was there" and then when he was on his own it was "finally his time", "his time to step up", it was "his time to take control and play his game". pfffff

13 years of pure shit for the Tiges no matter what role he was handed on a silver platter and protected for over a decade. He was complete shit when he wasn't in the limelight and it wasn't his team, and played equally as shit for a couple of years when it was "his team".

Glad he has moved on, zero loss to the Tigers as he did nothing and would have continued to do nothing this season if he was here.

Even a turd can be polished at surface level. One swallow doesn't make a summer. Lets see how well he plays for the entire season, or god forbid he is put in a position where he has to be the main playmaker for Manly. The hilarity and finger pointing at Manly fans will ensue.
13 years.
Nothing like an exaggeration to enhance a point.
It was 11 and even then that 1st year was one solitary game.
Rob Lui was the half 13 years ago.
 
He did.
We needed overs to keep him.
Sure, he wanted out the last 2 seasons, but then a wind of change may have had him reconsidering? Something Sheens said ‘you would think the coach should be able to get the halfback he wants,’ indicates some resistance from within the list committee, with board not willing to give ground in light of the Manly offer?
Water under the bridge now, but the talk about the Brooks move is that everyone wins Seibold, Manly, Tigers, crazy Tigers fans looking to lay blame for our 2 spoons as well as Brooks himself.
Do Tigers really have a win though?
Maybe Richo wanted the club to cut Brooks’ umbilical chord?
All I know is that for every player we lose who then improves at another club isn’t doing anything to improve our reputation as a destination for rising talent.
 
As awfully written as this is, it still deserves comment
There is no longer a competition between the WTF and Brooks. He lost as did we all.
Today marks a new era for him and in 2 weeks it’ll be a new era for us. He played pretty well today and looks to be settling in nicely with the Manly backline that has lots of points in them.
It remains to be seen whether we’ll be better off without him. I’d suggest we will be.
I've said all along that Brooksy would go pretty well over at Manly with some good players around him and the pressure of all the expectations lifted from his shoulders.

I thought he played well yesterday and the biggest mistake I saw him make was throwing a Benji like pass over the sideline which I thought at a pinch could have been on for Jaxson Paulo.

On a 3,2,1 basis I would have given Brooks at least 1 point while poor old Latrine for all his huffing and puffing and the sickening promotion he got in the media only got a LOL from me.

Edit:
Before yesterday I had no idea that Paulo was at Manly, pretty sure it was Paulo that the pass was intended for.
 
He just needs other guys who can break the line so he’s not the only person you need to game plan against. Simple.
That is exactly it.
Look across the Tigers over the past 5 years and everyone has a hyper focus on Luke Brooks.
Why? Because he is the only player with half an ability to do anything.
Notice how he was the 3rd ranked profile in the spine. That’s not even including the impact of Koula outside him or Olakawatu on the adjacent side.
Manly have assembled the team we could only have dreamed about Luke being part of over the past 5 years..
 
Glad to see your heavily invested.
How am I invested any more than you or anyone else?
Answer1. Potter, Cleary, and Madge all said it’s brooks team now. Which indicates that they believe brooks has the intelligence to control a team!
Clearly they were idiots. No blame though?
Answer 2. Matty John’s, Tallis, Vossy, etc. more will come out of the woodwork!
They said he was useless? I find that neatly impossible to believe
Answer 3. I have nothing against brooks more so the incompetent coaches we have employed over the last decade. That could not see that brooks is clueless and can really only play eyes up footy.
So it is the clubs fault. Why are you so adamant that the club doesn’t deserve to be called out then?
 
How am I invested any more than you or anyone else?

Clearly they were idiots. No blame though?

They said he was useless? I find that neatly impossible to believe

So it is the clubs fault. Why are you so adamant that the club doesn’t deserve to be called out then?
Even sheens saw it when he came back was trying hard to get a controlling half, Pearce, etc. says more about the douche bag coaches we employed. Mind u Cleary got the best out of brooks. It’s obviously hard to get a controlling half in the market. But we would of been better to get an old hat like sezer ti partner brooks years ago. Dumb coaches with no idea trying to reinvent brooks as a controlling half.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BZN
He did.
We needed overs to keep him.

By reports, He took 700 at Manly.
Anyone considering that overs for an NRL half at his age with his experience
hasn't really had a look at the Market, Or the void coming inside the next 3 years,
And the lack of kids coming through to replace it...
 
Who was the club without a brain for a decade that didn’t realise this? How did they not figure that out?

Which commentators?

You’ve already said Brooks has no brain. If so, the club can’t be blameless for not utilising him the right way.
Thought all this talk of LB was "over the top" yesterday... Now you're chopping peoples posts on the topic

If you can't beat em.....?
 
Back
Top