Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

[tigermate]

Not any time soon he won't.

November 1 isnt that far away.

 

[Tucker]

I'm not hyping him

Gould is.

The league world is - Andrew Johns, Cam Smith, Billy slater.

If Dylan Brown can get a ten year $12M offer -- Galvin will get way more.

In the trial last week Galvin was a constant threat. And he's only 19.

Someone will bank on him to be a franchise player - and they'll pay stupid money to grab him.

If they pay that much money, they’ll lose their job.
I don’t know why people compare Galvin to Brown…even suggesting Lachy will command more.
We went over this a few weeks ago. Brown has largely earnt his payday. Galvin has not in any way shape or form done so yet.

 

[Rock Hopper Steve]

And now he's captain of the club and will have basically played his whole career (From a kid) with them
- Bar his 4-5 Years at the Tigers.

I'm not saying he'll jump because his family is a fan
- But there is 1 Billion percent more chance of that happening,
Than him not going back because they cut him at 15 - As was suggested.

If they have a spot, and they have money and the interest, Only an idiot would think that Galvin won't heavily consider it.

You would remember B when the big four were here at the season start before 3 decided to jump ship, how well they played against a madge coached souths just teared them apart, then the unrest set in and it all fell to bits, makes you wonder if we could have kept them all if our history since would have been much better.

 

[bptiger 0]

Just seen our gun forward MAY at Peppertree park watching the local football , nice bloke , asked him about his brother , said he would be joining him at the tigers if the court case goes well

 

[Buttface]

Would only be for money imo.

So if you played juniors for the Tigers and they cut you free as you’re coming through, and you’re now playing for a team that has come last, and the new CEO (Richo), comes and says sorry, but the old CEO ( Fruit Pascals) is gone and we need you back. You’re childhood club you’ve dreamed about playing for needs you and your gunna say no?
I’d do for the Tigers in a heartbeat and I grew up a magpie.
Plus a bucket of cash.

 

[TurnStyle]

So if you played juniors for the Tigers and they cut you free as you’re coming through, and you’re now playing for a team that has come last, and the new CEO (Richo), comes and says sorry, but the old CEO ( Fruit Pascals) is gone and we need you back. You’re childhood club you’ve dreamed about playing for needs you and your gunna say no?
I’d do for the Tigers in a heartbeat and I grew up a magpie.
Plus a bucket of cash.

That's right: a bucket of cash.

 

[TurnStyle]

November 1 isnt that far away.

$20M for 10 years for a second year player. This year.
Okay. Consider your words marked.

 

[TurnStyle]

I remember having a beer with Aaron Woods' mum at the Orange Grove pre-game. He was playing for the opposition that day, but his mum was still wearing all Tigers clobber.

If I had a son with hair like Dora the Explorer I'd disown him too! 😂

 

[liltiger]

If they pay that much money, they’ll lose their job.
I don’t know why people compare Galvin to Brown…even suggesting Lachy will command more.
We went over this a few weeks ago. Brown has largely earnt his payday. Galvin has not in any way shape or form done so yet.

Totally agree Tucker, only takes one desperate club willing to take a risk on potential for them to start throwing money at him. We did it for years,paying overs for potential. We were desperate for success and thought it was our way out of mediocrity at the time.

 

[TurnStyle]

All that might be true, but just as easily refuted when you look at what happened with Mitch Moses. Mitch's father was a Parra fan and Parra also cut him because he was too small.

For reference: https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/yo...-cut-by-his-beloved-eels-20201009-p563m8.html

So when Moses played for the Tigers his parents didn't support them?

And I've conceded that my situation was the reverse in that I ended up at the club I played juniors for, not the one I supported.

Difference is all the players you grew up playing reps with are mostly still at the original club.

Whatever.

 

[Tiger_Yoshi]

I remember having a beer with Aaron Woods' mum at the Orange Grove pre-game. He was playing for the opposition that day, but his mum was still wearing all Tigers clobber.

Woodsy is a flog, obviously didn’t get his smarts from his mother

 

[batboy]

So when Moses played for the Tigers his parents didn't support them?

And I've conceded that my situation was the reverse in that I ended up at the club I played juniors for, not the one I supported.

Difference is all the players you grew up playing reps with are mostly still at the original club.

Whatever.

Pretty safe to assume you weren't getting a mill a year plus
- at either club.

 

[Dennisspicer1]

This is one of the more wild takes I've read on here. I actually can't believe anyone in the top couple pay brackets of the NRL wouldn't take less to chase success.

I think you are overlooking the point that I try to make,
That point being, he went to the Rorters and got more than we offered, it just was not declared by the Roosters.

Have people not noticed how many players roosters get for less than other clubs offer, but then a few years later when East are letting them go they state Roosters are letting a player leave the club, that will free up 1ml of our cap money, but his original contract they signed him on we were told was only $600.000 a season.

 

[Hargreaves]

Dennisspicer1 has hit the nail on the head. Totally correct. When Tedesco was on the market Tigers offered him over $1.1m per season. Teddy told his teammates that the Roosters $ offer blew the Tigers out of the water. But then the Roosters put out their usual bullcrap that Teddy signed for less money to play with a better team. Then they register his contract at way under a million but Teddy gets paid his $1.2m And also as you rightly say when players leave the Rorters they suddenly claim it creates huge space in their cap - but wait uncle Nick? Didn’t you say you were paying him low $ when you signed him? Anyone who believes the tripe put out by the Rorters about what they pay players is a dope. Read Malcolm Knox’s many articles about how the Rorters cheat the salary cap - but of course the NRL never ever investigates them. NRL Integrity Unit? Ha ha ha ha ha!!!

 

[gregjm87]

I think you are overlooking the point that I try to make,
That point being, he went to the Rorters and got more than we offered, it just was not declared by the Roosters.

Have people not noticed how many players roosters get for less than other clubs offer, but then a few years later when East are letting them go they state Roosters are letting a player leave the club, that will free up 1ml of our cap money, but his original contract they signed him on we were told was only $600.000 a season.

I hear fans say this all the time but I've never really seen any actual examples of it (I'm referring to your second paragraph here).
He probably did get more than we offered when you consider the value of various intangibles such as that highlighted by Tucker. Those intangibles are legal and there is simply no evidence to suggest that he received more than what was offered in illegal payments outside of the cap. We've been mismanaged for to long to be a club that benefits from any intangible value and simply need to be better to not be out competed in such a way.

I'm not naive enough to believe all payments at all clubs are above board but there is no actual evidence of any wrong doing by the roosters and until there is I see no point complaining about it.

 

[pawsandclaws1]

I'm not hyping him

Gould is.

The league world is - Andrew Johns, Cam Smith, Billy slater.

If Dylan Brown can get a ten year $12M offer -- Galvin will get way more.

In the trial last week Galvin was a constant threat. And he's only 19.

Someone will bank on him to be a franchise player - and they'll pay stupid money to grab him.

Why compare? You compare yourself to others and you will always be dissatisfied notwithstanding that Galvin has 2 years remaining on his current contract.

 

[weststigers]

So when Moses played for the Tigers his parents didn't support them?

And I've conceded that my situation was the reverse in that I ended up at the club I played juniors for, not the one I supported.

Difference is all the players you grew up playing reps with are mostly still at the original club.

Whatever.

I don't know who his parents supported. Never met the guy or his parents.

Just saying you're making a lot of assumptions when players seem to just do things on a case by case basis. Juniors, parents, blah blah doesn't seem to make a material difference in whether they stay or go.

It seems to be results, coach and money above all else and not necessarily in that order.

But you hit the nail on the head.....whatever

 

[weststigers]

Why compare? You compare yourself to others and you will always be dissatisfied notwithstanding that Galvin has 2 years remaining on his current contract.

If I compare myself to you and I feel good afterwards, would you be ok with that?

 

[king_sirro]

I hear fans say this all the time but I've never really seen any actual examples of it (I'm referring to your second paragraph here).
He probably did get more than we offered when you consider the value of various intangibles such as that highlighted by Tucker. Those intangibles are legal and there is simply no evidence to suggest that he received more than what was offered in illegal payments outside of the cap. We've been mismanaged for to long to be a club that benefits from any intangible value and simply need to be better to not be out competed in such a way.

I'm not naive enough to believe all payments at all clubs are above board but there is no actual evidence of any wrong doing by the roosters and until there is I see no point complaining about it.

I know good mates of his and they have said Teddy told them directly he will never pay for anything ever again. Now I have no clue what that means exactly. Maybe he takes receipts in every week and gets reinbursed in cash, maybe it's more elaborate, I have no clue. But I'm confident his contract value at the NRL doesn't quite match what he is bringing in each week.

I also know an ex Roosters player dad who's son was an average first grader. Said he received 100k cash every year on top of his contract. That's for an average player, so imagine the top players.

 

[weststigers]

I think you are overlooking the point that I try to make,
That point being, he went to the Rorters and got more than we offered, it just was not declared by the Roosters.

Have people not noticed how many players roosters get for less than other clubs offer, but then a few years later when East are letting them go they state Roosters are letting a player leave the club, that will free up 1ml of our cap money, but his original contract they signed him on we were told was only $600.000 a season.

How many $$$ is 1mL of our cap? How would you convert liquids to AUD?