hank37w
Well-known member
Can he fall on a loose ball when the need arises?His a whole hearted player with good effort off the ball but that about it from what I have see. Think Chris heinington ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can he fall on a loose ball when the need arises?His a whole hearted player with good effort off the ball but that about it from what I have see. Think Chris heinington ?
No thanks to the laughing JAC ass.No way , the bloke is a game player , laughed us off in the past , we need 2 quality forwards
Wouldn’t this season now be over as we have ticked into November? Would imagine the financials can’t be back-tracked.If the club can move Sullivan & Bateman on, with the cap space available, I'd be trying to pay out as much this season as they can.
For example- we are under the cap now by (let's just say) $800k
Sullivan is on $500k per year
Bateman on $650k per year.
Club A takes Sullivan and we chip in $300k, they pay $200k
Club B takes Bateman & we chip in $350k, they pay $300k
Tigers 'save' $500k to add to the $800k, giving $1.3m to spend for next season.
OR...
Despite moving them on, Tigers pay Bateman $650k as promised in 2025 & Sullivan $500k as promised- so that in 2026 we owe both players $200k less & $300k less while not changing our cap for 2025 at all- either up or down. But 2026/2027 cap hits are reduced by the price of a pretty decent 1st grade player on $500k.
Short term pain for longer term gain. That extra $500k could fall quite nicely into Galvin's pocket next year to then keep him.
If the club can move Sullivan & Bateman on, with the cap space available, I'd be trying to pay out as much this season as they can.
For example- we are under the cap now by (let's just say) $800k
Sullivan is on $500k per year
Bateman on $650k per year.
Club A takes Sullivan and we chip in $300k, they pay $200k
Club B takes Bateman & we chip in $350k, they pay $300k
Tigers 'save' $500k to add to the $800k, giving $1.3m to spend for next season.
OR...
Despite moving them on, Tigers pay Bateman $650k as promised in 2025 & Sullivan $500k as promised- so that in 2026 we owe both players $200k less & $300k less while not changing our cap for 2025 at all- either up or down. But 2026/2027 cap hits are reduced by the price of a pretty decent 1st grade player on $500k.
Short term pain for longer term gain. That extra $500k could fall quite nicely into Galvin's pocket next year to then keep him.
It’s a good point. If we have them on the books anyway and the only sticking point is the roster spots can we afford to pay them in full this year and sign 3 forwards in Fainu, Hetherington and May?If the club can move Sullivan & Bateman on, with the cap space available, I'd be trying to pay out as much this season as they can.
For example- we are under the cap now by (let's just say) $800k
Sullivan is on $500k per year
Bateman on $650k per year.
Club A takes Sullivan and we chip in $300k, they pay $200k
Club B takes Bateman & we chip in $350k, they pay $300k
Tigers 'save' $500k to add to the $800k, giving $1.3m to spend for next season.
OR...
Despite moving them on, Tigers pay Bateman $650k as promised in 2025 & Sullivan $500k as promised- so that in 2026 we owe both players $200k less & $300k less while not changing our cap for 2025 at all- either up or down. But 2026/2027 cap hits are reduced by the price of a pretty decent 1st grade player on $500k.
Short term pain for longer term gain. That extra $500k could fall quite nicely into Galvin's pocket next year to then keep him.
(unless the rules have changed) Any payment to terminate his contract would go against the cap. The club and player can agree on the payment amount and duration. If the agreed amount was 1mil for example then that 1m could be paid in one sum (again must be agreed upon) and be counted on the cap of the year the payment occurred. If it was agreed at 1mil paid over 3 years then it would be 333K against the cap each year.does anyone know if a one time lump sum to Bud to terminate contract goes against our cap? and if it does is it spread over 3 yrs, or 1 yr if we choose?
No- I'm talking about next season. Still on the hook for both for 3 years I believe. So I'm suggesting paying full freight in 2025 to lower 2026 onwards..Wouldn’t this season now be over as we have ticked into November? Would imagine the financials can’t be back-tracked.
Tigers are on the hook for them for the next 3 seasons. So either we pay the reported $300k or so for each to play elsewhere for the entire length of the contract or we pay forward while the club HAS the cap space to lower the freight in 2026 onwards.Shithouse Idea....
Unless we have 3 mill left from this years cap, (That expired on Nov 1 by the way) and they've already been paid?
As of yesterday, We're paying them for 2025.
- 300k to get them to leave, Minimum 200k to replace them with a player of lesser value...
Where is the sense?
The next 2-3 years isn't 'Short Term' It's longer than most of our squad is contracted for....
Yes great ideaI love ur accounting , but ur looking 2 years ahead of ur self , if we don’t go close to making the 8 , u can say goodbye to Galvin and maybe some others , 2025 us our Waterloo , trust me next year will be the making of this club or the dead off itIf the club can move Sullivan & Bateman on, with the cap space available, I'd be trying to pay out as much this season as they can.
For example- we are under the cap now by (let's just say) $800k
Sullivan is on $500k per year
Bateman on $650k per year.
Club A takes Sullivan and we chip in $300k, they pay $200k
Club B takes Bateman & we chip in $350k, they pay $300k
Tigers 'save' $500k to add to the $800k, giving $1.3m to spend for next season.
OR...
Despite moving them on, Tigers pay Bateman $650k as promised in 2025 & Sullivan $500k as promised- so that in 2026 we owe both players $200k less & $300k less while not changing our cap for 2025 at all- either up or down. But 2026/2027 cap hits are reduced by the price of a pretty decent 1st grade player on $500k.
Short term pain for longer term gain. That extra $500k could fall quite nicely into Galvin's pocket next year to then keep him.
Would anyone like to rethink the Laulilli brothers early elevation to the top 30 to make way for the May and Hetherington etc signings. The boys could go on development deals which is probably their level tbh
I don't need to.Go back & look at that Harold Matts winning side.
Mason was 5/8.
Galvin was outstanding on the left edge in the second row. Perfect ball player to set up players inside & out.
Tigers HAVE to get their best players on the field, and Latu Fainu is one of their best.
I think we also need to put some pressure on them and there manager as well by saying you can stay but it will be reserve grade.Tigers are on the hook for them for the next 3 seasons. So either we pay the reported $300k or so for each to play elsewhere for the entire length of the contract or we pay forward while the club HAS the cap space to lower the freight in 2026 onwards.
I've not heard the club having trouble affording buying players for next season. It's roster spots. So I'm assuming there are probably the dollars invested in Papali'i, Utoikamanu etc mostly available- somewhere between $800-$1.2m I would assume.
Roosters? Lol
Roosters? Lol
2026?How?
They have Dom Young and Tupou - Both top tier Wingers on Good Money....
unless they're shipping off Tups, But he just re-signed also...
Then there's the high profile Rugby guy - He's got a bot of something also....
He's not playing for crackers I'm sure of it.
Where does he fit?
I reckon they're playing for a big name half and middles in the next year or so...
Sione Mata'utia is a good player but from recollection suffered from injury. The SMH article provides background.
![]()
Another concussion for Sione Mata'utia puts spotlight on Newcastle Knights' treatment of head knocks
The Knights are facing another concussion-related dilemma after back-rower Sione Mata'utia suffered two head knocks in Saturday's 19-18 loss to Cronulla before he was withdrawn from the game.www.smh.com.au