Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

Buttface said:
I see what you did there. 👍🏻
Yeah they cuzzez, Will is 31, this bloke is 25 and played plenty of rugby already and his stats weren’t worth writing home about, feels a bit like you’ve just pick up a new girl, taken her out, and two of ya mates go “I’ve been there already”. Ya still keen bcoz she’s still new to you, but ya now asking what’s wrong with her
Click to expand...

Tito Santana said:
Agreed.

I’d take Nathan Brown off Manly for 2 years and swap to Bateman.
Click to expand...
It's not going to happen either.
 
Schuster now officially released by Manly.
He would now only command about 250-300k maximum and I know it’s far from ideal recruiting known lazy trainers who carry that same laziness into game days, however not many players possess the size and talent of Schuster.
In NRL terms 250-300k is a low risk, if the player gets his act together, trains hard and produces his best we have a bargain, if he continues to be lazy we simply don’t re-son him past this season.
 
Vicious said:
Schuster now officially released by Manly.
He would now only command about 250-300k maximum and I know it’s far from ideal recruiting known lazy trainers who carry that same laziness into game days, however not many players possess the size and talent of Schuster.
In NRL terms 250-300k is a low risk, if the player gets his act together, trains hard and produces his best we have a bargain, if he continues to be lazy we simply don’t re-son him past this season.
Click to expand...

sorry … not committing the one Top 30 space left to another project
 
Vicious said:
Schuster now officially released by Manly.
He would now only command about 250-300k maximum and I know it’s far from ideal recruiting known lazy trainers who carry that same laziness into game days, however not many players possess the size and talent of Schuster.
In NRL terms 250-300k is a low risk, if the player gets his act together, trains hard and produces his best we have a bargain, if he continues to be lazy we simply don’t re-son him past this season.
Click to expand...
I don't think he has been officially released yet, just free to explore his options.
If he comes here with his head screwed on I would pay 300k max.
 
Tito Santana said:
Agreed.

I’d take Nathan Brown off Manly for 2 years and swap to Bateman.
Click to expand...
Why would we swap Nathan Brown in for Bateman?

I mean we could have signed Nathan Brown when he was looking to leave Parramatta. Hey I don't mind him as a player, but he probably has only 2 years of footy left.

Also if Parra is forking out 800k for Lomax, we may be able to interest them in taking Nathan Brown off their hands. We need a Depth forward but we really need a more Dynamic second rower. Luciano Leulia would really suit our current side if he was going for 300k and not this dilusion of 900k.
 
crazycat said:
Why would we swap Nathan Brown in for Bateman?

I mean we could have signed Nathan Brown when he was looking to leave Parramatta. Hey I don't mind him as a player, but he probably has only 2 years of footy left.

Also if Parra is forking out 800k for Lomax, we may be able to interest them in taking Nathan Brown off their hands. We need a Depth forward but we really need a more Dynamic second rower. Luciano Leulia would really suit our current side if he was going for 300k and not this dilusion of 900k.
Click to expand...

Nathan Brown has not played for Pawwa since 2022 so no deals for him from them,last year he was a rorter and this year an eagle
 
Camel2281 said:
Mate, do you watch footy? He's been the Roosters best forward this year. He's getting back to his representative form
Click to expand...
Hahaha nar not the roosters game and
Mate if he's not heading overseas he will be in a rooster's jersey wake up to your self , your just throwing out names as if it's a possibility..if he's going that good the roosters will do everything to keep him. you Muppet
 
HUNT 101 said:
Hahaha nar not the roosters game and
Mate if he's not heading overseas he will be in a rooster's jersey wake up to your self , your just throwing out names as if it's a possibility..if he's going that good the roosters will do everything to keep him. you Muppet
Click to expand...
The Roosters didn’t want him a few weeks back and it was only poor form from the back rowers that were being selected in front of him that allowed him to get his NRL starting spot back.
It’s highly likely the Roosters will now realise he’s their best edge forward Andrew-sign him with a few brown paper bags to help clinch the deal, BUT sometimes knowing the club you spilled blood for didn’t want you burns deep and he may want look for a new challenge because of it.
In either case we could t afford him unless we offload one of our incumbents.
 
FrodoTBaggin said:
I don't think he has been officially released yet, just free to explore his options.
If he comes here with his head screwed on I would pay 300k max.
Click to expand...
Officially released straight away, Manly claiming his contract has been terminated based on him not meeting performance based requirements.
I just think it may be the kick up the backside he needs and I think it would be worth taking a risk on him at 250-300k for the remainder of this season.
 
Vicious said:
Officially released straight away, Manly claiming his contract has been terminated based on him not meeting performance based requirements.
I just think it may be the kick up the backside he needs and I think it would be worth taking a risk on him at 250-300k for the remainder of this season.
Click to expand...

thankfully Benji thinks differently… he is no where ready mentally or physically for NRL in the short term
 
Vicious said:
Officially released straight away, Manly claiming his contract has been terminated based on him not meeting performance based requirements.
I just think it may be the kick up the backside he needs and I think it would be worth taking a risk on him at 250-300k for the remainder of this season.
Click to expand...
You keep saying officially, can you link me one source that shows it is official? All I have seen is speculation Manly has a weight clause, and Seibold come out an hour ago and say he is taking a 2 week leave.
 
Vicious said:
Schuster now officially released by Manly.
He would now only command about 250-300k maximum and I know it’s far from ideal recruiting known lazy trainers who carry that same laziness into game days, however not many players possess the size and talent of Schuster.
In NRL terms 250-300k is a low risk, if the player gets his act together, trains hard and produces his best we have a bargain, if he continues to be lazy we simply don’t re-son him past this season.
Click to expand...

Offer him a 1yr with 2yr MO deal min contract year 1 and incentives year 2/3 if it works out.
Be very low risk.
 
Wearyfan22 said:
Appreciate the well thought out response.
Click to expand...
I said it before he is way to small for our side, Olam is short fauutape is short, Staines is not that tall and a dweeb. We need height and size for our wingers. He looks good in a great side, news flash we are not a great side! We have Willet, large and Maskaski coming through. I’d save my cash for a shiller type with speed and more size and a hell of a lot cheaper.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 803 (members: 50, guests: 753)
Back
Top