Tucker
Well-known member
They make you earn itPapalii not starting at Penrith .....slightly surprised
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They make you earn itPapalii not starting at Penrith .....slightly surprised
Reporter must be trolling Brooks. Can't even let him stop fielding questions about his time here 12 months after he's gone.![]()
Luke Brooks' sad admission as Jarome Luai tipped for 14-year first at Wests Tigers
Huge improvement is expected at the Tigers off the back of Luai's signing. More here.au.news.yahoo.com
Hot for Tommy T?I’m hoping that they pick Tommy T
that would make it even sweater 👍
What do you mean ? Benji is gen y / millennial . Bateman would be the next one after Gen Z .sounds like a gen Y issue
Yea but only one in the 17Fitness and defence are keybro improvement ans success.
We need Twal and Seyfarth in our squad.
Both of them are Gen Y.What do you mean ? Benji is gen y / millennial . Bateman would be the next one after Gen Z .
Agreed.Any word on David Klemmer anywhere , was all over the sport news last week but since Friday nothing , if he is still with us would he be in your 17 this week , I would have him in and starting with May , you can’t have a player like him sitting in the crowd waiting for a new club , he is better than both Kitt and Sione and if I had to pick out of Klemmer and Twally I would take Klemmer he is great in defence and just keeps going .
Hunt , Pole , Twall on bench
Sam F , Bird , Seyfarth Backrow
Nope they are from the same generation.What do you mean ? Benji is gen y / millennial . Bateman would be the next one after Gen Z .
That’s nothing but a nasty little rumour. Who are the two? Ice? He was told he wasn’t in future plans, found himself a new club and asked for an early release which the club granted. Steph? There’s no bad blood there between he and the club. You laying groundwork for something?Particularly when we also had two other players, nearly 3 walk out as well. It’s always the players fault to some. If one of these new signings doesn’t work out and God forbid has a falling out with the club, it will be his fault too.
No.FFS let’s do what both club and player have done on move on from the Bateman discussion. It’s all been repeated 100 times.
We need them both as we're not the best at defence.Yea but only one in the 17
JOffa was the first to leave after a conflict with Marshall.That’s nothing but a nasty little rumour. Who are the two? Ice? He was told he wasn’t in future plans, found himself a new club and asked for an early release which the club granted. Steph? There’s no bad blood there between he and the club. You laying groundwork for something?
You nailed it with this bit:JOffa was the first to leave after a conflict with Marshall.
Klemmer was rumoured to have had issues with Marshall before his form dropped mid last year and now leaving/being pushed out.
I agree there is no bad blood between Steph and the club, but it was clear that Steph wasn't buying into what the club were selling him. Not just because he decided to leave but he also obviously mentally checked out early.
Similarly, yes your version of events for Papallii is accurate but the real question is why wasn't he in the plans?
Anyhow, bad blood or not, they both walked out. It may be for the better, we don't yet know.
It is fair to say that all 4 above plus Bateman weren't performing to their price tag and that is why Marshall took issue with them.
It is equally fair to say that all 4 players had previously played to a level that earnt them that contract value and question why Marshall couldn't have them perform at that level.
Unless/until Marshall gets results with 'his team' he will be questioned.
Why weren’t they performing?You nailed it with this bit:
“It is fair to say that all 4 above plus Bateman weren't performing to their price tag and that is why Marshall took issue with them.”
The rest is a nasty little rumour. Plenty of journos about to do that sort of dirty work.
Who's chicken are you trying to choke, ? ya yanker .lolI'm sorry to raise the Roosters...rumour doing the rounds that they have been sprung on the cap cheating. They have agreed to stay under the cap as punishment in what is essentially a plea deal to keep their breach hush hush.
I laughed when I heard this. However, look at their ins and outs....anything is possible. I had it on much better authority that they were paying out club owners to lose any cc footage of their stars on the gear ages ago.
Anything bad for them, its my duty to spread. Truth comes second.
So I mean tbh I think we panicked and over paid them to secure their signatures. Don’t disagree with your wider point though.Why weren’t they performing?